Tractatus de divina traditione et Scriptura

Johannes Baptist Franzelin

Tractatus de divina traditione et Scriptura

Johannes Baptist Franzelin (1816–1886)

First published 1882

Franzelin's Tractatus de divina traditione et Scriptura (Romae, Ex Typographia Polyglotta S.C. de Propaganda Fide, 1882, editio tertia): the prolegomenon, the treatise on divine tradition with the scholion, the treatise on Scripture, and the dogmatic appendix. Latin from the 1882 edition, with a new English translation.


Prolegomenon: On the Objective Principles of Christian Knowledge and of Theology in General

Treatise on Divine Tradition

§ I: Section I

Caput I: Chapter I

The manifold notion of tradition is explained

On the stricter meaning of tradition, by which it is distinguished from doctrines handed down through Sacred Scripture

On the order between tradition actively considered and objective tradition in the method of treatment

On the mode and organ of propagating doctrine according to the divinely instituted Christian economy

The living magisterium is shown to be the perpetual organ of Christian tradition from the express evangelical and apostolic words

On the intimate connection of the principle of tradition with the necessary properties of the Christian religion

On the unchangeable perdurance of the same economy after the books of the New Testament were written

Caput II: Chapter II

The formal nature of tradition is demonstrated from the constitution and principles of the Church

On the visible constitution of the organ of tradition, most suited to the office enjoined on it

On the distinction between historical and dogmatic authority in the attestation of tradition

By synthesis from what precedes, the proper concept of tradition is gathered and confirmed from the sayings of the Fathers

On how the consensus of the faithful in the doctrine of faith is a criterion of divine tradition

Scholion I: Principles on the subject and object of the infallible magisterium

Scholion II: On the meaning of the various censures by which propositions are wont to be condemned

§ II: Section II

Caput I: Chapter I

On the monuments of tradition insofar as they exhibit the consensus of the guardians of the deposit, and insofar as they are instruments of doctrine for them

On the direct or indirect demonstration of consensus from the documents of antiquity

Caput II: Chapter II

On the authority of the holy Fathers taken singly

The opinion on the millennial kingdom of Christ among the Fathers before the fourth century compared with the opposite consensus of later Fathers

On how the consensus of the schools can exhibit divine tradition

§ III: Section III

Ecclesiastical preaching is the supreme norm of the interpretation of Sacred Scripture

The sufficiency of Scripture is preached by the holy Fathers not by excluding but by presupposing tradition and the ministry for guarding the deposit

On the existence of divine traditions not contained in Scripture

In manifold ways tradition precedes Scripture

§ IV: Section IV

Catholic revelation was completed through Jesus Christ and through the Holy Spirit in the Apostles

On how the doctrine of faith could at some time be proposed more obscurely, to be later explained and declared

On the true sense of the Vincentian canon

On the conjoined office of the guardians and teachers of the faith and on the mode of explaining the deposit

On the different way of explaining the deposit of faith before and after completed revelation

Dogmatic Treatise on the Divine Scriptures

§ I: Section I

Caput I: Chapter I

From the divine tradition of the Old Testament and from the doctrine of Christ himself and the Apostles, all the books and parts of books pertaining to Sacred Scripture must be believed with equal divine authority

The books of Scripture are inspired in such a way that God is the author of the books

The notion of inspiration is more distinctly declared through analysis of the dogmatic formula: God is the author of the books of Sacred Scripture

The notion of inspiration by mere divine assistance, called subsequent inspiration, is refuted

Caput II: Chapter II

On the inefficacy of internal arguments for demonstrating the inspiration of the books

On the necessity of the testimony by which inspiration becomes known

On the twofold way the divine testimony on the inspired books has been preserved to us

The principles of Protestantism are repugnant to the proof of the canon of Scripture retained by the Reformers

§ II: Section II

Caput I: Chapter I

The apostolic tradition on all the books of Scripture was declared by the Council of Trent

The apostolic tradition on the canon of the sacred books is demonstrated from the constant and universal use of the Church

The canons and express doctrine of Christian antiquity exhibit the apostolic tradition on all the divine books of the Old Testament

On the origin of the controversy on the deuterocanonical books of the Old Testament

The Fathers of the fourth and fifth centuries exhibit deficient catalogues of the books of Scripture not as closed canons but as to be supplemented

The difficulties wont to be drawn from writers of a later age are resolved

Caput II: Chapter II

All the canonical books of the New Testament were handed down by the Apostles

The origin of doubts on the deuterocanonical books of the New Testament is explained

What Saint Jerome said on the custom of not receiving the Epistle to the Hebrews and the Apocalypse is explained

§ III: Section III

On the notion of authenticity and on the dogmatic declaration of an authentic edition of Scripture

On the extension of the authenticity of the Vulgate edition declared by the Council of Trent

Contribution I: The novel and false doctrine of the dissertation

Contribution II: The fallacy of the arguments for the new doctrine

Appendix: On the Relation of Human Reason to Divine Faith

Caput I: Chapter I

On truth

On assent, certainty, evidence

Caput II: Chapter II

On self-evident truths

On truths known through others

On the formal nature of faith considered in general

Caput III: Chapter III

On the necessity of faith asserted by some, in general and namely of faith in revelation in relation to the whole order of our knowledge

On the necessity of faith said to be included in the necessity of social institution

On the necessity of revelation and of the corresponding supernatural faith for attaining the last end in the present order of elevation

On the necessity of revelation and of natural faith on the hypothesis of pure nature, whether it follows from what has been said

Caput IV: Chapter IV

On the notion of the analysis of the act of faith

On knowing the authority of God

On knowing the existence of divine revelation

On the freedom of the formal act of faith

Caput V: Chapter V

How God speaks through the Church

  1. The locution which is now proposed as divine, and whose divinity is to be known from inward reasons in the way we have said in the whole preceding chapter IV. — this locution, I say, now proposed, did not now first proceed from God, but, having set forth from God many centuries ago, has been preserved even to us. Whence to know this word (e. g. «God is one and triune») as divine is the same as to know that this word which is now proposed, long ago revealed by God, has been preserved even to us. But now the organ instituted by God for the promulgation, propagation and preservation of the whole revelation is the teaching Church, i. e. the Apostles constituted by Christ and their perennial successors. Hence God by things and facts rendered the Apostles first knowable as His legates in promulgating the revelation. «Going into the whole world preach the Gospel to every creature... But they going forth preached everywhere, the Lord working with them and confirming the word with signs that followed» Mark XVI. 20.; Heb. II. 4. etc. The successors are joined in unbroken series immediately with the Apostles themselves, and, united among themselves in communion and doctrine throughout the whole world, reach even to us as one body. From the connection with the Apostles and with Christ Himself, those things and facts of Christ and the Apostles pertain to the whole subsequent Church, which itself moreover is distinguished in every age by new things and facts as seals demonstrating its divine institution and connection with Christ and the Apostles. For the things and facts indicated above (p. 671. sq.) all pertain to the Church, and cohere with the Church, whether as its efficient and constituting principles or as effects and, if it is lawful so to speak, as its vital acts, by which the Church herself is manifested as a divinely instituted and supernatural society. Read the admirable letter 137 of St. Augustine, n. 15. sqq. to Volusian, and the booklet on the profit of believing n. 32. 35.

Thus therefore the Church, the body with Christ as head, from the origin of the human race even to us is exhibited as morally one great divine fact, in which Christ, historically knowable in His life, His miracles, the fulfilled prophecies, the sanctity and sublimity of His doctrine, His manner of teaching, His death and resurrection and glorification, is the principle and the end, the Alpha and the Omega; while the manifold series of antecedent and consequent facts, which are the manifestations of the Church herself, proceed from Christ and converge to Christ as rays to a centre, whether as preparations or as effects, and partly demonstrate Christ Himself as their supernatural cause, partly are more perfectly understood from Christ known in Himself, just as generally a cause is known from its effects and in turn effects from their cause. As therefore Christ the Lord Himself, and then the Apostles, exhibited themselves by things and facts as knowable divine legates, so the Church, both through her very connection with Christ as head and founder and with the Apostles as her first planters, waterers and members, and through new and perpetual series of things and facts, exhibits herself as the continuation of the legation of Christ and the Apostles. Cf. Tract. de Traditione th. IV. sqq.

  1. Hence it already appears how the Church, viewed according to the things and facts by which her divine institution and mission is rendered knowable, is as it were an element composing the divine locution perpetually enduring and perpetually knowable. The preaching and first promulgation of the revelation — speaking now of the New Testament — accomplished by Christ and the Apostles was composed of words and things, and through the things the locution was knowable as divine, «the Lord giving testimony to the word of His grace, granting signs» Acts XIV. 3.; that is, the revelation composed of words and things was from its ingrained reason knowable as divine, demanding assent to this truth: that such a locution (which is the subject) is a divine locution (which is the predicate). See above p. 672. in the note. In the same way therefore the revelation which is now proposed by the Church as revelation derived from Christ and the Apostles consists not only of words but also of the whole series of things and facts by which the Church is exhibited as divinely instituted and as discharging a legation for Christ for the preservation and preaching of doctrine. Therefore not only in the personal preaching of Christ and the Apostles, but also perpetually in the Church, those things and facts — namely the connection of the Church with Christ and the Apostles, the wondrous propagation and preservation, the agreement, the supernatural charisms manifesting themselves, the constancy in the faith received, the martyrdoms, the whole manifested spiritual life of the Church, all those things namely which we have called the Church viewed according to things and facts — compose the divine locution itself, insofar as it stands composed of the twofold element of words and things.

  2. But here sedulous attention must be paid to the threefold diverse consideration of things and facts which we declared above at p. 680., lest anyone be deceived in so grave a matter, or give occasion of erring by his manner of speaking. As we have often said, the formal motive of faith is solely the authority of God speaking. Whence if things and facts be viewed in themselves and apart, they are in relation to the divine locution signs manifesting its divinity to the intellect, in relation to the thing to be believed signs manifesting its credibility, and thus in each way they are motives of credibility. Only when considered in the third way — that God composes His locution and His divine eloquence, according to the saying of Augustine, of words and facts — do the facts enter into the divine locution itself to be known from its inward reasons, and in this way enter into the formal motive itself. Thus when a king speaks through his legate, the formal motive of believing the royal word with due faith is the authority of the king speaking, not the royal diploma and seal or the retinue with which the legate appears. But if those things be considered as an element composing with the words one royal locution, which thus viewed in the complex is knowable from itself, in this way those things enter into the formal motive itself.

On the knowability of divine revelation through the Church

On the necessity of the testimony of the Church for divine and catholic faith

Caput VI: Chapter VI

On how faith and the authority infallibly proposing the doctrine of faith is, and is not, a norm for the sciences

On the use and subordination of the sciences in expounding the doctrine of the faith

↑ Top of work