Apologeticae sive Theologiae Fundamentalis, Tomus II (Pars Altera): Demonstratio Catholica

Hilarin Felder

Apologeticae sive Theologiae Fundamentalis, Tomus II (Pars Altera): Demonstratio Catholica

Hilarin Felder (1867–1951)

Apologeticae sive Theologiae Fundamentalis

First published 1920

Tomus II—Demonstratio Catholica—completes Hilarin Felder's Apologeticae sive Theologiae Fundamentalis by treating the Catholic Church as the historical bearer and interpreter of revelation. Published at Paderborn in 1920 (with the second-edition setting issued in 1923), it develops the marks, continuity, authority, and universality of the Church through biblical, historical, patristic, and scholastic argument. Read with Tomus I, it documents the structure of early twentieth-century Catholic fundamental theology and the apologetic priorities of the period. Schola presents the 1920 Latin edition with an English translation.


Prooemium

§ I: De ecclesia ut societate christifidelium

Dissertatio I: De institutione ecclesiae

Caput I: De facto ecclesiae a Christo institutae

Articulus I: Realitas ecclesiae a Christo institutae

Subarticulus I: Testimonium Christi ipsius

Subarticulus II: Testimonium apostolorum Christi

Subarticulus III: Testimonium antiquitatis christianae

Articulus II: Unicitas ecclesiae a Christo institutae

Subarticulus I: Testimonium Christi ipsius

Subarticulus II: Testimonium apostolorum Christi

Subarticulus III: Testimonium antiquitatis christianae

Caput II: De fine ecclesiae a Christo institutae

Articulus I: Finis proximus ecclesiae

Subarticulus I: Testimonium Christi

Subarticulus II: Testimonium apostolorum

Subarticulus III: Testimonium antiquitatis christianae

Articulus II: Finis remotus ecclesiae

Subarticulus I: Sententia explicatur

Subarticulus II: Sententia probatur

Caput III: De indole ecclesiae a Christo institutae

Articulus I: De indole indefectibili ecclesiae

Subarticulus I: De exsistentia indefectibili ecclesiae

Subarticulus II: De essentia indefectibili ecclesiae

Articulus II: De indole visibili ecclesiae

Subarticulus I: Argumentatio directa

Subarticulus II: Argumentatio indirecta

Articulus III: De indole supernaturali ecclesiae

Subarticulus I: Thesis principalis

Subarticulus II: Consectaria specialia

Corollaria apologetico-dogmatica

Subarticulus I: De corpore et anima ecclesiae

Subarticulus II: De membris ecclesiae

Dissertatio II: De constitutione ecclesiae

Caput I: De constitutione ecclesiae hierarchica

Articulus I: De hierarchia ecclesiae generatim

Subarticulus I: Testimonia evangelica

Subarticulus II: Testimonia apostolica

Subarticulus III: Testimonia patristica

Articulus II: De episcopatu singillatim

Subarticulus I: Documenta saeculi primi

Subarticulus II: Documenta saeculi secundi

Caput II: De constitutione ecclesiae monarchica

Articulus I: De primatu Petri apostoli

Subarticulus I: Primatus petrinus in s. Scriptura praeclare promittitur

Subarticulus II: Primatus petrinus in s. Scriptura sollemniter confertur

Subarticulus III: Primatus petrinus in s. Scriptura luculenter illustratur

Subarticulus IV: Primatus petrinus in s. Scriptura perenniter stabilitur

Articulus II: De primatu romani pontificis

Subarticulus I: Petrus romano pontifici primatum reliquit

Subarticulus II: Romani pontifices primatum sibi semper attribuerunt

Subarticulus III: Patres primatum romani pontificis semper docuerunt

Subarticulus IV: Ecclesia tota primatum romani pontificis semper agnovit

Subarticulus V: Scholia de vi et ortu primatus romani

Dissertatio III: De inventione ecclesiae

Caput I: De explicatione notarum

Articulus I: Unitas ecclesiae

Subarticulus I: Unitas confessionis symbolicae

Subarticulus II: Unitas communionis socialis

Articulus II: Sanctitas ecclesiae

Subarticulus I: Sanctitas simpliciter accepta

Subarticulus II: Sanctitas emphatice accepta

Articulus III: Catholicitas ecclesiae

Subarticulus I: Catholicitas ecclesiae determinatur

Subarticulus II: Catholicitas ecclesiae demonstratur

Articulus IV: Apostolicitas ecclesiae

Subarticulus I: Apostolicitas originis

Subarticulus II: Apostolicitas successionis

Caput II: De applicatione notarum

Articulus I: Ecclesia una

Subarticulus I: Ecclesia romana una est

Subarticulus II: Coetus antiromani non sunt uni

Articulus II: Ecclesia sancta

Subarticulus I: Ecclesia romana sancta est

Subarticulus II: Coetus antiromani non sunt sancti

Articulus III: Ecclesia catholica

Subarticulus I: Ecclesia romana catholica est

Subarticulus II: Coetus antiromani non sunt catholici

Articulus IV: Ecclesia apostolica

Subarticulus I: Ecclesia romana apostolica est

Subarticulus II: Coetus antiromani non sunt apostolici

§ II: De ecclesia ut magistra christifidelium

Dissertatio I: De propositione revelationis sive de regula fidei proxima

Caput I: De exsistentia magisterii ecclesiastici

Articulus I: De magisterio authentico

Subarticulus I: Falsitas principii protestantici

Subarticulus I: Inspiratio privata

The Reformers, in order to vindicate for individuals the faculty of judging concerning faith, taught that a private inspiration, or subjective illumination, is granted by the Holy Spirit to each one who reads Scripture. For they said that the word of God, objectively inspired, by its inherent power, which is the power of the Holy Spirit, so illuminates each reader subjectively that they necessarily understand the genuine sense.

And so individual faithful are constituted judges of all dogmas and of all teachers, since they themselves immediately have God as interpreter and teacher, according to that saying of Luther: "Let everyone be the freest judge of all who teach him, taught within by God alone."

Nevertheless, this private inspiration is refuted both by Sacred Scripture and by Protestant history.

  1. Sacred Scripture. Nothing do the Protestants hold more solemnly than the assertion: that nothing is to be believed unless it is proved from Scripture. And necessarily indeed, since Scripture is for them the unique source of revealed faith, as they commonly affirm, e. g. in the „Formula concordiae" (1577): „We believe that the sacred letters alone are that unique and most certain rule, to which all dogmas must be referred, and according to which judgment must be passed on all doctrines and all teachers." But private inspiration cannot be proved valid by any testimony of Scripture, although the Protestants scrape together many texts of the Old and New Testament to support it.

From the Old Testament they adduce the prophecies of Isaiah: „All your children shall be taught of the Lord"; of Jeremiah: „And they shall teach no more every man his neighbor ... saying: Know the Lord: for they shall all know me from the least of them unto the greatest, saith the Lord"; of Joel: „And it shall come to pass after this, that I will pour out my spirit upon all flesh: and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy." But by these prophecies it is only promised that in messianic times men will be given the perfect revelation of God — nay, that by the outpouring of the Holy Spirit even charisms will be conferred. But of private inspiration, insofar as it would explain Scripture to individual faithful to the exclusion of the authority of the Church, no mention is made.

From the New Testament they object the words of Paul: „But the sensual man perceiveth not these things that are of the Spirit of God ... but the spiritual man judgeth all things; and he himself is judged of no man", and also those of John: „You have the unction from the Holy One, and know all things ... you have no need that any man teach you". By these and similar words the apostles — without speaking of a subjective inspiration granted to readers of the Scriptures — warn the faithful not to lend their ear to private teachers, but to preserve intact the faith received through the help of the apostolic magisterium. Hence, having rejected the private norm, whether written or oral, they establish as the proximate rule of faith the one magisterium of the Church.

  1. Protestant history demonstrates to the eyes that that private inspiration of the Holy Spirit is defended in vain, since Protestantism abounds in dissensions and contradictions. The „inspired" men had scarcely abjured the Catholic Church when they quarreled among themselves and at different times taught different and opposed things about one and the same matter. V. g. Luther was consistent neither with Zwingli, nor with Calvin, nor with himself. In the most serious heads of doctrine a truly Babylonian confusion soon prevailed; e. g. concerning original sin sixteen, concerning justification twenty, concerning the eucharistic words „Hoc est corpus meum" two hundred opinions were put forward. There is no absurdity so impious and so monstrous that it has not been evolved out of Scripture by force of that feigned private inspiration. Scripture left to the arbitrary judgment of individuals is rightly described by the Protestant theologian Samuel Werenfels († 1740) in verses:

„This book it is, in which each one seeks his own dogmas, And likewise each one finds his own dogmas."

And thus gradually there arose almost innumerable sects, which, while they continually changed their own doctrines, most bitterly attacked the opinions of others, devastating England, Belgium, Germany, and Scotland with fire and sword.

Unless, therefore, you wish to call the Holy Spirit the author of these absurdities, it must be conceded that the Protestants, in explaining the Scriptures, were led not by private inspiration but by private caprice.

Subarticulus II: Inquisitio privata

Subarticulus II: Veritas principii catholici

Subarticulus I: Testimonia Scripturae sacrae

Subarticulus II: Testimonia antiquitatis christianae

Articulus II: De magisterio infallibili

Subarticulus I: Infallibilitas episcopatus universi

Subarticulus I: Argumentum biblicum

Subarticulus II: Argumentum historicum

Subarticulus II: Infallibilitas romani pontificis

Subarticulus I: Argumentum biblicum

Subarticulus II: Argumentum historicum

Caput II: De exercitio magisterii ecclesiastici

Articulus I: De obiecto magisterii

Subarticulus I: De obiecto infallibilitatis directo

Subarticulus I: Solum depositum fidei apostolicum

Subarticulus II: Totum depositum fidei apostolicum

Subarticulus II: De obiecto infallibilitatis indirecto

Subarticulus I: Conclusiones theologicae

Subarticulus II: Quaestiones quaedam naturales

Subarticulus III: Facta dogmatica

Subarticulus IV: Disciplina generalis

Subarticulus V: Approbatio ordinum religiosorum

Subarticulus VI: Canonizatio sanctorum

Articulus II: De actibus magisterii

Subarticulus I: Actus infallibiles magisterii ecclesiastici

Subarticulus I: Definitiones conciliorum oecumenicorum

Subarticulus II: Magisterium totius ecclesiae dispersae

Subarticulus III: Decreta cathedralia romanorum pontificum

Subarticulus II: Actus non infallibiles magisterii ecclesiastici

Subarticulus I: Magisterium ordinarium summi pontificis

Subarticulus II: Magisterium congregationum romanarum

Subarticulus III: Magisterium ordinarium singularium episcoporum

Conclusio I: Assensus magisterio ecclesiae praestandus

Dissertatio II: De fontibus revelationis sive de regula fidei remota

Caput I: De Scriptura sacra

Articulus I: De exsistentia inspirationis

Subarticulus I: Doctrina Christi et apostolorum

Subarticulus II: Consensus patrum et theologorum

Subarticulus III: Definitio conciliorum et pontificum

Articulus II: De natura inspirationis

Subarticulus I: Notio spuria inspirationis

Subarticulus II: Notio genuina inspirationis

Articulus III: De extensione inspirationis

Subarticulus I: De inspiratione reali

Subarticulus II: De inspiratione verbali

Articulus IV: De vi inspirationis sive de inerrantia s. Scripturae

Subarticulus I: Inerrantia s. Scripturae probatur

Subarticulus II: Inerrantia s. Scripturae explicatur

Caput II: De Traditione divina

Articulus I: De exsistentia Traditionis

Subarticulus I: Testimonium oeconomiae christianae

Subarticulus II: Testimonium Scripturae apostolicae

Subarticulus III: Testimonium litteraturae patristicae

Articulus II: De monumentis Traditionis

Subarticulus I: De monumentis Traditionis in genere

Subarticulus II: De scriptis patrum

Subarticulus III: De scriptis theologorum

Scholion I: Ratio fontium fidei ad magisterium fidei

Epilogus I: Pietas christifidelium erga ecclesiam

↑ Top of work