Apologeticae sive Theologiae Fundamentalis, Tomus II (Pars Altera): Demonstratio Catholica
Hilarin Felder (1867–1951)
Apologeticae sive Theologiae Fundamentalis
First published 1920
Tomus II—Demonstratio Catholica—completes Hilarin Felder's Apologeticae sive Theologiae Fundamentalis by treating the Catholic Church as the historical bearer and interpreter of revelation. Published at Paderborn in 1920 (with the second-edition setting issued in 1923), it develops the marks, continuity, authority, and universality of the Church through biblical, historical, patristic, and scholastic argument. Read with Tomus I, it documents the structure of early twentieth-century Catholic fundamental theology and the apologetic priorities of the period. Schola presents the 1920 Latin edition with an English translation.
Prooemium
§ I: De ecclesia ut societate christifidelium
Dissertatio I: De institutione ecclesiae
Caput I: De facto ecclesiae a Christo institutae
Articulus I: Realitas ecclesiae a Christo institutae
Subarticulus I: Testimonium Christi ipsius
Subarticulus II: Testimonium apostolorum Christi
Subarticulus III: Testimonium antiquitatis christianae
Articulus II: Unicitas ecclesiae a Christo institutae
Subarticulus I: Testimonium Christi ipsius
Subarticulus II: Testimonium apostolorum Christi
Subarticulus III: Testimonium antiquitatis christianae
Caput II: De fine ecclesiae a Christo institutae
Articulus I: Finis proximus ecclesiae
Subarticulus I: Testimonium Christi
Subarticulus II: Testimonium apostolorum
Subarticulus III: Testimonium antiquitatis christianae
Articulus II: Finis remotus ecclesiae
Subarticulus I: Sententia explicatur
Subarticulus II: Sententia probatur
Caput III: De indole ecclesiae a Christo institutae
Articulus I: De indole indefectibili ecclesiae
Subarticulus I: De exsistentia indefectibili ecclesiae
Subarticulus II: De essentia indefectibili ecclesiae
Articulus II: De indole visibili ecclesiae
Subarticulus I: Argumentatio directa
Subarticulus II: Argumentatio indirecta
Articulus III: De indole supernaturali ecclesiae
Subarticulus I: Thesis principalis
Subarticulus II: Consectaria specialia
Corollaria apologetico-dogmatica
Subarticulus I: De corpore et anima ecclesiae
Subarticulus II: De membris ecclesiae
Dissertatio II: De constitutione ecclesiae
Caput I: De constitutione ecclesiae hierarchica
Articulus I: De hierarchia ecclesiae generatim
Subarticulus I: Testimonia evangelica
Subarticulus II: Testimonia apostolica
Subarticulus III: Testimonia patristica
Articulus II: De episcopatu singillatim
Subarticulus I: Documenta saeculi primi
Subarticulus II: Documenta saeculi secundi
Caput II: De constitutione ecclesiae monarchica
Articulus I: De primatu Petri apostoli
Subarticulus I: Primatus petrinus in s. Scriptura praeclare promittitur
Subarticulus II: Primatus petrinus in s. Scriptura sollemniter confertur
Subarticulus III: Primatus petrinus in s. Scriptura luculenter illustratur
Subarticulus IV: Primatus petrinus in s. Scriptura perenniter stabilitur
Articulus II: De primatu romani pontificis
Subarticulus I: Petrus romano pontifici primatum reliquit
Subarticulus II: Romani pontifices primatum sibi semper attribuerunt
Subarticulus III: Patres primatum romani pontificis semper docuerunt
Subarticulus IV: Ecclesia tota primatum romani pontificis semper agnovit
Subarticulus V: Scholia de vi et ortu primatus romani
Dissertatio III: De inventione ecclesiae
Caput I: De explicatione notarum
Articulus I: Unitas ecclesiae
Subarticulus I: Unitas confessionis symbolicae
Subarticulus II: Unitas communionis socialis
Articulus II: Sanctitas ecclesiae
Subarticulus I: Sanctitas simpliciter accepta
Subarticulus II: Sanctitas emphatice accepta
Articulus III: Catholicitas ecclesiae
Subarticulus I: Catholicitas ecclesiae determinatur
Subarticulus II: Catholicitas ecclesiae demonstratur
Articulus IV: Apostolicitas ecclesiae
Subarticulus I: Apostolicitas originis
Subarticulus II: Apostolicitas successionis
Caput II: De applicatione notarum
Articulus I: Ecclesia una
Subarticulus I: Ecclesia romana una est
Subarticulus II: Coetus antiromani non sunt uni
Articulus II: Ecclesia sancta
Subarticulus I: Ecclesia romana sancta est
Subarticulus II: Coetus antiromani non sunt sancti
Articulus III: Ecclesia catholica
Subarticulus I: Ecclesia romana catholica est
Subarticulus II: Coetus antiromani non sunt catholici
-
The Greeks, or Eastern schismatics, as the very name indicates, are found in the East alone. Hence they lack catholicity in fact. But neither are they Catholics by right. For no church can be diffused over the whole world unless it has a governance which extends itself over the whole world. But, once the primacy is denied, such governance does not belong to the Greek churches. Therefore their constitution essentially excludes catholicity. Moreover, the Greek communities do not even virtually strive for the conversion of the pagans. Just as they owe their origin to a mere defection from the Catholic Church, so afterwards, down to our own times, they have devoted themselves solely to the perversion of Catholics. The Eastern churches themselves have entirely died out.1
-
Protestants are deprived of the note of catholicity a fortiori. In fact they inhabit chiefly the German lands, England, and North America; in the other territories there are few or no followers of the pseudo-reformation. But even by right they are debarred from catholicity. The Protestant sects are essentially national, since the prince or the civil government of the individual regions is wont to be the head of the individual sects. Whence by their constitution and character they are confined within regional limits. For this reason, too, Protestants have virtually done no work for the conversion of the pagans from the sixteenth to the nineteenth century. They called missionaries "false prophets".2 They were wholly intent upon perverting Catholics, so that the saying of Tertullian applies to them: "But what shall I say about the administration of the word, since this is their business: not to convert the pagans, but to overthrow our people. They seek this glory the more, if they bring ruin upon the standing, not if they bring elevation upon the prostrate; because even their work itself comes not from their own building, but from the destruction of the truth. They undermine our foundations, that they may build their own."3 At length, in the last century, Protestants, having founded missionary societies, began to bring their religion to the pagans, with enormous sums of money indeed, but with the scantiest fruit.4
But even if the Greek or Protestant communities had material diffusion over the whole world, they would nevertheless be destitute of formal catholicity, since unity is lacking to them. Indeed, that which St. Augustine wrote concerning the sects of his own time applies to them: "Not all heretics are over the whole face of the earth, but nevertheless heretics are over the whole face of the earth. Some here, some there, yet nowhere are they wanting: they do not know themselves. One sect in Africa, another heresy in the East, another in Egypt, another in Mesopotamia, for example. In different places they are different; but one mother, pride, begot them all, just as one mother, our Catholic Church, begot all faithful Christians, diffused throughout the whole world. It is not surprising, then, if pride brings forth division, charity unity. That one [the Catholic Church] is like a vine diffused everywhere by growing; those [the heretics] are like useless branches, cut off by the farmer's sickle for the merit of their barrenness, so that the vine might be pruned, not cut away. Those branches, then, where they were cut off, there they remained. But the vine, growing through all things, knows both its own branches, which have remained in it, and, beside itself, those which have been cut off from it."5