Apologeticae sive Theologiae Fundamentalis, Tomus I: Demonstratio Christiana
Hilarin Felder (1867–1951)
Apologeticae sive Theologiae Fundamentalis
First published 1923
Hilarin Felder, O.M.Cap.'s Apologeticae sive Theologiae Fundamentalis, Tomus I—Demonstratio Christiana—is the Christian-demonstration half of a two-volume Latin manual of fundamental theology. First published at Paderborn in 1920 and revised in the second edition of 1923, it presents a neo-scholastic case for the historical revelation of Christ and the credibility of Christianity, using Scripture, history, and theological argument for classroom formation. Felder's work belongs to the mature manual tradition that shaped Catholic apologetics before the mid-century renewal. Schola presents the 1923 Latin edition with an English translation.
Praefatio
Epistola I: SS. D. Benedictus PP. XV (s. m.) opus collaudat
Introductio
§ I: Introductio theologica
Caput I: Theologiae notio
Caput II: Theologiae divisio
Caput III: Theologiae praestantia
§ II: Introductio apologetica
Caput I: Apologeticae definitio
Caput II: Apologeticae obiectum
Caput III: Apologeticae momentum
Caput IV: Apologeticae historia
Pars I: Demonstratio Christiana
§ I: Revelationis theoria
Caput I: De revelatione ontologice spectata
Articulus I: De natura revelationis
Subarticulus I: Notio revelationis
Subarticulus II: Divisio revelationis
Articulus II: De possibilitate revelationis
Subarticulus I: Possibilitas revelationis generatim
Subarticulus II: Possibilitas revelationis mysteriorum
Articulus III: De necessitate revelationis
Subarticulus I: Explicatur necessitas revelationis
Subarticulus II: Probatur necessitas revelationis
Caput II: De revelatione logice spectata
Articulus I: De criteriis revelationis in genere
Subarticulus I: Natura criteriorum
Subarticulus II: Expositio et aestimatio criteriorum
Subarticulus III: Criteria inepta
Articulus II: De miraculis
Subarticulus I: Natura miraculi
Subarticulus II: Possibilitas miraculi
Subarticulus III: Cognoscibilitas miraculi
Subarticulus IV: Simulacra miraculorum
Articulus III: De prophetiis
Subarticulus I: Natura prophetiae
Subarticulus II: Possibilitas prophetiae
Subarticulus III: Cognoscibilitas prophetiae
§ II: Revelationis exsistentia
Dissertatio I: Testimonium Iesu de messianitate et divinitate sua
Caput I: Testimonium Iesu de messianitate sua
Articulus I: Factum testimonii messiani Iesu
Subarticulus I: Factum professionis messianae Iesu generatim
Subarticulus II: Initium professionis messianae Iesu
Subarticulus III: Incrementum professionis messianae Iesu
Subarticulus IV: Complementum professionis messianae Iesu
Articulus II: Sensus testimonii messiani Iesu
§ I: Conceptus messianicus ante Iesum
Subarticulus I: Conceptus messianus Veteris Testamenti
Subarticulus II: Conceptus messianus recentioris iudaismi
§ II: Conceptus messianicus ipsius Iesu
Subarticulus I: Iesus reiecit messianismum rabbinicum et eschatologicum recentioris iudaismi
Subarticulus II: Iesus accepit et perfecit messianismum propheticum Veteris Testamenti
Jesus fully ratified the doctrine of the Old Testament concerning both the kingdom and the person of the Messiah and attributed it to himself; yet he did not simply transcribe prophetic messianism, but interpreted, illustrated, and elevated it. And indeed:
- He explains the new, universal, and spiritual kingdom of the Messiah according to the norm of the Old Testament, but more clearly, more distinctly, and more perfectly.
a) The prophets had declared more than enough that the new kingdom of the Messiah would succeed to the place of the synagogue. Nevertheless, for the most part the Jews thought that the ancient law of fear would remain in force together with the new religion of grace. Jesus, however, as is shown in detail throughout all theology, instituted faith, sacraments, and worship wholly distinct from Mosaism. He openly opposes this new religion to the old when he sets forth his truths and precepts by repeating: "It was said to the ancients ... but I say to you ...".1 This new order of things so excels the old law that the least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than John the Baptist, who nevertheless had been the greatest prophet of the old covenant and the forerunner of the new.2 Whence also the old law, strictly so called, is abrogated,3 that it may yield to the gospel of the kingdom of God: "The law and the prophets were until John: from that time the kingdom of God is preached."4
That this new religious kingdom no longer looked to the Jews alone, but would be:
b) The prophets had proclaimed a universal kingdom aloud. Nevertheless, to the readers of the Old Testament it seemed that the sons of Israel and the land of Palestine would remain pre-elected also in the messianic kingdom. And Jesus indeed, that they might have no excuse, preaches the kingdom of God, especially with the apostles, to the house of Israel.5 But he vigorously restrains the national particularism of the Jews from his kingdom. For he likens the kingdom of heaven to "a grain of mustard seed, which indeed is the least of all seeds: but when it is grown, it is greater than all herbs, and becomes a tree, so that the birds of the air come and dwell in its branches"6 To the Jews who spurn the kingdom he says: "The kingdom of God shall be taken from you and shall be given to a nation yielding its fruits."7 Nay more, he commands the apostles: "Going into the whole world, preach the gospel to every creature."8 And although the kingdom of God spreads only gradually, nevertheless before the judgment it will be propagated throughout the whole earth: "This gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in the whole world, for a testimony to all nations: and then shall the consummation come."9
That this kingdom of the gospel would in no way be political and material, but wholly:
c) A spiritual kingdom is undoubtedly concluded from the Old Testament. Nevertheless, the prophets depicted the messianic kingdom under the type of an earthly kingdom so vividly that the Jews understood the messianic goods as political and sensual realities favorably disposed. Against this, Jesus, as we have abundantly proved, firmly and consistently declines the political conception of the kingdom of God. With the same care he repels the sensual conception of the kingdom. He only took care that those seeking the spiritual kingdom should not lack what is necessary for sustenance on this earth: "Seek ye first the kingdom of God and his justice, and all these things shall be added unto you."10 He certainly compares the delights of the kingdom in heaven to a banquet,11 signifying, however, by this simile only the "eternal life" of the vision and fruition of God.12
- Likewise, he defines the person of the Messiah exactly according to the Old Testament as Son of David, Son of man, Servant of God, Son of God. But he explains these messianic titles and accommodates them to himself in such a way as to exclude all ambiguity and false interpretation.
a) In the Old Testament the Messiah is everywhere declared to be the Son of David.13 Yet incautious and carnal men wrongly interpreted this of the Messiah as a political king of the Jews. Whence it was of the greatest concern to Jesus both to avert this error of the Jews and nevertheless to fulfill the prophecy concerning the Son of David. Jesus enters this world hailed by the angel as Son of David.14 The Gospels repeatedly testify that he traces his origin from the seed of David.15 He tacitly approves the crowds when he is saluted by them as Son of David.16 He heals the sick whenever they invoke him: "Have mercy on us, Son of David."17 But he never calls himself Son of David, lest he should be regarded by the Jews as the Messiah, a temporal king.18
For the rest, he insists less on the glorious title of Son of David, because he chiefly wished to be regarded as:
b) Servant of God: Jesus, the Savior, the redeemer of sins. As such the Messiah had been foretold in the Old Testament. But because these prophecies of the vicarious redemption of sins to be accomplished through the Messiah seemed rarer and more obscure, they were consigned to oblivion by the carnal messianism of the Jews. On the contrary, they wholly fill the gospel. Already the angel imposes and interprets the very name of Jesus: "And thou shalt call his name Jesus: for he shall save his people from their sins."19 Jesus constantly retains this name and this mission of the Savior.20 He spends his whole life in order to redeem and remit sins.21 Nay more, he bestows even bodily benefits upon men, "that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Isaias the prophet, saying [of the Servant of God]: He took our infirmities, and bore our diseases."22 A fortiori Jesus undergoes passion and death to that very end, that he might loose the whole human race from the bonds of sins: "As Moses lifted up the serpent in the desert, even so must the Son of man be lifted up: that whosoever believeth in him may not perish, but may have life everlasting... For God sent not his Son into the world, to judge the world, but that the world may be saved by him ... I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd giveth his life for his sheep."23 "The Son of man is not come to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a redemption for many."24
"This is my body, which is given for you ... This is my blood of the new testament, which shall be shed for many unto remission of sins."25
c) The Son of man, as he is described by Daniel 7, 23 sq., delineates only the eschatological person of the Messiah. Whence the Jewish apocalypse falsely interpreted that passage of an exclusively eschatological messianism. Jesus, however, both overturns this error and completes the prophecy itself. For under the title of Son of man he comprehends both his messianic life and activity on earth,26 and the glory of the heavenly judge and king.27
There remains the most exalted quality by which the Messiah is named in the Old Testament:
d) Son of God, or Emmanuel. That Jesus also conspicuously explained and assigned to himself this messianic title, testifying to his divine nature and filiation, will be shown at greater length presently.