Apologeticae sive Theologiae Fundamentalis, Tomus I: Demonstratio Christiana

Hilarin Felder

Apologeticae sive Theologiae Fundamentalis, Tomus I: Demonstratio Christiana

Hilarin Felder (1867–1951)

Apologeticae sive Theologiae Fundamentalis

First published 1923

Hilarin Felder, O.M.Cap.'s Apologeticae sive Theologiae Fundamentalis, Tomus I—Demonstratio Christiana—is the Christian-demonstration half of a two-volume Latin manual of fundamental theology. First published at Paderborn in 1920 and revised in the second edition of 1923, it presents a neo-scholastic case for the historical revelation of Christ and the credibility of Christianity, using Scripture, history, and theological argument for classroom formation. Felder's work belongs to the mature manual tradition that shaped Catholic apologetics before the mid-century renewal. Schola presents the 1923 Latin edition with an English translation.


Praefatio

Epistola I: SS. D. Benedictus PP. XV (s. m.) opus collaudat

Introductio

§ I: Introductio theologica

Caput I: Theologiae notio

Caput II: Theologiae divisio

Caput III: Theologiae praestantia

§ II: Introductio apologetica

Caput I: Apologeticae definitio

Caput II: Apologeticae obiectum

Caput III: Apologeticae momentum

Caput IV: Apologeticae historia

Pars I: Demonstratio Christiana

§ I: Revelationis theoria

Caput I: De revelatione ontologice spectata

Articulus I: De natura revelationis

Subarticulus I: Notio revelationis

Subarticulus II: Divisio revelationis

Supernatural revelation is specified by reason of the object that is manifested, by reason of the mode in which it is manifested, and by reason of the end for which it is manifested.

  1. By reason of the object that is manifested, revelation is either formal or material. That revelation is called formal whose formal object alone (the motive of assent) is supernatural; that is called material whose material object (the argument) as well is supernatural.

Formal revelation, therefore, contains truths that are natural in themselves and on that account accessible to human reason (e.g. the existence of God, the immortality of the soul). For whatever things are natural are also capable of being perceived by natural light. There are, to be sure, countless things in the bowels of the earth or in the firmament of heaven that escape rational cognition, e.g. the number of stars, the essence of electricity, of light, of matter, of animal and vegetative life. Yet these truths remain hidden only per accidens, not per se. They escape the grasp of reason because of external difficulties, not because of their substance or matter itself. If, therefore, they are divinely revealed, they become supernatural with respect to the formal object (or motive or principle) by which they are made known to us; yet they remain natural with respect to the material object (or argument or substance) of the truth itself.

Material revelation, on the other hand, contains truths that are not natural in themselves and on that account are inaccessible to human reason. The very matter (substance or argument) of these truths is such that it cannot be known without revelation.

But a truth to be known can be inaccessible to reason in two ways: either absolutely (simpliciter) or only relatively (relative seu secundum quid).

That truth exceeds reason secundum quid whose existence reason cannot prove before revelation, but whose essence it is able to grasp after revelation, e.g. the institution of the Church, the infallibility of the Roman Pontiff. That these truths exist, reason cannot prove with certainty before revelation, although it can affirm their possibility or even their probability. After revelation, however, reason can understand what these truths are, how they are, and why they are. Hence they are rightly called praeterrational truths, or mysteries secundum quid (broadly so called, of the second degree).

That truth exceeds reason simpliciter whose existence reason in no way can prove without revelation, and whose essence it cannot grasp even after revelation has been made. For this reason truths of this sort are called suprarational truths, or mysteries simpliciter (strictly so called, of the first degree), e.g. the mystery of the Trinity. Reason left to itself can prove the existence of the Trinity neither as certain, nor as probable, nor even as possible. Through revelation, however, it learns with certainty that the Trinity is; it also partly understands, i.e. by analogous notions, what the Trinity is; finally it shadows forth at least somewhat, by fitting similitudes, how and why there is a Trinity of persons in God.

  1. By reason of the mode in which it takes place, revelation is either mediate or immediate.

It is immediate when God Himself communicates the truth with no legate interposed; it is mediate when God manifests the truth through a legate. The revelation that Moses, the prophets, and the apostles received was immediate; the revelation that the Israelites received through Moses, and Christians through the apostles, is mediate.

In immediate revelation God must so affect the cognitive faculties that man clearly perceives the truth that is communicated, and knows with certainty that it is communicated to him by God. Since, however, the cognitive faculty is threefold, immediate revelation is likewise distinguished into a threefold kind: sensitive, imaginative, and intellective.

It is sensitive when God speaks to the external senses by voices and other sensible signs. To this belong not only audible voices, but also theophanies (God appearing in the flame of the bush; Daniel seeing the writing on the wall), symbolic visions (Peter seeing unclean animals), and types (the paschal lamb; the bronze serpent; the sacrifice of Melchisedech). Imaginative revelation is present when God opens the truth through a power or influence upon the internal senses. This He can indeed do either by impressing imaginary forms not received through the senses (for instance, if likenesses of colors were impressed in the imagination of one born blind) or even by forms divinely ordered from those that have been received from the senses (Jeremiah 1, 13 seeing a boiling pot; Amos 8, 1 a basket of summer fruit). Intellective revelation consists in this, that God produces intelligible species in the mind itself, as in an internal vision, in prophetic illumination, very often in ecstasy, and likewise in those men who receive infused knowledge and wisdom.

In mediate revelation God must make men certain that the immediate revelation from which the mediate one is derived is true and divine; in other words: the preacher of revelation must prove that he is sent by God and is a legate for communicating the truth to men. But this divine mission He can render certain by divine signs, especially by miracles and by fulfilled prophecies.

  1. By reason of the end for which it takes place, revelation is either private or public.

Private revelation is that which is given for the benefit of one man alone, or at least not of all men. The persons to whom private revelation has been made are bound to believe it with divine faith; the rest, however, neither ought nor can believe it with divine faith, since such a revelation does not pertain to them. Moreover, certainty of its divine origin is had only most rarely; indeed, even the Church in approving private revelations does not declare them truly to be divine, but only that they contain nothing contrary to faith and morals. It is not lawful, however, to despise them, since they are probably divine and certainly useful.

Public revelation is that which is given for the common benefit of all men, namely to found, to develop, and to complete the true religion for the whole human race. It is of this revelation alone that we shall treat.

Articulus II: De possibilitate revelationis

Subarticulus I: Possibilitas revelationis generatim

Subarticulus II: Possibilitas revelationis mysteriorum

Articulus III: De necessitate revelationis

Subarticulus I: Explicatur necessitas revelationis

Subarticulus II: Probatur necessitas revelationis

Caput II: De revelatione logice spectata

Articulus I: De criteriis revelationis in genere

Subarticulus I: Natura criteriorum

Subarticulus II: Expositio et aestimatio criteriorum

Subarticulus III: Criteria inepta

Articulus II: De miraculis

Subarticulus I: Natura miraculi

Subarticulus II: Possibilitas miraculi

Subarticulus III: Cognoscibilitas miraculi

Subarticulus IV: Simulacra miraculorum

Articulus III: De prophetiis

Subarticulus I: Natura prophetiae

Subarticulus II: Possibilitas prophetiae

Subarticulus III: Cognoscibilitas prophetiae

§ II: Revelationis exsistentia

Dissertatio I: Testimonium Iesu de messianitate et divinitate sua

Caput I: Testimonium Iesu de messianitate sua

Articulus I: Factum testimonii messiani Iesu

Subarticulus I: Factum professionis messianae Iesu generatim

Subarticulus II: Initium professionis messianae Iesu

Subarticulus III: Incrementum professionis messianae Iesu

Subarticulus IV: Complementum professionis messianae Iesu

Articulus II: Sensus testimonii messiani Iesu

§ I: Conceptus messianicus ante Iesum

Subarticulus I: Conceptus messianus Veteris Testamenti

Subarticulus II: Conceptus messianus recentioris iudaismi

§ II: Conceptus messianicus ipsius Iesu

Subarticulus I: Iesus reiecit messianismum rabbinicum et eschatologicum recentioris iudaismi

Subarticulus II: Iesus accepit et perfecit messianismum propheticum Veteris Testamenti

Caput II: Testimonium Iesu de divinitate sua

Articulus I: De divinitate Iesu manifestata ante ipsius mortem

Subarticulus I: Iesus se ipse confitetur esse Deum simpliciter

Subarticulus II: Iesus se ipse confitetur esse Filium Dei naturalem

Articulus II: De divinitate Iesu manifestata post ipsius mortem

Subarticulus I: Divinitas Iesu a resurrectione usque ad ascensionem

Subarticulus II: Divinitas Iesu in ecclesia primigenia

Subarticulus III: Divinitas Iesu apud S. Paulum

Subarticulus IV: Divinitas Iesu apud S. Ioannem

Dissertatio II: Argumenta Iesu pro messianitate et divinitate sua

Caput I: Character Iesu

Articulus I: Character intellectualis Iesu

Subarticulus I: Iesus nulla insaniae signa dedit

Subarticulus II: Iesus summa sapientiae signa praesetulit

Articulus II: Character moralis Iesu

Subarticulus I: Iesus immunis fuit ab omni peccato

Subarticulus II: Iesus insignis fuit summa virtute

Caput II: Vaticinia Iesu

Articulus I: Vaticinia Veteris Testamenti de Iesu Christo edita

Subarticulus I: Vaticinia de genealogia Christi

Subarticulus II: Vaticinia de chronologia Christi

Subarticulus III: Vaticinia de biographia Christi

Articulus II: Vaticinia Novi Testamenti a Iesu Christo edita

Subarticulus I: Vaticinia Christi quoad res simpliciter occultas

Subarticulus II: Vaticinia Christi quoad res simpliciter futuras

Caput III: Miracula Iesu

Articulus I: Veritas historica miraculorum Iesu

Subarticulus I: Documenta historica miraculorum Iesu

Subarticulus II: Critica historica miraculorum Iesu

Articulus II: Veritas philosophica miraculorum Iesu

Subarticulus I: Sanationes infirmorum

Subarticulus II: Eiectiones daemonum

Subarticulus III: Dominatio virium naturalium

Subarticulus IV: Resuscitationes mortuorum

Caput IV: Resurrectio Iesu

Articulus I: Demonstratio factorum

Subarticulus I: Fides discipulorum Iesu

Subarticulus II: Monumentum Iesu vacuum

Subarticulus III: Apparitiones Iesu redivivi

Articulus II: Explicatio factorum

Subarticulus I: Explicatio fidei discipulorum

Subarticulus II: Explicatio monumenti Iesu vacui

Subarticulus III: Explicatio apparitionum Iesu redivivi

Conclusio I: Conclusio demonstrationis christianae

↑ Top of work