Apologeticae sive Theologiae Fundamentalis, Tomus I: Demonstratio Christiana

Hilarin Felder

Apologeticae sive Theologiae Fundamentalis, Tomus I: Demonstratio Christiana

Hilarin Felder (1867–1951)

Apologeticae sive Theologiae Fundamentalis

First published 1923

Hilarin Felder, O.M.Cap.'s Apologeticae sive Theologiae Fundamentalis, Tomus I—Demonstratio Christiana—is the Christian-demonstration half of a two-volume Latin manual of fundamental theology. First published at Paderborn in 1920 and revised in the second edition of 1923, it presents a neo-scholastic case for the historical revelation of Christ and the credibility of Christianity, using Scripture, history, and theological argument for classroom formation. Felder's work belongs to the mature manual tradition that shaped Catholic apologetics before the mid-century renewal. Schola presents the 1923 Latin edition with an English translation.


Praefatio

Epistola I: SS. D. Benedictus PP. XV (s. m.) opus collaudat

Introductio

§ I: Introductio theologica

Caput I: Theologiae notio

Caput II: Theologiae divisio

Caput III: Theologiae praestantia

§ II: Introductio apologetica

Caput I: Apologeticae definitio

Caput II: Apologeticae obiectum

Caput III: Apologeticae momentum

From what has been said thus far it is clear that apologetics is of great importance objectively for the true religion. Hence it is also concluded that apologetics is of remarkable value subjectively for those who either seek or cultivate the true faith and religion.

a) For infidels seeking religion, it paves the way to faith. Indeed, no one can believe unless he has first certainly known the fact of revelation. Innocent XI condemned the thesis: "The supernatural assent of faith, which is useful for salvation, is compatible with a merely probable knowledge of the revelation, and even with the fear by which one fears that God has not spoken."

Reasonably, therefore, no one can embrace the faith unless he is persuaded that the Christian-Catholic revelation is given by God.

On the contrary, no one who is persuaded of this foundation of the true religion can reasonably repel the faith. For if it stands by irrefutable arguments that God is the author of the revelation, it also stands that this revelation is reasonably credible. Accordingly, in proving the fact of revelation the apologist leads the infidel by the hand as far as the very gates of faith.

Nevertheless, he cannot compel the unwilling to enter, nor can he bring the willing into the temple of faith. He cannot compel the unwilling to believe. For reason alone is compelled to assent by the evidence of the thing. The fact of revelation, however, is proved in apologetics as certain indeed, but not evident. He cannot endow the willing with faith. For apologetics alone sets forth rational motives, supported by which the intellect forms the natural judgment of the credibility of the faith. Faith itself, however, is the assent given to revelation from a supernatural motive, that is, on account of the authority of God revealing. Hence, to produce the act of faith, grace must concur with human reason.

Human reasoning about credibility is a condition sine qua non of faith; divine aid, however, is the cause that causes faith.

The infidel, therefore, should indeed devote himself to study, but let him pray much more earnestly that he may obtain the gift of faith from God.

b) The faithful also profit much from apologetic study. Indeed, the apologetic arguments do not directly and intrinsically increase the power and firmness of faith. For its supernatural certainty infinitely exceeds every certainty acquired by mere reason. Indirectly, however, and extrinsically, faith is greatly aided by the apologetic motives of credibility. These motives remove the obstacles to faith heaped up by adversaries; they build bulwarks around the citadel of faith; they show the excellence, sublimity, and beauty of faith, and thereby fill the minds of the faithful with reverence, love, gratitude, and alacrity for performing those things that belong to faith.

The faithful need this apologetic aid the more, the more they advance in profane sciences. Indeed, the unlearned and those who are ignorant of the subtleties of unbelieving science do not require a learned foundation of faith. By the testimony of parents and by common religious discipline they are fully convinced of the credibility of the faith. But the higher scientific erudition, the deeper also the motives of credibility reason requires, and the more frequent the communion with learned infidels, the more that saying of St. Peter urges: "Let us be always ready to give satisfaction (πρὸς ἀπολογίαν) to every one that asketh us a reason of that hope which is in us."

Above all, however, of all men the theologian ought to be perfect in apologetics. This is evident both from the nature of theology and from the circumstances of our time.

For theology is the science of divine things drawn from revelation. Revelation is the principle and source of all theological truth. But since only apologetics proves the scientific certainty of revelation, theology without apologetics lacks a source, lacks a principle, lacks a foundation, lacks the character of a true science.

The circumstances of our time still further increase the necessity of the study of fundamental theology. Nearly all the enemies of the true religion today do not so much attack the individual dogmas of the faith as rather the very foundation of the faith. Modern men no longer call into doubt the individual truths which Christ preached and which the Church of Christ proposes; rather, they deny the very authority and infallibility of the Church, they deny the very divine legation and nature of Christ, they deny the very fact of revelation, not to say natural religion itself. Accordingly, we likewise must be wholly engaged in so establishing and defending these foundations of our faith on every side.

Caput IV: Apologeticae historia

Pars I: Demonstratio Christiana

§ I: Revelationis theoria

Caput I: De revelatione ontologice spectata

Articulus I: De natura revelationis

Subarticulus I: Notio revelationis

Subarticulus II: Divisio revelationis

Articulus II: De possibilitate revelationis

Subarticulus I: Possibilitas revelationis generatim

Subarticulus II: Possibilitas revelationis mysteriorum

Articulus III: De necessitate revelationis

Subarticulus I: Explicatur necessitas revelationis

Subarticulus II: Probatur necessitas revelationis

Caput II: De revelatione logice spectata

Articulus I: De criteriis revelationis in genere

Subarticulus I: Natura criteriorum

Subarticulus II: Expositio et aestimatio criteriorum

Subarticulus III: Criteria inepta

Articulus II: De miraculis

Subarticulus I: Natura miraculi

Subarticulus II: Possibilitas miraculi

Subarticulus III: Cognoscibilitas miraculi

Subarticulus IV: Simulacra miraculorum

Articulus III: De prophetiis

Subarticulus I: Natura prophetiae

Subarticulus II: Possibilitas prophetiae

Subarticulus III: Cognoscibilitas prophetiae

§ II: Revelationis exsistentia

Dissertatio I: Testimonium Iesu de messianitate et divinitate sua

Caput I: Testimonium Iesu de messianitate sua

Articulus I: Factum testimonii messiani Iesu

Subarticulus I: Factum professionis messianae Iesu generatim

Subarticulus II: Initium professionis messianae Iesu

Subarticulus III: Incrementum professionis messianae Iesu

Subarticulus IV: Complementum professionis messianae Iesu

Articulus II: Sensus testimonii messiani Iesu

§ I: Conceptus messianicus ante Iesum

Subarticulus I: Conceptus messianus Veteris Testamenti

Subarticulus II: Conceptus messianus recentioris iudaismi

§ II: Conceptus messianicus ipsius Iesu

Subarticulus I: Iesus reiecit messianismum rabbinicum et eschatologicum recentioris iudaismi

Subarticulus II: Iesus accepit et perfecit messianismum propheticum Veteris Testamenti

Caput II: Testimonium Iesu de divinitate sua

Articulus I: De divinitate Iesu manifestata ante ipsius mortem

Subarticulus I: Iesus se ipse confitetur esse Deum simpliciter

Subarticulus II: Iesus se ipse confitetur esse Filium Dei naturalem

Articulus II: De divinitate Iesu manifestata post ipsius mortem

Subarticulus I: Divinitas Iesu a resurrectione usque ad ascensionem

Subarticulus II: Divinitas Iesu in ecclesia primigenia

Subarticulus III: Divinitas Iesu apud S. Paulum

Subarticulus IV: Divinitas Iesu apud S. Ioannem

Dissertatio II: Argumenta Iesu pro messianitate et divinitate sua

Caput I: Character Iesu

Articulus I: Character intellectualis Iesu

Subarticulus I: Iesus nulla insaniae signa dedit

Subarticulus II: Iesus summa sapientiae signa praesetulit

Articulus II: Character moralis Iesu

Subarticulus I: Iesus immunis fuit ab omni peccato

Subarticulus II: Iesus insignis fuit summa virtute

Caput II: Vaticinia Iesu

Articulus I: Vaticinia Veteris Testamenti de Iesu Christo edita

Subarticulus I: Vaticinia de genealogia Christi

Subarticulus II: Vaticinia de chronologia Christi

Subarticulus III: Vaticinia de biographia Christi

Articulus II: Vaticinia Novi Testamenti a Iesu Christo edita

Subarticulus I: Vaticinia Christi quoad res simpliciter occultas

Subarticulus II: Vaticinia Christi quoad res simpliciter futuras

Caput III: Miracula Iesu

Articulus I: Veritas historica miraculorum Iesu

Subarticulus I: Documenta historica miraculorum Iesu

Subarticulus II: Critica historica miraculorum Iesu

Articulus II: Veritas philosophica miraculorum Iesu

Subarticulus I: Sanationes infirmorum

Subarticulus II: Eiectiones daemonum

Subarticulus III: Dominatio virium naturalium

Subarticulus IV: Resuscitationes mortuorum

Caput IV: Resurrectio Iesu

Articulus I: Demonstratio factorum

Subarticulus I: Fides discipulorum Iesu

Subarticulus II: Monumentum Iesu vacuum

Subarticulus III: Apparitiones Iesu redivivi

Articulus II: Explicatio factorum

Subarticulus I: Explicatio fidei discipulorum

Subarticulus II: Explicatio monumenti Iesu vacui

Subarticulus III: Explicatio apparitionum Iesu redivivi

Conclusio I: Conclusio demonstrationis christianae

↑ Top of work