De inspiratione sacrae Scripturae: theologica disquisitio

Louis Billot

De inspiratione sacrae Scripturae: theologica disquisitio

Louis Billot (1846–1931)

First published 1906

Louis Billot's theological treatise on the inspiration of Sacred Scripture, in the second edition (Rome, 1906). The edition prints the full treatise with its prooemium, two parts, index and approbation. The separately titled De immutabilitate traditionis (1907), bound after it, is excluded.


Titlepage I: Title Page

Prooemium I: Proem

Pars I: Part One — On the Inspiration of Sacred Scripture

Introductio I: Introduction

Capitulum I: Chapter One. — Where the Dogmatic Notion of Inspiration Is Declared.

Sectio I: § 1. — That All and Each of the Books of Scripture Are to Be Held Sacred and Canonical

Sectio II: § 2. — That God Is the Author of the Books of the New and Old Testament

Sectio III: § 3. — That It Could Be Understood in Two Ways That Scripture Was Written under the Dictation of the Holy Spirit

Capitulum II: Chapter Two. — Where the Notion of Inspiration Is Further Elaborated.

Sectio I: § 1. — That the Reception of Knowledge of the Things to Be Written Is Indeed among the Prerequisites to Inspiration

Sectio II: § 2. — That Inspiration Formally Consists in a Motion of the Intellect and Will

Sectio III: § 3. — Where Certain Conclusions Flowing from the Notion of Inspiration Elucidated Thus Far Are Explained.

Pars II: Part Two — On the Things That Follow upon Inspiration

Introductio I: Introduction

Capitulum I: Chapter One. — On the Spiritual Sense of Sacred Scripture.

Sectio I: § 1. — The Quiddity and Existence of the Spiritual Sense.

Sectio II: § 2. — Conclusions against the Broad School of Biblical Scholars.

Capitulum II: Chapter Two. — On the Intention of Scripture, Terminated of Itself upon Matters of Faith and Morals.

Sectio I: § 1. — What Should Be Understood by the Name of Matters of Faith and Morals Pertaining to the Edification of Christian Doctrine.

Sectio II: § 2. The Most Grievous Error of Biblical Scholars in This Matter.

Capitulum III: Chapter Three. — On the Inerrancy of Sacred Scripture.

Status I: State of the Question

Sectio I: § 1. — The Reasons of Those Who Admitted Errors in the Bible.

Sectio II: § 2. — Confutation.

Sectio III: § 3. — The Encyclical Providentissimus Deus.

Hence Leo XIII in the encyclical Providentissimus Deus: « It is to be lamented that there are many who search out and bring forward the monuments of antiquity, the customs and institutions of nations, and the testimonies of similar matters, with great labors indeed, but more often with this design, that they may detect the stain of error in the sacred books, and thereby weaken and make totter their authority on every side. And some do this with too hostile a mind, and not with judgment sufficiently fair. For they trust profane books and records of ancient memory as if no suspicion even of error could attach to them, while to the books of Sacred Scripture, on the mere supposed appearance of error, and that not well examined, they refuse even equal credit. It can indeed happen that certain things have fallen out less correctly through copyists in transcribing the codices; but this is to be judged considerately, and not easily admitted, unless it has been duly demonstrated in particular places. It can also happen that the genuine sense of some passage remains uncertain, for the unraveling of which the best rules of interpretation will contribute much.

But it would be altogether impious either to narrow inspiration to certain parts only of Sacred Scripture, or to concede that the sacred author himself has erred. Nor indeed is their reasoning to be tolerated, who extricate themselves from these difficulties by not doubting to grant this: that divine inspiration pertains to matters of faith and morals, and to nothing beyond, because they falsely think that, when the truth of sentences is at issue, it is not so much to be inquired what God has said, as rather to be weighed for what cause He said it. For all and entire books... have been written with the Holy Spirit dictating. So far indeed is any error from being able to underlie divine inspiration, that it of itself not only excludes all error, but excludes and rejects it as necessarily as it is necessary that God, the supreme Truth, be the author of no error at all. « This is the ancient and constant faith of the Church ».

Convinced therefore by these arguments and authorities, most biblical scholars, at least in words, have withdrawn from the inconsiderate concession of errors in the Scriptures. But now they have devised new ways of speaking which, as far as the matter is concerned, fall back into the same thing. Of these it now comes to be said in the chapter that follows.

Capitulum IV: Chapter Four. — On the Literary Forms of Sacred Scripture.

Status I: State of the Question

Sectio I: § 1. — An Ingenious Invention for Reconciling the Inerrancy of Scripture with the Material Falsity of Its Assertions.

Sectio II: § 2. — Confutation of the System, First as Regards Its General Principles.

Capitulum V: Chapter Five. — On the Interpretation of Sacred Scripture.

Sectio I: § 1. — On the Legitimate Sense of the Tridentine Decree concerning the Use and Interpretation of the Sacred Books.

Sectio II: § 2. — On the Things That Follow from This Decree.

Sectio III: § 3. — Epilogue.

Index I: Index

Approbatio I: Approbation of the Work

↑ Top of work