Palladium theologicum, Tomus quintus: De virtutibus
Gaudenzio da Brescia (1612–1672)
Reuerendi patris Gaudentij Bontempi, ... Palladium theologicum, seu Tota theologia scholastica in septem tomos distributa. Ad intimam mentem d. Bonauenturae seraphici doctoris ... Tomus quintus, De virtutibus
First published 1676
Bontempi's Palladium theologicum (Lyon 1676) is a complete scholastic theology composed ad mentem D. Bonaventurae, arranged in seven tractatus on the order of the Secunda secundae. This fifth volume, De virtutibus, treats the theological virtues (faith, hope, charity, with their gifts, beatitudes and fruits), the cardinal virtues and their opposite vices, and the states and offices of men (religious and prelates, bishops, princes), including the extensive disputations on contracts, religion, vows, fortitude, temperance and the judicial process. It is a significant example of the Bonaventurian scholastic school and a counterpart to the Thomist manuals of the period.
Tractatus I: PRIMUS DE VIRTUTIBUS THEOLOGICIS
Proemium I: Prooemium
Disputatio I: ON FAITH
Quaestio I: What FAITH signifies, and what it is
Quaestio II: What the object of FAITH is
Quaestio III: Whether the object of FAITH is something complex
Quaestio IV: Whether the object of FAITH can be false
Quaestio V: Whether the object of FAITH can be evident scientifically
Quaestio VI: Whether FAITH is concerned with those things which are seen by vision on the way
Quaestio VII: Whether the articles of FAITH are evidently credible
Quaestio VIII: Whether the things to be believed are rightly arranged according to the articles
Quaestio IX: Whether the articles of FAITH have grown over the course of time
Quaestio X: Whether FAITH has grown as regards light
Quaestio XI: Whether Faith has grown in certitude
Quaestio XII: Whether the articles of Faith are to be expounded by some authority which is an infallible teacher, and what it is
Quaestio XIII: What are the marks of the true Church, in which the authority of expounding FAITH resides
Quaestio XIV: What must be believed by the necessity of means
Quaestio XV: What things are to be believed by the necessity of precept
Quaestio XVI: Whether we are bound to confess FAITH, and when
Quaestio XVII: Whether it is lawful to dispute about FAITH, and when
Quaestio XVIII: Whether Faith resides in the Intellect
Quaestio XIX: Whether Faith is perfected by Charity, as by its form
Quaestio XX: Whether it is certain that FAITH remains without CHARITY
Quaestio XXI: Whether, and how, FAITH is a VIRTUE
Quaestio XXII: Whether FAITH is ONE VIRTUE
Quaestio XXIII: Whether FAITH is the first of the Virtues
Quaestio XXIV: Whether FAITH is more certain than any science, or than any intellectual habit
Quaestio XXV: Whether one can know with certainty that he has FAITH
Quaestio XXVI: In whom FAITH is found
Quaestio XXVII: Whether FAITH is a substantial Gift of GOD
Quaestio XXVIII: Whether the difference between FAITH and other acts, natural as opposed to supernatural moral acts, always arises from the object
Quaestio XXIX: On the effects of FAITH
Quaestio XXX: On the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING
Dubitatio I: Whether UNDERSTANDING is a gift of the Holy Ghost
Dubitatio II: Whether the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING can coexist with FAITH
Dubitatio III: Whether the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING consists in the contemplation of the Creator and of Creation
Dubitatio IV: Whether the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING is found in all who have grace, and whether in these alone
Dubitatio V: What is the necessity and utility of the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING
Dubitatio VI: Whether* **the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING** *corresponds to the sixth beatitude, namely, Blessed are the clean of heart, etc.
Dubitatio VII: Whether* **to the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING** *there corresponds, among the fruits of the Holy Ghost, Faith
Quaestio XXXI: On the Gift of Knowledge
Dubitatio I: Whether* **KNOWLEDGE** *is a gift of the Holy Ghost
Dubitatio II: Whether knowledge is concerned with Divine things
Dubitatio III: Whether the gift of knowledge is speculative
Dubitatio IV: Whether the third Beatitude corresponds to the Gift of Knowledge: Blessed are they that mourn, etc.
Disputatio II: On Unbelief
Quaestio I: What UNBELIEF is, and what kind of sin it is
Quaestio II: Whether all the works of unbelievers are sins
Quaestio III: Whether unbelievers can be compelled to hear FAITH
Quaestio IV: Whether unbelievers can be compelled to embrace our FAITH, when it has been sufficiently set forth
Quaestio V: Whether unbaptized unbelievers can be compelled to abandon errors or rites contrary to natural reason
Quaestio VI: Whether the rites of unbelievers are to be permitted
Quaestio VII: Whether it is lawful to make agreements with unbelievers about the toleration of their rites
Quaestio VIII: Whether unbaptized unbelievers can retain power over the Faithful, and whether they can be deprived of it
Disputatio III: On Heresy
Quaestio I: What HERESY is
Quaestio II: Whether one who doubts about the articles of FAITH is a heretic
Quaestio III: Whether one who gives merely opinionative assent to an article of FAITH is a heretic
Quaestio IV: Whether, and what, Ignorance excuses from Heresy
Quaestio V: What pertinacity is required for HERESY
Quaestio VI: Whether, for one to be deemed a Heretic, it is necessary that he have been baptized and a believer
Quaestio VII: Whether the Church can compel heretics to receive the Catholic FAITH
Quaestio VIII: On the other means the Church uses against heretics, by forbidding their Books
Quaestio IX: Whether we are bound to avoid the conversation of heretics
Quaestio X: What excommunication is inflicted upon heretics
Quaestio XI: On the other spiritual punishments of heretics
Quaestio XII: On the temporal punishments of Heretics
Disputatio IV: On Hope
Quaestio I: What HOPE is
Quaestio II: What the material object of HOPE is
Question III
Quaestio IV: Whether a certain object is set forth for HOPE, and is hoped for
Quaestio V: Whether Hope is a Virtue
Quaestio VI: Whether HOPE is a Theological Virtue
Quaestio VII: Whether HOPE is at times formless
Quaestio VIII: Whether HOPE arises from merits
Quaestio IX: Whether Hope precedes Charity
Quaestio X: What the proximate subject of HOPE is
Quaestio XI: Whether HOPE remains in the Blessed
Quaestio XII: Whether there is a precept of hoping in GOD
Dubitatio I: UNICA. Would this precept bind one to whom certain damnation had been revealed
Disputatio V: On the Gift of Fear
Quaestio I: Whether FEAR is a Habit distinct from HOPE
Quaestio II: What the object of FEAR is
Quaestio III: Whether worldly Fear is always evil
Quaestio IV: Whether servile Fear is honorable, and a Gift of God
Quaestio V: Whether servile Fear is cast out when grace comes
Quaestio VI: Whether Initial and Filial Fear differ specifically
Quaestio VII: Whether, as Charity grows, Fear diminishes
Quaestio VIII: Whether gratuitous Fear remains in the fatherland
Quaestio IX: Whether Poverty of Spirit corresponds to the GIFT OF FEAR
Quaestio X: On the Effects, and the precept, of the FEAR OF GOD
Disputatio VI: On Despair
Quaestio I: UNICA. Of what power DESPAIR is an act, and what sin it is
Disputatio VII: On Presumption
Quaestio I: What PRESUMPTION is, and what kind of sin
Disputatio VIII: On Charity
Quaestio I: What CHARITY is
Quaestio II: What the object of Charity is
Quaestio III: Whether Charity is properly the friendship of God
Quaestio IV: Whether Charity is a created Habit
Quaestio V: Whether Charity is one special Virtue
Quaestio VI: Whether Charity is of a most special species
Quaestio VII: Whether Charity is the most excellent of the virtues
Quaestio VIII: Whether Charity is the Form of the Virtues
Quaestio IX: Whether besides infused Charity there is another charity, acquired by our own acts
Quaestio X: Whether Charity can be formless
Quaestio XI: Whether CHARITY increases, and how
Quaestio XII: Whether, and how, CHARITY in this life is perfect
Quaestio XIII: Whether Charity can be lost, and how
Quaestio XIV: What is the proximate subject of Charity
Quaestio XV: Whether God alone is to be loved out of Charity, or the neighbor also
Quaestio XVI: Whether Charity is to be loved out of Charity
Quaestio XVII: Whether all gratuitous gifts are to be loved out of CHARITY
Quaestio XVIII: Whether irrational creatures are to be loved out of CHARITY
Quaestio XIX: Whether a man ought to love himself out of CHARITY
Quaestio XX: Whether a man ought to love his own body out of Charity
Quaestio XXI: Whether sinners are to be loved out of Charity
Quaestio XXII: Whether it is necessary to love enemies out of CHARITY
Quaestio XXIII: Whether we are bound to show the effects of CHARITY toward enemies, and which
Quaestio XXIV: Whether Angels are to be loved out of CHARITY
Quaestio XXV: Whether Demons, and the Damned, are to be loved out of CHARITY
Quaestio XXVI: Whether it is fitting that four things to be loved out of CHARITY are enumerated
Quaestio XXVII: Whether God, and the neighbor, are loved with the same habit of CHARITY
Quaestio XXVIII: Whether there is order in CHARITY
Quaestio XXIX: Whether GOD is to be loved more than the neighbor
Quaestio XXX: Whether a man ought out of CHARITY to love God more than himself
Quaestio XXXI: Whether Nature inclines more to loving GOD than to loving ourselves
Quaestio XXXII: Whether a man ought to love himself more than his neighbor
Quaestio XXXIII: Whether the eternal salvation of the neighbor is to be loved more than our own life
Quaestio XXXIV: Whether one neighbor is to be loved more than another
Quaestio XXXV: Whether a Son is to be loved more than a Father
Quaestio XXXVI: Whether a man ought out of CHARITY to love his Mother more than his Father
Quaestio XXXVII: Whether a man ought to love his spouse more than his parents, and Children
Quaestio XXXVIII: Whether the order of CHARITY is considered in the affection, and in the effect
Quaestio XXXIX: Whether the order of CHARITY remains in heaven
Quaestio XL: Whether it is more proper to Charity to love than to be loved
Quaestio XLI: Whether Love is the same as Benevolence
Quaestio XLII: Whether, and whether he can, GOD must be loved in the way with the whole heart, the whole soul, the whole mind, and all one's strength
Quaestio XLIII: Whether some measure is to be kept in Divine love
Quaestio XLIV: Whether Charity ought to be enlarged in heaven
Quaestio XLV: Whether it is more meritorious to love an enemy than a friend
Quaestio XLVI: Whether a man, constituted in however small CHARITY, is bound to undergo death for CHRIST
Quaestio XLVII: Whether those having perfect CHARITY are bound to fulfill the things that are of perfection
Quaestio XLVIII: How, and when, the precept of the love of GOD binds
Quaestio XLIX: Whether a man is bound at the first instant of the use of reason to be converted to GOD
Quaestio L: How, and when, the precept of the love of the neighbor binds
Disputatio IX: On the internal effects of Charity, JOY, PEACE, and MERCY
§ I: On Joy
Quaestio I: Whether JOY is an Effect of Charity, and of what kind
Quaestio II: Whether JOY is a virtue
§ II: On Peace
Quaestio I: UNICA. What PEACE is
§ III: On Mercy
Quaestio I: What MERCY is
Quaestio II: Which, and what kind of Virtue, MERCY is
Disputatio X: On the external effects of Charity
§ I: De Beneficentia
Quaestio I: UNICA. What BENEFICENCE is
§ II: On Almsgiving
Quaestio I: Whether to give ALMS is an act of Charity
Quaestio II: Whether the kinds of ALMS are fittingly distinguished
Quaestio III: Whether ALMS is a matter of precept
Quaestio IV: Whether it is a precept, in common necessities, to give superfluities to the poor
Quaestio V: Whether anyone is bound at some time to give alms from things necessary to his state, apart from the extreme necessity of the neighbor
Quaestio VI: Whether alms is owed out of justice to one in extreme need
Quaestio VII: Whether Alms ought to be given from justly possessed goods
§ III: On Fraternal Correction
Quaestio I: Whether FRATERNAL CORRECTION is a matter of precept
Quaestio II: Whether the order of fraternal correction, even in Religious Orders, is a matter of precept, so that the correction first be made in secret
Disputatio XI: On Hatred
Quaestio I: What the object of HATRED is, and what it is
Quaestio II: What, and what kind of sin, hatred is
Disputatio XII: On Sloth
Quaestio I: What ACEDIA is, and what its object is
Disputatio XIII: On Envy
Quaestio I: What ENVY is, and what its object is
Quaestio II: How perverse ENVY is
Disputatio XIV: On Discord, and Contention
Quaestio I: What DISCORD is, and what kind of sin
Quaestio II: What kind, and how great, a sin Contention is
Disputatio XV: On Schism
Quaestio I: What kind of sin SCHISM is
Quaestio II: How great a sin SCHISM is
Quaestio III: What punishments are owed to SCHISMATICS
Disputatio XVI: DE BELLO
Quaestio I: Whether any war can be just
Quaestio II: What conditions are required for a just war
Quaestio III: By whom BELLUM (war) may be waged
Disputatio XVII: On Quarreling, and Sedition
Quaestio I: What RIXA (quarreling) is, and what kind of sin
Quaestio II: What sedition is
Disputatio XVIII: On Scandal
Quaestio I: What, and of how many kinds, SCANDAL is
Quaestio II: Whether SCANDAL is a special sin
Quaestio III: What is to be done, and what omitted, to avoid scandal
Quaestio IV: Whether it is lawful to persuade one resolved upon a great evil into a lesser evil
Disputatio XIX: On the Gift of Wisdom
Quaestio I: What kind of gift WISDOM is
Quaestio II: What is the usefulness, and necessity, of this Gift
Quaestio III: By what means is the GIFT OF WISDOM obtained from God
Quaestio IV: On the illumination that Wisdom brings
Quaestio V: On the spiritual delights of Wisdom
Quaestio VI: How Folly is opposed to Wisdom
Quaestio VII: Whether the seventh Beatitude corresponds to the gift of Wisdom
Disputatio XX: On Prudence
Quaestio I: What PRUDENCE is
Quaestio II: Whether PRUDENCE is a virtue
Quaestio III: Which are the offices of PRUDENCE
Quaestio IV: Who are the participants in PRUDENCE
Quaestio V: How Prudence is acquired, and lost
Quaestio VI: On the parts of the Virtue of PRUDENCE
Quaestio VII: How certain rules of prudence, applicable to the Monastic and Political state, are drawn from the Angelic Hierarchy
§ I: On the Prudence that men bound by solemn vows claim for themselves from the first choir of Angels
§ II: On the Governance of the Prelates of the Church, from the Second Hierarchy of the First Choir, likened to the Dominations
§ III: On the Prudence of Judges, compared with the Virtues, from the second order of the second Hierarchy
§ IV: On the governance of Princes, and similar Powers
§ V: On the Prudence of individuals, from the lowest Hierarchy
Quaestio I: Whether there is one PRUDENCE for all the moral virtues
Disputatio XXI: On the Gift of Counsel
Quaestio I: What the gift of COUNSEL is, and what its office is
Quaestio II: How the GIFT OF COUNSEL orders the mind
Quaestio III: Whether the Gift of COUNSEL remains in heaven
Quaestio IV: Whether the fifth Beatitude corresponds to the Gift of Counsel
Disputatio XXII: On the Vices contrary to Prudence
Quaestio I: On PRECIPITATION
Quaestio II: On INCONSIDERATENESS
Quaestio III: On INCONSTANCY
Quaestio IV: On Negligence
Quaestio V: On the prudence of the flesh
Quaestio VI: On ASTUTENESS
Quaestio VII: On CRAFT (dolus)
Quaestio VIII: On FRAUD
Quaestio IX: On solicitude for temporal things
Quaestio X: On solicitude for the Future
Quaestio XI: On the precepts of PRUDENCE
Disputatio XXIII: On Justice
Quaestio I: Whether Ius (right) is the object of JUSTICE
Quaestio II: What JUSTICE is
Quaestio III: Whether JUSTICE is a special virtue
Quaestio IV: In what subject JUSTICE consists
Quaestio V: Whether JUSTICE is the most excellent of the moral Virtues
Quaestio VI: What kind of sin INJUSTICE is, and how it is committed
Quaestio VII: Whether Judgment is an act of JUSTICE
Quaestio VIII: By what means the public Judgment of a Judge is just
Quaestio IX: In what way private judgment about the neighbor is illicit
Quaestio X: Whether Distributive JUSTICE differs in species from Commutative
Disputatio XXIV: On Restitution
Quaestio I: What RESTITUTION is
Quaestio II: Whether RESTITUTION is necessary for salvation
Quaestio III: Who is bound to RESTORE
Dubitatio I: Whether he is a true cause of loss without whom the loss would still have followed
Dubitatio II: On the indirect causes of loss
Dubitatio III: Whether one who has promised three or four times to restore, and has not restored, is to be absolved before restitution
Quaestio IV: To whom RESTITUTION is to be made
Quaestio V: What ought to be restored
Dubitatio I: Whether the goods of fortune are to be restored in the same way
Dubitatio II: In what manner RESTITUTION is to be made for goods of the body
Dubitatio III: Whether, and how, RESTITUTION of Fame, and Honor, is to be made
Dubitatio IV: On the restitution of goods of the soul
Dubitatio V: When a thing acquired by contract is to be restored
Dubitatio VI: When things acquired by donation ought to be restored
Dubitatio VII: When things acquired by prescription are to be restored
Dubitatio VIII: When a thing acquired as wages for the function of an office is to be restored
Dubitatio IX: Whether the wages of harlotry are to be restored
Dubitatio X: When things acquired by fowling, fishing, and hunting are to be restored
Dubitatio XI: When things acquired by the use of common things are to be restored
Dubitatio XII: Whether things acquired in illicit games are to be restored
Dubitatio XIII: Which things are to be restored on account of finding
Dubitatio XIV: On the restitution of goods impeded by violence, fraud, or evil intention
Dubitatio XV: Whether anyone is bound to restore defrauded customs duties
Dubitatio XVI: What form is to be observed in a just tribute
Quaestio VI: How much is to be Restored
Quaestio VII: When restitution is to be made, and the causes excusing from it
Dubitatio I: Whether entrance into Religion excuses from Restitution
Dubitatio II: Whether cession of goods excuses from restitution
Dubitatio III: On the causes excusing from Restitution on the part of the creditor
Dubitatio IV: On the causes excusing from restitution on the part of the debtor
Dubitatio V: On the causes excusing from Restitution on the part of the public authority
Quaestio VIII: Where restitution is to be made
Quaestio IX: How restitution is to be made
Quaestio X: In what order restitution is to be made
Quaestio XI: What Acceptance of Persons is, and what kind of sin
Quaestio XII: Whether, and how, it is a sin of acceptance of persons to choose the unworthy, or less deserving, for benefices
Quaestio XIII: Whether Acceptance of persons has place in the showing of honor, and reverence
Quaestio XIV: Whether acceptance of persons finds a place in the sentences of Judges
Dubitatio I: Whether a JUDGE can, without the note of acceptance of persons, adhere to the Favor of friends, when the law is doubtful among the Doctors
Disputatio XXV: On Homicide
Quaestio I: What Homicide is, and of how many kinds
Quaestio II: On homicide from deliberately, insidiously, and treacherously intending it
Quaestio III: Whether one who commands is to be burdened with the same guilt, and punishment as the one who executes
Quaestio IV: Whether an attempt at homicide, and other crimes, is to be punished with the same penalty as the crime consummated
Quaestio V: What are the punishments of voluntary Homicide
Quaestio VI: Whether it is lawful to kill a man with the moderation of blameless defense, for the defense of himself or his goods
Dubitatio I: Whether it is lawful to kill someone to preserve honor, not by fleeing etc.
Dubitatio II: Whether one who is attacked is bound in some case to kill the aggressor
Dubitatio III: Whether it is lawful, in defense of one's own goods, to kill a thief
Dubitatio IV: Whether, in defense of Chastity, it is lawful to kill the Assailant
Quaestio VII: Whether, and how, MONOMACHIA (dueling) is illicit
Quaestio VIII: Whether it is lawful for a Husband to kill a Wife caught in adultery, and a father his daughter, and a brother his Sister, together with the seducer
Quaestio IX: Whether it is lawful to kill oneself
Dubitatio I: Whether it is lawful to shorten our life by mortifications
Dubitatio II: Whether, to avoid a sin or another evil, it is lawful to kill oneself
Dubitatio III: Whether, for the life of the neighbor, it is lawful to give oneself over to death
Dubitatio IV: When we are bound to die for the salvation of souls
Quaestio X: Whether a pregnant Mother may, to save her own life, procure the abortion of the fetus
Quaestio XI: On accidental Homicide
Quaestio XII: Whether a JUDGE can condemn an innocent man to death who has been proven guilty in the trial
Quaestio XIII: Whether Princes can grant license to kill outlaws
Quaestio XIV: On the Restitution owed on account of homicide, or mutilation
Quaestio XV: Whether the mutilation of a limb is ever lawful
Quaestio XVI: Whether it is lawful to imprison or beat another
Disputatio XXVI: On Theft, and Rapine
Quaestio I: What Dominion is
Quaestio II: Whether it is lawful to have private dominion over things
Quaestio III: What THEFT is
Quaestio IV: What quantity is required for mortal sin in Theft
Dubitatio I: What is the grave quantity of theft for Sons, Wives, and Religious
Quaestio V: Whether Theft is mortal when, from many tiny thefts, there supervenes a particle making the thing grave
Quaestio VI: Whether in extreme, or urgent, necessity it is lawful to take what belongs to another
Quaestio VII: On the Thefts of Religious
Quaestio VIII: Whether men can be reduced to slavery, and sold
Quaestio IX: Whether slaves can wrest themselves from their Masters
Quaestio X: Whether it is lawful, by private authority, to recover what is ours
Quaestio XI: On the punishment of Thieves
Quaestio XII: On the restitution of thefts
Disputatio XXVII: On the JUDGE
Quaestio I: Whether power is necessary in a JUDGE
Quaestio II: Whether a JUDGE ought to follow the truth, and therefore be wise
Quaestio III: Whether the acts of a JUDGE who has not a true but only a putative title are valid, such that not even he sins
Quaestio IV: Whether the POPE can subject himself to someone's judgment
Quaestio V: Whether goodness is necessary in a JUDGE
Quaestio VI: On the external purity of the hands of the Judge
Quaestio VII: Whether excommunicated JUDGES sin in judging, and judge invalidly
Quaestio VIII: On the order to be observed by a JUDGE
Dubitatio I: On the mode of proceeding by Denunciation
Dubitatio II: On the mode of proceeding by Accusation
Dubitatio III: On the mode of proceeding by Inquisition
Disputatio XXVIII: On the Accused
Quaestio I: On the bringing of the Accused to the Tribunal
Quaestio II: Whether the Accused is bound to confess a crime half-proven
Quaestio III: Whether an ACCUSED, infamed for one crime, can be interrogated also about others
Quaestio IV: Whether one convicted of a crime can be interrogated about hidden accomplices, of whom there is no infamy
Quaestio V: Whether an Accused, unjustly denying a true crime for which he was to be condemned to a pecuniary penalty, is bound to pay, and whether he is subject to restitution
Quaestio VI: Whether a Reus, unjustly denying the truth, is bound to retract before the end of the Trial, when he is to be condemned
Quaestio VII: Whether, if the Accused is interrogated again, he can give only a relative answer, saying: as I answered
Quaestio VIII: How the ACCUSED ought to conduct himself in the examination, when pressed by the Judge's iniquitous interrogations
Quaestio IX: Whether it is lawful for the ACCUSED to appeal to another Judge
Quaestio X: Whether, and how, the ACCUSED can defend himself
Quaestio XI: Whether the Accused can flee, and how, and when
Disputatio XXIX: ON WITNESSES
Quaestio I: Whether anyone is sometimes bound to bear witness
Quaestio II: Who can be WITNESSES in a trial
Quaestio III: On the Injustice of false Witnesses
Quaestio IV: What penalties are established for false Witnesses
Disputatio XXX: On the Advocate
Quaestio I: Who can, and ought, to exercise this office
Quaestio II: On the sins of a wicked Advocate
Quaestio III: Whether an ADVOCATE is bound on account of light fault
Quaestio IV: Whether an Advocate, engaged by the year, is worthy of his fee in that year in which he did nothing
Quaestio V: Whether an Advocate is bound to defend a Client gratis in grave necessity
Quaestio VI: Whether an Advocate can receive gifts
Disputatio XXXI: On the Notary and the Tabellion
Quaestio I: On the Justice, or Injustice, of the Notary and the Tabellion
Disputatio XXXII: On Contumely
Quaestio I: What Contumely is, and whence it arises
Quaestio II: How a Christian ought to conduct himself when assailed by contumelies
Disputatio XXXIII: On Detraction
Quaestio I: What Detraction is, and of how many kinds
Quaestio II: Whether detraction is a mortal sin
Quaestio III: Whether it is mortal to reveal a hidden crime to one, or two prudent men, who will keep silent about it
Quaestio IV: Whether material Detraction, which comes from talkativeness, is deadly
Quaestio V: Whether to be silent about a good that has been blackened is mortal
Quaestio VI: On the various cases in which detraction seems to be excused
Quaestio VII: Whether it is ever lawful to defame another with a falsehood, or to open his hidden crime
Quaestio VIII: Whether it is lawful to narrate a crime, notorious in one place, in another, where it is not known
Quaestio IX: Whether it is lawful to open someone's hidden crime to spare him torments
Quaestio X: Whether anyone can defame himself
Disputatio XXXIV: On Whispering, Mockery, and Cursing
Quaestio I: On the malice of Whispering
Quaestio II: On the malice of Mockery
Quaestio III: On Cursings
Tractatus II: E CONTRACTIBUS
Proemium I: Prooemium
Disputatio I: FIRST. On CONTRACTS in general
Quaestio I: What a CONTRACT is, and of how many kinds
Quaestio II: Whether for the validity of a Contract the intention of contracting, and of binding oneself, is required
Quaestio III: How Error, or fraud, vitiates a Contract
Quaestio IV: How fear voids a Contract
Quaestio V: On conditional Contracts
Quaestio VI: On the obligation that results from a valid Contract
Quaestio VII: Which persons can enter into a Contract, and which cannot
Quaestio VIII: Whether, and when, it is lawful to withdraw from a contract, the other party objecting
Disputatio II: On the acquisition of Dominion over Persons, and other things, through the Division of things Acquired
Quaestio I: By what right the first division, and subjection, of things was made
Quaestio II: On the acquisition of DOMINION over Barbarians
Quaestio III: On the acquisition of DOMINION over irrational creatures
Disputatio III: On Promise
Quaestio I: What a PROMISE is, and how it differs from a DONATION
Quaestio II: Whether a simple PROMISE, once accepted, binds in justice
Quaestio III: Whether a merely internal PROMISE, made to a man, binds
Quaestio IV: Whether an external Promise binds before it is accepted
Quaestio V: Whether a PROMISE binds when made for a base cause
Disputatio IV: ON DONATION
Quaestio I: What DONATION is, and of how many kinds
Quaestio II: Who can donate, and what
Quaestio III: On the revocations of donations
Disputatio V: On Buying, and Selling
Quaestio I: What EMPTIO (buying), and VENDITIO (selling), are
Quaestio II: Which persons can buy, and sell
Quaestio III: Which things can be sold
Quaestio IV: Of how many kinds is the price of things
Quaestio V: Whether, for certain causes, it is lawful to reduce below the minimum price, or raise above the maximum
Quaestio VI: Whether on account of ceasing profit, or emerging loss, the price can be raised above the maximum
Quaestio VII: Whether it is lawful to sell more dearly above the top price, awaiting payment, than with money paid down
Quaestio VIII: Whether Stocolia and Barocolia (Italian), Stocch (Spanish, MOHATRA) are lawful
Quaestio IX: To what extent Buying, and Selling, in Monopolies is illicit
Quaestio X: Whether the seller is bound to disclose a grave defect of the thing
Quaestio XI: Whether a thing sold, not yet delivered, perishes to the buyer
Quaestio XII: On the rescission of a sale, and purchase, on account of fraud etc.
Quaestio XIII: Whether a sale with a pact of buying back is lawful
Disputatio VI: On the loan and Usury
Quaestio I: What MUTUUM (loan) and USURY are, and why the latter is a sin
Quaestio II: Whether it is USURY to lend so that, when I have need, you lend back to me, or buy from me at a just price
Quaestio III: Whether it is lawful to lend with the pact that the one who receives the loan confer an office, or ecclesiastical benefice
Quaestio IV: Whether it is USURY to receive, beyond the principal, any other gain whatever besides the money
Quaestio V: Whether, and what, the lender can receive on account of danger, and ceasing profit
Quaestio VI: Whether it is lawful to lend wheat, or something else, with the pact that it be restored in the same measure, even if the price has risen at the time of restitution
Quaestio VII: Whether, and how, gain acquired from Usury is to be restored
Quaestio VIII: Whether it is lawful to seek a loan from a Usurer
Disputatio VII: ON CENSUSES (annuities)
Quaestio I: What a Census is, and of how many kinds
Quaestio II: Whether a Census can lawfully be sold
Quaestio III: From which things a CENSUS can be sold by natural law
Quaestio IV: Until what time a CENSUS can be sold
Quaestio V: What conditions are required for a CENSUS
Disputatio VIII: ON EXCHANGES
Quaestio I: What CAMBIUM (exchange) is, and of how many kinds
Quaestio II: Whether in petty exchange it is lawful to receive something above the value of the coin fixed by law
Quaestio III: Whether in local exchange, or by letters, when the first Campsor receives, so that he may restore elsewhere, he can gain something
Quaestio IV: Whether CAMBIUM is lawful, when for the Campsor a Procurator of the Campsor answers with the moneys of the Campsor himself
Quaestio V: Whether the said Recambia are lawful only on account of ceasing profit, or emerging loss
Quaestio VI: Whether the solutions, and provisions, that Money-changers receive are lawful
Disputatio IX: On the Contract of Partnership
Quaestio I: In what the CONTRACT OF PARTNERSHIP consists, and what is required that it be just
Quaestio II: Whether, and how, other contracts can be united with the Contract of Partnership
Quaestio III: Whether the contract by which, for secure capital, some certain gain is received annually is lawful
Disputatio X: On Emphyteusis, Letting, Hiring, and the Feud
Quaestio I: What EMPHYTEUSIS is
Quaestio II: What Locatio (letting) is
Quaestio III: What a FEUDUM (fief) is, and of how many kinds
Disputatio XI: On Testaments
Quaestio I: What a TESTAMENT is, and of how many kinds
Quaestio II: What solemnity is required for a Testament, closed and open
Quaestio III: Who can, and ought, to make testaments, or be instituted heirs
Quaestio IV: Whether an heir instituted in a testament invalid through defect of solemnity by civil law can pursue the inheritance in the forum of conscience, despoiling the heir succeeding ab intestato
Quaestio V: By what means a Testament is revocable
Quaestio VI: What obligation Heirs instituted by testament undertake
Disputatio XII: On Legacies
Quaestio I: What a Legacy is, and of how many kinds
Quaestio II: Whether legacies ought to be paid to all those for whom they are made, and how
Quaestio III: Which things can be bequeathed
Quaestio IV: What a Pious, or Privileged, Legacy is
Quaestio V: By what means legacies are caducous, such that the Heir is not bound to pay them
Tractatus III: E RELIGIONE
Proemium I: Prooemium
Disputatio I: FIRST. On RELIGION in general
Quaestio I: What the Virtue of RELIGION is
Quaestio II: Whether Religion is a Virtue
Quaestio III: Whether LATRIA, or RELIGION, is a special virtue
Quaestio IV: Whether RELIGION is a Cardinal Virtue
Quaestio V: How widely the acts of Religion extend
Quaestio VI: Whether RELIGION is necessary
Quaestio VII: Whether true RELIGION ought to be one
Disputatio II: ON DEVOTION
Quaestio I: What Devotion is, and of how many kinds
Disputatio III: ON PRAYER
Quaestio I: What Prayer is
Quaestio II: Of how many kinds is PRAYER
Quaestio III: Whether PRAYER is necessary
Quaestio IV: Whether Prayer is not only petitory, but also satisfactory, and meritorious
Quaestio V: What conditions are required for perfect Prayer
Quaestio VI: What is to be sought in Prayer: where the petitions of the Lord's Prayer are expounded
What is to be asked for in Prayer: where the petitions of the Lord's Prayer are expounded.
SINCE we do not know what we ought to ask for, as is said in Rom. 8, the Spirit himself asketh for us, that is, he teaches us to ask. And Christ Matth. 6 and Luke 11 taught that golden Prayer, in which are all the Treasures of Paradise, as I said above quaest. 3. Therefore in expounding it the chief Fathers have been diligent: Tertullian in his book on prayer, Cyprian on the Lord's Prayer, Cyril of Jerusalem Catech. 5, Chrysostom homilies on the Lord's Prayer, the Nyssene in five homilies, Ambrose l. 5 de Sacramentis, cap. 4, Augustine l. 2 de sermone Domini in monte, cap. 5, Cassian collat. 2 cap. 18 et seqq., Chrysologus serm. 67, and the Interpreters of Matthew cap. six.
MORE FULLY than the others our Seraphic Doctor chews, ruminates, and savors it, in 5. p. Breuil. cap. ult. 3. p. Centil. sect. 46 and on cap. 3 of the Rule, where it is imposed upon the Laity: and 3. p. Stimuli Diuini amoris, cap. 17 and on cap. 6 of the Gospel of S. Matthew. See also Suar. de orat. Fill. t. 2 cap. 2, Less. l. 2 cap. 37, Azor. p. 1 l. 9 cap. 34, Bict. quaest. 4.
HE EXPOUNDS certain petitions separately, as in 4 dist. 17 p. 2, the dubiis litt. in Pharetra, l. 2, chapter 45.
THE Holy Doctor prefaces that this prayer is most excellent of all on three counts. First, on account of its author Christ, who composed it. Second, on account of its brevity, so that it can be said more quickly and held more firmly. Third, on account of its fruitfulness, because in a few words it comprehends all things to be desired and asked for.
SINCE therefore this divine prayer contains all petitions, consequently it asks for all evils to be removed and all goods to be given, and this in seven petitions. He divides the evils into punishment and fault. Further, all of them into past, present, and future.
HE divides the evils of fault into the seven capital vices: pride, Avarice, Lust, Envy, Gluttony, and Sloth. Again, some evils are reducible both to punishment and to fault, such as temptations; for temptation as trial, or the very passion of temptation, is a punishment; but falling, and being led into temptation, is of fault. And for deliverance from all of these the golden prayer asks.
AGAIN, since there are seven principal virtues, three Theological and four Cardinal. There are also seven gifts of the Holy Spirit, by which we are strengthened in the virtues: namely the Gift of Wisdom; of Understanding, of Counsel, of Knowledge, of Piety, of Fortitude, and of the Fear of the Lord.
THERE are also seven Beatitudes: the Kingdom of heaven, the Possession of the land, Consolation; Satiety, the attainment of Mercy, the Vision of God, and the Adoption of God.
FIRST he opposes seven principal gifts to the seven vices, namely, poverty of spirit against pride: Meekness against Anger: Mourning of compassion against the venom of Envy: Thirst for Justice against Sloth: Mercy against Avarice: Cleanness of heart against Gluttony, and Peace against Lust; or with these last two exchanged, cleanness against the uncleanness of Lust, and Peace against insatiable Gluttony.
FURTHER, we can also oppose the seven principal virtues to the seven vices: Faith, by which the intellect is taken captive into obedience to Christ, is opposed to pride. Hope, by which every thought is cast upon the Lord, to Avarice: Charity to Envy: Prudence to headlong Anger: Justice, by which due obedience is rendered to God and right to one's neighbor, to Sloth: Fortitude to flaccid Lust, and Temperance to Gluttony: The Holy Doctor considers all these septenaries as comprehended in the seven petitions, as we shall say presently.
HE PREFACES, moreover, an exordium necessary for the narration: Pater noster. He placed first the name that is sweet and the name of confidence. It is not said Lord; but Father, because he allures us not as servants compelled by fear, but as children by love to the bosom of the Father; for this is the difference between the petition of a servant and of a son. Hence Malach. 1: If I be a Father, where is my honor? and if I be a Lord, where is the fear? For God is invoked as Father because he is the Father who begot the Son, namely like unto himself. God moreover created us in the beginning to his own image. Therefore from creation he obtains the title of Father. Deuter. 32: Is not he himself thy Father, who made, and created thee? Then through the adoption of grace he made us sons of God, Matth. 5: Be ye perfect, as also your heavenly Father is perfect.
FIRST, then, the eternal Father is the begetter of the Son by nature, as Christ himself says: Matth. 11, Ioan. 1 and the following. To display therefore that surpassing confidence which is indeed necessary for prayer, he teaches us to invoke him thus: Pater noster, Qui es in caelis. Hence confidence is increased, while we acknowledge the most loving Father, most powerful to do all things, inasmuch as he is King of heaven and on the throne of majesty commands all things; and: All things whatsoever he would, the same hath he done in heaven, and in earth, as the Holy Doctor expounds with S. Cyprian loc. cit., the Nyssene homil. 2 on this prayer, and others. He is said also to dwell in the spiritual heavens, that is, in the saints, as the Holy Doctor expounds here on cap. 6 of Matth. with S. Ambrose lib. 5 de sacr. cap. 4 and Augustine lib. 2 de serm. Domini in monte, cap. 9. Now the saints (says the Holy Doctor) are called heavens in a fourfold way. First, on account of the sublimity of their life, Paul saying, Philip. 3: Our conversation is in heaven. Second, on account of the clarity of their good works, Philip. 2: Among whom you shine as lights in the world, holding forth the word of life, and Matth. 4: Let your light shine before men, etc. Third, on account of their firmness in their purposes, Psalm. 32: By the word of the Lord the heavens were made firm. Fourth, on account of the seat of God resting in them through grace. Isa. 66: Heaven is my seat. We invoke therefore this heavenly Father also, that we may be mindful to ask of him first the things that are heavenly, according to that: Seek ye first the kingdom of God.
THE exordium being finished, there follows the exposition of the necessities and the asking for the gifts: the asking is made, moreover, that evils may be removed and goods granted. First he asks for the knowledge of the First True One: Second, for the attainment of the Arduous One: Third, for the attainment of the Good.
THE FIRST: Sanctificetur nomen tuum; For since the end is first in intention, therefore in these two first petitions are asked those things that touch upon the end; and afterwards in the following petitions the means to the end.
THEREFORE first we ask that the holy name of God and his majesty be sanctified, not in itself, since it is holiness itself, but in us, through the knowledge of the Divine majesty and the love of it, as the saints expound: Cyprian, Ambrose loco cit., the Nyssene oratione 3, Augustine lib. 2 de sermone Domini, cap. 10 and others.
THE NAME of God indeed is acclaimed holy and terrible, Psalm. 110: Holy and terrible is his name. and Deuter. 28: It is admirable, Psalm. 8: it is Praiseworthy. Psalm. 112. Now the name of God is terrible as regards the Power, which is attributed to the Father; admirable as regards the Wisdom, which is attributed to the Son; Praiseworthy as regards the Goodness, which is ascribed to the Holy Spirit. Let therefore the most holy Name of God be sanctified in us, that is, let the Terrible be confirmed in us in the knowledge of the supreme power; the Admirable in the knowledge of the first truth; and the Praiseworthy in the knowledge of the supreme Goodness. He says therefore: sanctificetur nomen tuum, as if to say: give us the Spirit of Faith and of wisdom, that we may know and taste how sweet thou art, and may this generate in us peace, and this against lust, because the Prophet says, Psalm. 37: There is no peace to my bones because of my sins.
THE SECOND petition: Adveniat regnum tuum. The kingdom of God is indeed called the Church militant, as is had in Matth. 13: They shall gather out of his kingdom all scandals. The Gospel also is so called: The kingdom of God is evangelized, Luke 16. The eternal beatitude is also called the Kingdom of God, Matth. 13: the just shall shine as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. The advent of the kingdom is therefore asked: Give us the spirit of understanding, whereby cleansed in heart we may understand in the present that thou reignest through Faith, and may we hope for that arduous good, until we see thee in the Kingdom by sight; in the meantime keeping watch, lest given over to Gluttony we be found drunk and unprepared, distracted by the cares of this age, because wine and drunkenness take away the heart. Osee 4.
THE THIRD petition: Fiat voluntas tua, now we begin to ask principally for the means to attaining the end, namely, the execution of the commandments, above all of Charity, which is the fullness of the law, as the Holy Doctor expounds with D. Augustine cap. 11. The will of God indeed shines forth in creation, Psalm. 103: All things whatsoever he would, the same hath he done. In sanctification, prima Thessal. 4: This is the will of God, your sanctification. In glorification, Ioan. 6: This is the will of my Father, that everyone who seeth the Son, and believeth in him, may have life everlasting. Therefore he asks: Give us the spirit of Counsel, that we may do thy will, above all in Charity toward thee and our neighbor, because he that loveth, hath fulfilled the law; whence mercy toward neighbors follows against avarice, that we may attain mercy, as is said Matth. 5: Blessed are the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy.
THE FOURTH petition is: Panem nostrum quotidianum da nobis hodie.
THE Holy Doctor distinguishes a threefold bread. The first is corporal, of which Genes. 3: In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat thy bread. The second is sacramental, prima Corinth. 11: Whosoever shall eat this bread, etc. There is also the eternal heavenly bread, Ioan. 6: I am the living bread, which came down from heaven, and this is especially called supersubstantialis. Therefore D. Hieron. ad Matth. 6 says supersubstantial bread is that which says: I am the living bread, which surpasses all creatures.
WE ASK therefore for these breads, as D. Augustine says cap. 12 in the quoted sermon: Daily bread, so called; either the necessaries of this life, or the Sacrament of the body of Christ, intending both.
ON these three breads the Holy Doctor takes that of Luke 11: Friend, lend me three loaves. The first bread is for the sustentation of the body: The second for the refreshment of the soul on the way: The third in the fatherland for eternal fruition. He says therefore: Panem nostrum supersubstantialem da nobis hodie; for thus it is to be read from the Hebrew, says Blessed Jerome; and thus the LXX are wont to translate the same name from the Hebrew, for the Hebrew Segula signifies supersubstantial. We ask therefore the nourishment necessary for the body, and all the aids of the soul, above all the most holy bread of the Eucharist, that the soul may be strengthened, and that we may afterwards obtain in the fatherland the bread of Angels.
HENCE we implore the gift of Fortitude, that it may give us strength together with the bread, which confirmeth the heart of man. We ask the hunger of justice, that we may attain the beatitude of Satiety, and in the meantime against sloth let us breathe after justice, because Blessed are they that hunger and thirst after justice: for they shall be filled.
THE FIFTH petition: Dimitte nobis debita nostra, sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris. The manner of a great petition: it declares that debts are to be forgiven us: Sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris. We ask here, moreover, for the medium per accidens of beatitude, that he may remit to us the debts of sins, that we may attain beatitude, as the Holy Doctor notes from D. Augustine lib. 2 de sermon. Domini in monte, chapter 1; and he proves this by that passage Matth. 18 where God is introduced in the parable as unwilling to forgive him who was unwilling to forgive others: Thou wicked servant, I forgave thee all the debt, because thou besoughtest me: shouldst not thou then have had compassion also on thy fellow servant, as I also had compassion on thee? And thus, says the Lord: For if you will forgive men their offenses, your heavenly Father will forgive also you their offenses; but if you will not forgive men, neither will your Father forgive you your offenses. Wherefore, as the same Saint Augustine says there: Then we are convicted of acting against this rule, if we do not forgive those who ask pardon; because we wish pardon to be granted to us also, who ask it, from the most benign Father. We ask therefore the gift of knowledge, that we may know how to give and build up what we owe, and let us learn to forgive, being moved even by compassion for others, not to mention our own sins, and thus may we have consolation from the indulgence granted to us, inasmuch as we also, against the venom of envy, have through charity toward our neighbor remitted it to him.
THE SIXTH petition is: Ne nos inducas in tentationem.
THE Holy Doctor observes, moreover, that there are many kinds of temptation. For there is the temptation of provocation, of which Exodi 17: And Moses called the name of that place Temptation, because of the altercation of the children of Israel, and because they tempted the Lord, saying: Is the Lord amongst us or not? There is the temptation of probation, of which Iacobi 1: Blessed is the man that endureth temptation. And Tob. 2: God permitted this temptation to befall him for this reason, that an example of his patience might be given to posterity, as also of the holy Job. There is also the temptation of evil persuasion, Matth. 4: The tempter coming said to him: If thou be the Son of God, command that these stones be made bread. And prima Corinth. 10: God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that which you are able. Of this third kind it is understood, that God suffer us not to rush into the temptation of sin, but we pray that he may stretch forth his hand and help, as the Holy Doctor expounds with D. Augustine cap. 14 loco citato, where he says: No one can be without the temptation of probation. Therefore it is not prayed for here that we be not tempted in any way; but that we be not brought into temptation. As if anyone who must be examined by fire should not pray not to be touched by fire, but not to be burnt up. For the furnace proveth the vessels of the potter, and the temptation of tribulation the just men, Ecclesiast. 27. Joseph was tempted by the enticement of lust, but was not brought into temptation. Susanna was tempted, but neither was she induced, or brought into temptation, and many others.
THEREFORE we ask for the spirit of piety and meekness of spirit, that by exercising ourselves in holy works, toward which all piety is profitable, we may flee idleness, the fuel of temptation, and with a meek spirit bear up until the coming of the salvation of the Lord, neither rendering to our neighbor evil for evil, as was said in the preceding petition, let us avoid headlong Anger, foreseeing with prudence and being watchful against perils, and so may we possess the land of the living, which is given to those who patiently endure temptations, as Tobias and Job are said to have possessed it, of whom it is said: Blessed are the meek: for they shall possess the land.
THE SEVENTH petition: Sed libera nos a malo, namely of fault, of which Rom. 6: Being delivered from sin, made servants to God. And from the evil of misery, of which Rom. 8: The creature also shall be delivered from the servitude of corruption, and above all from the evil of eternal punishment, Osee 13: I will deliver thee out of the hand of death.
HE ASKS therefore for the spirit of the fear of the Lord, whereby fleeing the more eagerly to God he may ask for deliverance from evils, and through the virtue of poverty of spirit let us humbly beseech God, as Blessed Cyprian says. For thus we ask, as D. Ambrose also expounds, to be delivered from the evil Demon, lest by pride he draw us down to ruin.
HE CONCLUDES these petitions saying: Amen, which signifies faithfully, as S. Hieronym. interprets Matth. 6, or truly, as, by the testimony of Jerome, Aquila interprets it, or so be it, as Ambrose explains in Psalm. 40 on the words: fiat, fiat, where the Hebrew has: AMEN.
WHERE the Holy Doctor notes besides that at the end of books the Hebrews are wont to put one of three: either Amen, which signifies truly and faithfully, or Salab, which signifies forever, or Salom, which signifies peace. Finally he adds that Amen is sometimes a name, as Apoc. 3: These things saith: Amen, the faithful and true witness, who is the beginning of the creation of God. Sometimes adverbially, as Amen, Amen I say to thee: this day thou shalt be with me in Paradise, Luke 23. Sometimes verbally, as here, that is: may all the things foretold be done for us by thy grace. Hence it comes about that one who only answers Amen, so be it to another praying becomes a partaker of his prayers, which is quite suitable in vocal prayer, that one only pray and another attend. These things the Holy Doctor, from which I also deduce that the same can be taken in two other ways, that the Lord himself JESUS be invoked here as Amen, inasmuch as he never fails those who pray, but may he himself conclude our prayer with a beneficent conclusion, according to his promises, because God is faithful. Therefore from fidelity God is rightly present to those praying; yet it does not follow that he is present from justice, because he grants the things asked not in equality with our prayer, or by just distribution, but by his mercy, as I gather from the Holy Doctor, and Valentia notes disp. 6 quaestion. 2 p. 4 contra Medinam quaestion. 18 de oratione. For thus Daniel chapter 9 cried out: Not in our justifications do we prostrate our prayers before thy face, but in thy many mercies hear, O Lord, etc.
HE observes also, with Valentia, point 5, from D. Bonavent. ad 11 Lucae, who recalled only five petitions, omitting the third and the seventh; because they are contained in the others, as D. Augustin. noted in Enchir. cap. 115 and 116; for the third, that is, fiat voluntas tua, is understood in that one: Sanctificetur nomen tuum, since it is necessary to do the will of God that his name be sanctified in us. Also the seventh: Sed libera nos a malo, is understood in that one: Ne nos inducas in tentationem. Whence D. Augustin. says shrewdly that Luke, by omitting petitions of this kind, rather made them to be understood.
THE Holy Doctor observes also that Luke ends with that petition: Ne nos inducas in tentationem, in which there is doubt as to our state or fall, and therefore he does not add Amen, which is the sign of the certainty of a prayer heard: but Matthew ends in the deliverance from every evil of punishment, and thereby from death, of which prima Corinth. 15: Last of all death shall be destroyed as an enemy, and afterwards there is the certainty of salvation, therefore he ends saying: Amen, to give certainty for that time; but because, as long as we are here, we do not arrive at this certainty, therefore it is said in a low voice by the Priest in Mass. Thus the Holy Doctor ad 6 Matthaei.
HE EXPOUNDS this most sacred prayer in an altogether not dissimilar manner, according to the Gospel of Luke: When you pray, say, with heart and mouth, lest that word of Mark 7 be ever said of us: This people honoreth me with their lips; but their heart is far from me. With the heart indeed, but also with the mouth, according to that Psalm. 108: I will greatly praise the Lord with my mouth. He is invoked moreover as Father by reason of the condition of nature, according to that, Ephes. 3: Of whom all paternity. And Malach. 2: Have we not all one father? He is also Father by reason of the bestowal of grace, Rom. 8: You have received the spirit of adoption of sons, wherein we cry: Abba, Father. The same is had Galat. 4; he is also Father by reason of the consummation of glory, Hierem. 3: Thou shalt call me Father, and shalt not cease to walk after me. Since therefore he is Father in all these ways, he shows that we ought confidently to ask all things of him. Luke however takes these implicitly, as said to the lesser disciples; yet each prefaces the name of Father, that the prayer may fly to God on reverence and confidence as on two wings. Reverence indeed is had from the name of Father, whence Malach. 1: If then I be a Father, where is my honor? And Eccles. 3: The glory of man is from the honor of his father. And confidence is had, according to that Isa. 49: Can a woman forget her infant, so as not to have pity on the fruit of her womb? Therefore Christ here infers: If you then, being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father give the good Spirit to them that ask him?
THEREFORE Beda on this passage: The prayer, which grows sweet with the paternal name, gives me confidence for the obtaining of all my petitions
PRESENTLY he begins to expound the petitions: For three things are to be asked of God the Father. The first is the end, which is the consummation of glory. The second the consummation of grace, which is the nearest medium. The third more remote, namely the forgiveness of pardon. And these three are ordered according to the degree and order of greater dignity. To the consummation of glory concur perfect knowledge and perfect reverence, and according to these are the two first petitions. For the consummation of grace there suffices the assiduous succor of heavenly nourishment, and this is asked third. For the forgiveness of pardon two things concur, namely the remission of fault and the removal of punishment, and these are asked in the two last petitions.
BUT since the perfection of reverence is attended to not only in affection but also in effect, therefore Matthew adds: Fiat voluntas tua. Again, because the removal of punishment is attended to not only as regards the removal of temptations but also of afflictions, therefore Matthew joins the seventh to the two last: Sed libera nos a malo.
THUS therefore he asks all things that are necessary, the removal of evil and the bestowal of good: Again, the removal of the evil of fault, and of punishment, or of the evil that we suffer and the evil that we do: but the evil of punishment can be subdivided; because one kind is the occasion of fault, and thus is temptation; another holds the ratio of mere punishment, and is tribulation; and thus from that division we have the three last petitions. We ask moreover for good, either eternal or temporal. If eternal, either on the part of the intellect or on the part of affection, and thus there are two petitions. But affection is ordered with respect to majesty and with respect to goodness, and thus that petition is doubled in the first division, but tripled by subdivision. If indeed temporal good is asked, it is asked either with reason of the mind or with reason of the body; but because corporal good ought not to be desired except on account of the spiritual, therefore both according to Luke and according to Matthew one petition is made for both, and thus the sufficiency of the divisions of either Evangelist is plain.
THERE are therefore five petitions according to Luke (says the Holy Doctor) ordered according to greater nobility: In the first is asked perfect knowledge of God: In the second perfect reverence in affection: In the third sufficiency in virtue: In the fourth indulgence in guilt: In the fifth victory in conflict; and in these are implicated the seven brought forward from Matthew. Sanctificetur nomen tuum. Here is asked knowledge of God, whence his name be sanctified, that is, honored as known by us, of which Psalm. 75: In Judea God is known and Malach. 1: For from the rising of the sun even to the going down, my name is great among the Gentiles. And Hierem. 31: All shall know me from the least to the greatest.
A THREEFOLD knowledge, moreover, is asked. The first through faith: For he that cometh to God must believe. Hebr. 11. The second, to know what God is not, of which Augustin: Thou wilt comprehend much, if thou comprehendest what God is not. The third is to know him as he is, of which prima Corinth. 13. The first knowledge delivers from folly; for Psalm. 13: The fool hath said in his heart, there is no God. The second delivers from Idolatry, by which that which is not God is worshiped, 1. Corinth. 8: An idol is nothing. The third delivers from all misery, because then we shall be like to him, because we shall see him as he is, 1. Ioan. 3.
HENCE D. Chrysost. in the imperfect work, on cap. 6 Matth: The name of God is sanctified in us when we shall know him holy, fear him, and vigilantly and carefully guard, lest perhaps we violate the sanctity of his name in us. And this will be when we shall be wholly devoted to him, and by no distraction shall our minds be infected, which will be in glory, according to that Psalm. 137: I will sing to thee in the sight of the angels; I will worship towards thy holy temple, and I will give glory to thy name. For thy mercy, and for thy truth; for thou hast magnified above all things thy holy name.
THE SECOND: Adveniat regnum tuum: But then he reigns perfectly in us, when we are altogether perfectly subject to him, which will be at the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, and the Father, prima Corinth. 15, Apoc. Thou hast redeemed us, etc. and hast made us to our God a kingdom. By the advent of this kingdom no power is added to God, but obedience to men, which makes the will of God be done, as Matthew says in the third petition, in heaven, and in earth. For here obedience is not so perfect as in heaven: Therefore he said Ioan. 18: My kingdom is not of this world; and this, because in the world there are the rulers of darkness Ephes. 6; but at the end of the world power shall be taken from the demons, and all shall be rendered to Christ, as is said Daniel. 7.
THE THIRD asks for the daily bread, where the spiritual bread is asked principally. Therefore Matthew says: Panem nostrum supersubstantialem da nobis hodie. But since nevertheless we ask for everything necessary even for this life, therefore the Church with Luke says: Panem quotidianum. The Holy Doctor observes, moreover, that daily bread is asked for on account of continual necessity, but that hodie is asked, that avaricious solicitude, thinking of the morrow, may be removed.
HE NOTES moreover that the Hebrew name Socholla, according to D. Hieron. in 6 Matth., signifies both daily and supersubstantial: but the Hebrew name is Segula.
AND this Beda says ad 11 Lucae in the Gloss: Moreover daily bread is so called because it is necessary here; of whatever kind is to be granted to soul and flesh, whether it be understood spiritually, or corporally, or in both ways.
A MANIFOLD bread therefore is asked here. The first is the nourishment of this life, Eccles. 29. The beginning of the life of man is water, and bread, and clothing. The second is the understanding of Sacred Scripture, of which in Thren: The little ones asked for bread. The third is the Sacrament of the Eucharist, of which Sap. 16. I gave them bread prepared from heaven without labor, having in itself all delight, and the sweetness of every savor. And Ioan. 6: The bread that I will give is my flesh for the life of the world. The fourth is the aid of Scripture, of which Psal. 77. Man ate the bread of Angels. And Psalm. 103. Bread confirmeth the heart of man. And Luke 14. Blessed is he that shall eat bread in the Kingdom of God. The fifth is the service of obedience; of which Ioan. 4: My meat is to do the will of my Father. With these five breads the Church is satiated, expressed in that multitude Ioan. 6. Therefore we must pray: Lord, give us always this bread.
THE FOURTH petition is: Dimitte nobis peccata nostra. For these make us debtors, of which Psalm. 36: The sinner shall borrow, and not pay. These are the debts which that woman could not pay until Eliseus multiplied the oil 4. Reg. 4. For the oil is the mercy of Christ; but because: Judgment without mercy to him that hath not done mercy, Iacobi 2. Therefore it is said: Siquidem et dimittimus omni debenti nobis. Whence Eccles. 28: Forgive thy neighbor that hath hurt thee: and then thy sins shall be forgiven when thou prayest. And Matth. 6: If you will forgive men their offenses; your heavenly Father will forgive you also yours. And Matth. 18, after recounting the punishment of him who was unwilling to forgive, it concludes: So shall my heavenly Father do to you, if you shall not forgive, etc. For it says, Iudith. 9. The proud have not pleased thee from the beginning: but the prayer of the humble and meek hath always pleased thee. And Isa. 1. When you shall multiply prayers, I will not hear: for your hands are full of blood.
FIFTH Luke adds the last: Et ne nos inducas in tentationem. He does not ask not to be tempted, because temptation proveth man, Psalm. 25. Prove me, O Lord, and try me. And Eccles. 35: He that is not tempted, what knoweth he? But he asks not to be overcome by temptation: God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that which you are able, prima Corinth. 10. This is also to be asked for on account of the recognition of our infirmity, according to that 2. Paral. 20. In us indeed there is not so great strength, that we may be able to resist this multitude, which rusheth upon us. But as we know not what we ought to do, this only we have remaining, that we direct our eyes to thee. Since therefore tribulation is temptation, according to that Iacobi 1: Blessed is the man that endureth temptation, therefore he who is snatched from all the evil of temptation is snatched from all the evil of tribulation; and therefore Luke does not add: Sed libera nos a malo, as a distinct petition, but expounds it, as included in this one. Therefore Beda says in the Gloss: Let each one know that he is delivered from evil in this, that he is not brought into temptation. But the reason why he does not add: Amen, I have said above.
FROM the exposition of the fourth petition you have that spiritual goods concerning salvation, together with the last end, can be asked determinately per se absolutely; but truly temporal and necessary goods, as bread and wine, are asked entirely in order to salvation. For this reason he puts one petition out of all for the spiritual and corporal bread. For thus it is licit to wish for these temporal goods, and not otherwise; and that only may be asked in praying which is licit to wish for, as D. Aug. says epist. 121.
PRAYER therefore that is absolute ought to be for three things to be obtained, pardon, grace with the virtues, and glory, as the Holy Doctor says ad 22 Lucae; therefore Christ prayed three times, and visiting the Apostles stirred them to prayer.