Palladium theologicum, Tomus quintus: De virtutibus

Gaudenzio da Brescia

Palladium theologicum, Tomus quintus: De virtutibus

Gaudenzio da Brescia (1612–1672)

Reuerendi patris Gaudentij Bontempi, ... Palladium theologicum, seu Tota theologia scholastica in septem tomos distributa. Ad intimam mentem d. Bonauenturae seraphici doctoris ... Tomus quintus, De virtutibus

First published 1676

Bontempi's Palladium theologicum (Lyon 1676) is a complete scholastic theology composed ad mentem D. Bonaventurae, arranged in seven tractatus on the order of the Secunda secundae. This fifth volume, De virtutibus, treats the theological virtues (faith, hope, charity, with their gifts, beatitudes and fruits), the cardinal virtues and their opposite vices, and the states and offices of men (religious and prelates, bishops, princes), including the extensive disputations on contracts, religion, vows, fortitude, temperance and the judicial process. It is a significant example of the Bonaventurian scholastic school and a counterpart to the Thomist manuals of the period.


Tractatus I: PRIMUS DE VIRTUTIBUS THEOLOGICIS

Proemium I: Prooemium

Disputatio I: ON FAITH

Quaestio I: What FAITH signifies, and what it is

Quaestio II: What the object of FAITH is

Quaestio III: Whether the object of FAITH is something complex

Quaestio IV: Whether the object of FAITH can be false

Quaestio V: Whether the object of FAITH can be evident scientifically

Quaestio VI: Whether FAITH is concerned with those things which are seen by vision on the way

Quaestio VII: Whether the articles of FAITH are evidently credible

Quaestio VIII: Whether the things to be believed are rightly arranged according to the articles

Quaestio IX: Whether the articles of FAITH have grown over the course of time

Quaestio X: Whether FAITH has grown as regards light

Quaestio XI: Whether Faith has grown in certitude

Quaestio XII: Whether the articles of Faith are to be expounded by some authority which is an infallible teacher, and what it is

Quaestio XIII: What are the marks of the true Church, in which the authority of expounding FAITH resides

Quaestio XIV: What must be believed by the necessity of means

Quaestio XV: What things are to be believed by the necessity of precept

Quaestio XVI: Whether we are bound to confess FAITH, and when

Quaestio XVII: Whether it is lawful to dispute about FAITH, and when

Quaestio XVIII: Whether Faith resides in the Intellect

Quaestio XIX: Whether Faith is perfected by Charity, as by its form

Quaestio XX: Whether it is certain that FAITH remains without CHARITY

Quaestio XXI: Whether, and how, FAITH is a VIRTUE

Quaestio XXII: Whether FAITH is ONE VIRTUE

Quaestio XXIII: Whether FAITH is the first of the Virtues

Quaestio XXIV: Whether FAITH is more certain than any science, or than any intellectual habit

Quaestio XXV: Whether one can know with certainty that he has FAITH

Quaestio XXVI: In whom FAITH is found

Quaestio XXVII: Whether FAITH is a substantial Gift of GOD

Quaestio XXVIII: Whether the difference between FAITH and other acts, natural as opposed to supernatural moral acts, always arises from the object

Quaestio XXIX: On the effects of FAITH

Quaestio XXX: On the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING

Dubitatio I: Whether UNDERSTANDING is a gift of the Holy Ghost

Dubitatio II: Whether the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING can coexist with FAITH

Dubitatio III: Whether the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING consists in the contemplation of the Creator and of Creation

Dubitatio IV: Whether the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING is found in all who have grace, and whether in these alone

Dubitatio V: What is the necessity and utility of the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING

Dubitatio VI: Whether* **the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING** *corresponds to the sixth beatitude, namely, Blessed are the clean of heart, etc.

Dubitatio VII: Whether* **to the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING** *there corresponds, among the fruits of the Holy Ghost, Faith

Quaestio XXXI: On the Gift of Knowledge

Dubitatio I: Whether* **KNOWLEDGE** *is a gift of the Holy Ghost

Dubitatio II: Whether knowledge is concerned with Divine things

Dubitatio III: Whether the gift of knowledge is speculative

Dubitatio IV: Whether the third Beatitude corresponds to the Gift of Knowledge: Blessed are they that mourn, etc.

Disputatio II: On Unbelief

Quaestio I: What UNBELIEF is, and what kind of sin it is

Quaestio II: Whether all the works of unbelievers are sins

Quaestio III: Whether unbelievers can be compelled to hear FAITH

Quaestio IV: Whether unbelievers can be compelled to embrace our FAITH, when it has been sufficiently set forth

Quaestio V: Whether unbaptized unbelievers can be compelled to abandon errors or rites contrary to natural reason

Quaestio VI: Whether the rites of unbelievers are to be permitted

Quaestio VII: Whether it is lawful to make agreements with unbelievers about the toleration of their rites

Quaestio VIII: Whether unbaptized unbelievers can retain power over the Faithful, and whether they can be deprived of it

Disputatio III: On Heresy

Quaestio I: What HERESY is

Quaestio II: Whether one who doubts about the articles of FAITH is a heretic

Quaestio III: Whether one who gives merely opinionative assent to an article of FAITH is a heretic

Quaestio IV: Whether, and what, Ignorance excuses from Heresy

Quaestio V: What pertinacity is required for HERESY

Quaestio VI: Whether, for one to be deemed a Heretic, it is necessary that he have been baptized and a believer

Quaestio VII: Whether the Church can compel heretics to receive the Catholic FAITH

Quaestio VIII: On the other means the Church uses against heretics, by forbidding their Books

Quaestio IX: Whether we are bound to avoid the conversation of heretics

Quaestio X: What excommunication is inflicted upon heretics

Quaestio XI: On the other spiritual punishments of heretics

Quaestio XII: On the temporal punishments of Heretics

Disputatio IV: On Hope

Quaestio I: What HOPE is

Quaestio II: What the material object of HOPE is

Question III

Quaestio IV: Whether a certain object is set forth for HOPE, and is hoped for

Quaestio V: Whether Hope is a Virtue

Quaestio VI: Whether HOPE is a Theological Virtue

Quaestio VII: Whether HOPE is at times formless

Quaestio VIII: Whether HOPE arises from merits

Quaestio IX: Whether Hope precedes Charity

Quaestio X: What the proximate subject of HOPE is

Quaestio XI: Whether HOPE remains in the Blessed

Quaestio XII: Whether there is a precept of hoping in GOD

Dubitatio I: UNICA. Would this precept bind one to whom certain damnation had been revealed

Disputatio V: On the Gift of Fear

Quaestio I: Whether FEAR is a Habit distinct from HOPE

Quaestio II: What the object of FEAR is

Quaestio III: Whether worldly Fear is always evil

Quaestio IV: Whether servile Fear is honorable, and a Gift of God

Quaestio V: Whether servile Fear is cast out when grace comes

Quaestio VI: Whether Initial and Filial Fear differ specifically

Quaestio VII: Whether, as Charity grows, Fear diminishes

Quaestio VIII: Whether gratuitous Fear remains in the fatherland

Quaestio IX: Whether Poverty of Spirit corresponds to the GIFT OF FEAR

Quaestio X: On the Effects, and the precept, of the FEAR OF GOD

Disputatio VI: On Despair

Quaestio I: UNICA. Of what power DESPAIR is an act, and what sin it is

Disputatio VII: On Presumption

Quaestio I: What PRESUMPTION is, and what kind of sin

Disputatio VIII: On Charity

Quaestio I: What CHARITY is

Quaestio II: What the object of Charity is

Quaestio III: Whether Charity is properly the friendship of God

Quaestio IV: Whether Charity is a created Habit

Quaestio V: Whether Charity is one special Virtue

Quaestio VI: Whether Charity is of a most special species

Quaestio VII: Whether Charity is the most excellent of the virtues

Quaestio VIII: Whether Charity is the Form of the Virtues

Quaestio IX: Whether besides infused Charity there is another charity, acquired by our own acts

Quaestio X: Whether Charity can be formless

Quaestio XI: Whether CHARITY increases, and how

Quaestio XII: Whether, and how, CHARITY in this life is perfect

Quaestio XIII: Whether Charity can be lost, and how

Quaestio XIV: What is the proximate subject of Charity

Quaestio XV: Whether God alone is to be loved out of Charity, or the neighbor also

Quaestio XVI: Whether Charity is to be loved out of Charity

Quaestio XVII: Whether all gratuitous gifts are to be loved out of CHARITY

Quaestio XVIII: Whether irrational creatures are to be loved out of CHARITY

Quaestio XIX: Whether a man ought to love himself out of CHARITY

Quaestio XX: Whether a man ought to love his own body out of Charity

Quaestio XXI: Whether sinners are to be loved out of Charity

Quaestio XXII: Whether it is necessary to love enemies out of CHARITY

Quaestio XXIII: Whether we are bound to show the effects of CHARITY toward enemies, and which

Quaestio XXIV: Whether Angels are to be loved out of CHARITY

Quaestio XXV: Whether Demons, and the Damned, are to be loved out of CHARITY

Quaestio XXVI: Whether it is fitting that four things to be loved out of CHARITY are enumerated

Quaestio XXVII: Whether God, and the neighbor, are loved with the same habit of CHARITY

Quaestio XXVIII: Whether there is order in CHARITY

Quaestio XXIX: Whether GOD is to be loved more than the neighbor

Quaestio XXX: Whether a man ought out of CHARITY to love God more than himself

Quaestio XXXI: Whether Nature inclines more to loving GOD than to loving ourselves

Quaestio XXXII: Whether a man ought to love himself more than his neighbor

Quaestio XXXIII: Whether the eternal salvation of the neighbor is to be loved more than our own life

Quaestio XXXIV: Whether one neighbor is to be loved more than another

Quaestio XXXV: Whether a Son is to be loved more than a Father

Quaestio XXXVI: Whether a man ought out of CHARITY to love his Mother more than his Father

Quaestio XXXVII: Whether a man ought to love his spouse more than his parents, and Children

Quaestio XXXVIII: Whether the order of CHARITY is considered in the affection, and in the effect

Quaestio XXXIX: Whether the order of CHARITY remains in heaven

Quaestio XL: Whether it is more proper to Charity to love than to be loved

Quaestio XLI: Whether Love is the same as Benevolence

Quaestio XLII: Whether, and whether he can, GOD must be loved in the way with the whole heart, the whole soul, the whole mind, and all one's strength

Quaestio XLIII: Whether some measure is to be kept in Divine love

Quaestio XLIV: Whether Charity ought to be enlarged in heaven

Quaestio XLV: Whether it is more meritorious to love an enemy than a friend

Quaestio XLVI: Whether a man, constituted in however small CHARITY, is bound to undergo death for CHRIST

Quaestio XLVII: Whether those having perfect CHARITY are bound to fulfill the things that are of perfection

Quaestio XLVIII: How, and when, the precept of the love of GOD binds

Quaestio XLIX: Whether a man is bound at the first instant of the use of reason to be converted to GOD

Quaestio L: How, and when, the precept of the love of the neighbor binds

Disputatio IX: On the internal effects of Charity, JOY, PEACE, and MERCY

§ I: On Joy

Quaestio I: Whether JOY is an Effect of Charity, and of what kind

Quaestio II: Whether JOY is a virtue

§ II: On Peace

Quaestio I: UNICA. What PEACE is

§ III: On Mercy

Quaestio I: What MERCY is

Quaestio II: Which, and what kind of Virtue, MERCY is

Disputatio X: On the external effects of Charity

§ I: De Beneficentia

Quaestio I: UNICA. What BENEFICENCE is

§ II: On Almsgiving

Quaestio I: Whether to give ALMS is an act of Charity

Quaestio II: Whether the kinds of ALMS are fittingly distinguished

Quaestio III: Whether ALMS is a matter of precept

Quaestio IV: Whether it is a precept, in common necessities, to give superfluities to the poor

Quaestio V: Whether anyone is bound at some time to give alms from things necessary to his state, apart from the extreme necessity of the neighbor

Quaestio VI: Whether alms is owed out of justice to one in extreme need

Quaestio VII: Whether Alms ought to be given from justly possessed goods

§ III: On Fraternal Correction

Quaestio I: Whether FRATERNAL CORRECTION is a matter of precept

Quaestio II: Whether the order of fraternal correction, even in Religious Orders, is a matter of precept, so that the correction first be made in secret

Disputatio XI: On Hatred

Quaestio I: What the object of HATRED is, and what it is

Quaestio II: What, and what kind of sin, hatred is

Disputatio XII: On Sloth

Quaestio I: What ACEDIA is, and what its object is

Disputatio XIII: On Envy

Quaestio I: What ENVY is, and what its object is

Quaestio II: How perverse ENVY is

Disputatio XIV: On Discord, and Contention

Quaestio I: What DISCORD is, and what kind of sin

Quaestio II: What kind, and how great, a sin Contention is

Disputatio XV: On Schism

Quaestio I: What kind of sin SCHISM is

Quaestio II: How great a sin SCHISM is

Quaestio III: What punishments are owed to SCHISMATICS

Disputatio XVI: DE BELLO

Quaestio I: Whether any war can be just

Quaestio II: What conditions are required for a just war

Quaestio III: By whom BELLUM (war) may be waged

Disputatio XVII: On Quarreling, and Sedition

Quaestio I: What RIXA (quarreling) is, and what kind of sin

Quaestio II: What sedition is

Disputatio XVIII: On Scandal

Quaestio I: What, and of how many kinds, SCANDAL is

Quaestio II: Whether SCANDAL is a special sin

Quaestio III: What is to be done, and what omitted, to avoid scandal

Quaestio IV: Whether it is lawful to persuade one resolved upon a great evil into a lesser evil

Disputatio XIX: On the Gift of Wisdom

Quaestio I: What kind of gift WISDOM is

Quaestio II: What is the usefulness, and necessity, of this Gift

Quaestio III: By what means is the GIFT OF WISDOM obtained from God

Quaestio IV: On the illumination that Wisdom brings

Quaestio V: On the spiritual delights of Wisdom

Quaestio VI: How Folly is opposed to Wisdom

Quaestio VII: Whether the seventh Beatitude corresponds to the gift of Wisdom

Disputatio XX: On Prudence

Quaestio I: What PRUDENCE is

Quaestio II: Whether PRUDENCE is a virtue

Quaestio III: Which are the offices of PRUDENCE

Quaestio IV: Who are the participants in PRUDENCE

Quaestio V: How Prudence is acquired, and lost

Quaestio VI: On the parts of the Virtue of PRUDENCE

Quaestio VII: How certain rules of prudence, applicable to the Monastic and Political state, are drawn from the Angelic Hierarchy

§ I: On the Prudence that men bound by solemn vows claim for themselves from the first choir of Angels

§ II: On the Governance of the Prelates of the Church, from the Second Hierarchy of the First Choir, likened to the Dominations

§ III: On the Prudence of Judges, compared with the Virtues, from the second order of the second Hierarchy

§ IV: On the governance of Princes, and similar Powers

§ V: On the Prudence of individuals, from the lowest Hierarchy

Quaestio I: Whether there is one PRUDENCE for all the moral virtues

Disputatio XXI: On the Gift of Counsel

Quaestio I: What the gift of COUNSEL is, and what its office is

Quaestio II: How the GIFT OF COUNSEL orders the mind

Quaestio III: Whether the Gift of COUNSEL remains in heaven

Quaestio IV: Whether the fifth Beatitude corresponds to the Gift of Counsel

Disputatio XXII: On the Vices contrary to Prudence

Quaestio I: On PRECIPITATION

Quaestio II: On INCONSIDERATENESS

Quaestio III: On INCONSTANCY

Quaestio IV: On Negligence

Quaestio V: On the prudence of the flesh

Quaestio VI: On ASTUTENESS

Quaestio VII: On CRAFT (dolus)

Quaestio VIII: On FRAUD

Quaestio IX: On solicitude for temporal things

Quaestio X: On solicitude for the Future

Quaestio XI: On the precepts of PRUDENCE

Disputatio XXIII: On Justice

Quaestio I: Whether Ius (right) is the object of JUSTICE

Quaestio II: What JUSTICE is

Quaestio III: Whether JUSTICE is a special virtue

Quaestio IV: In what subject JUSTICE consists

Quaestio V: Whether JUSTICE is the most excellent of the moral Virtues

Quaestio VI: What kind of sin INJUSTICE is, and how it is committed

Quaestio VII: Whether Judgment is an act of JUSTICE

Quaestio VIII: By what means the public Judgment of a Judge is just

By what reason the public Judgment of the Judge is just.

IN this matter it is certain, first, that among Christians there can be just Judgments, against the error of the Waldensians and the Anabaptists, as Tannerus warns, disp. 4. quaest. 4. dub. 1.

IT IS PROVED

IT IS PROVED at length by the Saintly Doctor, p. 2. de Eccles. Hier. cap. 2., where the Saintly Doctor shows that Judges and Princes ought to be like the supernal Virtues, so that they may judge rightly. He brings forward several Scriptures on this point, 1. Reg. 14., where of King David it is said: But you, my lord the King, are as an Angel of God, who is moved neither by blessing nor by cursing. From this he deduces that the Judge must be strong, in order to judge rightly. Therefore Eccles. 7. Do not seek to be made a Judge, unless you have the strength to break through iniquities, lest perhaps you fear the face of the mighty. Sap. 6. Hear, O Kings and Judges, who judge the earth: to you is Power given by the Most High. The same is found in Psalm. 2. in the New Testament: Be instructed, you who judge the earth. Therefore in Exodus 32. rules for judging are given to the faithful: You shall not accept gifts, etc., and Deuter. 16. You shall not respect persons nor accept gifts, for they blind, etc. Second Paral. 19. See what you do: for you do not exercise the judgment of men, but of God. Isa. 1. Judge for the orphan, help the oppressed.

THUS David judged, 1. Reg. 30.: David rescued all that the Amalekites had taken, nor was anything missing from the spoils: but all things whatsoever they had seized, he brought back and restored. And 2. Reg. 22. Whom he shall repay fourfold, where he is called by the holy prophet to judge. And Solomon, 3. Reg. 3., judged — while he was holy — over those two little harlots concerning the stolen child. Many other passages from the Scriptures the Saintly Doctor brings forward in the Biblia pauperum, cap. 50. also for the law of grace.

THESE he also pursues at length ad cap. 6. Sap., in these words: Power has been given to you by the Lord, and strength by the Most High, who will question your works; for, though you were ministers of his kingdom, you did not judge rightly, nor keep the law of justice. Where he adduces that Rom. 13. There is no power but from God; Ioan. 19. You would have no power against me unless it had been given you from above. That Isa. 1. They do not judge for the orphan, and the cause of the widow does not come to them. The same he laments, Hierem. 5.

THE SAME authorities the Saintly Doctor pursues at length on that Ioan. 19. You would have no power, etc., where in the New Testament the power of judging is asserted by Christ, and by the Apostle, Rom. 13., and by St. Peter.

THE SAME he pursues in serm. 22. Hexaëmer., where he observes that it was promised in Isaiah, chapter 1: I will restore your judges as they were at the first: after this you shall be called the city of the just, the faithful city of Sion; she shall be redeemed in judgment, etc. Whence it follows that judgments erected in the Old Testament were not destroyed in the New, as regards power.

THEREFORE Paul also appealed to Caesar, Act. 25. and 26., and therefore, together with Peter, he exhorted the faithful to submit to the judgment of Princes, Rom. 13. Let every soul be subject to the higher powers, etc. For he does not carry the sword without cause: for he is God's minister: an avenger into wrath upon him who does evil, as the Saintly Doctor shows in 2. dist. 44. art. 3. quaest. 1., and in the first Epistle of Peter, 2. Servants, be subject to your masters, not only to the good, but also to the froward, etc. Therefore in the first Epistle to the Corinthians, 6., Paul praises judgments.

IT IS PROVED more fully by the Saintly Doctor in Hexaëmer. serm. 16. from the constant usage of the Church from the times of the Apostles onward; for St. Peter condemned Ananias and Sapphira, Act. 5., and in the following centuries there were always ecclesiastical and secular judgments in the Church, as is shown in the Tract. de Legibus, and p. 1. Tract. 1. Disputationibus Prooemialibus. These are confirmed by the ancient monuments of Councils, histories, and Decretals. Only this was most constantly provided: that ecclesiastical judgments should be held among ecclesiastics, as appears in the Decretis; and secular judgments among the faithful, if they could be held, as the Apostle teaches, prima Corinth. 6.

IT IS PROVED thirdly by the Saintly Doctor, in 2. dist. 44. art. 2. quaest. 1. ad 1., by the most solid argument of St. Peter, prima cap. 2., where, having described the state of the holy liberty of the New Testament, he concludes: Be subject, therefore, to every human creature for God's sake: whether to the King, as excelling: or to governors, as sent by him to punish malefactors, but for the praise of the good: for so is the will of God. From this the reason is drawn out, which he magnifies against the fourth argument of the following quaestio, and which Valencia uses, disp. 5. quaest 4 punct 2.: What is useful and necessary by natural law for the good of the commonwealth is not abolished, but established by the decrees of the Christian Religion; for Religion does not destroy, but perfects, the law of nature. But judges and judgments are necessary for the Christian commonwealth: Therefore. The minor is proved by the example of all nations, and from God's ordinance, Deuter. 16. Judges and Magistrates you shall constitute, that they may judge the people. Then the minor is evident: for if there were no judges and judgments by which the disputes of men would be terminated, and punishments assigned to crimes, and rewards to rightly performed political works, the greatest disturbance and overthrow would appear. With this reasoning he argues at greater length in p. 2. de Ecclesiastica Hier. cap. 2., as I shall say below.

NOR do the heretical adversaries lean on a firm foundation.

THEY OPPOSE, indeed, Matth. 5.: If any one will contend with you in judgment and take away your tunic, give him also your cloak.

THE SAINTLY DOCTOR ANSWERS on this passage, Lucae 6., that judgments are not forbidden; but contentions and quarrels, and the lust of vengeance, as St. Augustine says, epist. 5. Therefore, in sum, it must be held (says the Saintly Doctor) that the correction of a neighbor, or the hindering of evil, or the punishment of a crime committed by one who can and ought to hinder it — such as the Minister of the law — is not forbidden; but here the lust of revenge is forbidden and restrained, both as to the hand, and as to the sign, and as to the mind. In the same way St. Augustine says it is to be understood of what he said there also: And whoever shall strike you on one cheek, offer him the other also, and yet he himself, Ioan. 19., corrected the striker and did not offer the other cheek: similarly Paul, Actorum 23., struck on the cheek, answered: God shall strike you, you whited wall, and yet both were most patient in spirit, as the Saintly Doctor observes, loc. cit. ad locum Ioan., from St. Augustine, tract. 113. and epist. 5. — see him. Thus answers Valencia, disp. 3. quaest. 16. punct. 1. col. 742. and disp. 5. quaest. 4. p. 2., and Tannerus in the cited place.

THEY OPPOSE, secondly, Matth. 7.: Judge not, that you be not judged.

THE SAINTLY DOCTOR ANSWERS, p. 1. Concil. sect. 10., from St. Augustine, lib. 2. de serm. Domini in monte, cap. 28., that not every judgment is forbidden; but one rashly passed without firm reason. The same is the judgment of St. Hilar., Can. 5. in Matth.

THE SAINTLY DOCTOR ANSWERS, de septem Itineribus aeternitatis, Itinere primo, dist. 4., from St. Jerome, that the order of correction is taught, so that first, judging ourselves, we amend ourselves, casting the beam out of our own eye, before we contemplate the mote in another's eye.

THAT indeed he does not condemn every judgment is found in Ioan. 12.: Judge not according to the face, but judge just judgment, as St. Bonaventure there observes.

THEY OBJECT also from the first Epistle to the Corinthians, 6.: Brother contends with brother in judgment: and that before unbelievers? Indeed already altogether it is a fault in you, that you have judgments among yourselves.

IT IS ANSWERED, not that judgment is condemned, as I said above — indeed it is instituted; but that an undue one is reproved. Four conditions, however, are laid down by the Doctors that a judgment be just: thus St. Thomas, 2.2. quaest. 60. art. 1. and 6.; St. Bonaventure, in 2. dist. 44., in the cited places, and lib. 1. Pharetra, cap. 45.

T H E F I R S T is legitimate authority, such as ordinary Judges have, or Delegates, or even Arbitrators, who have that power by the law of nations over those who freely commit themselves to them. And such also would be one who, by a special judgment of God, fulfilled that office, as Phinees, Numer. 25., slew the Madianite and the Hebrew man, as the Saintly Doctor notes in the Biblia pauperum, cap. 51.

Because of the lack of this condition a Judgment is said to be unjust by usurpation, as St. Thomas says, art. 6.; St. Bonaventure, 2. dist. 44. art. 2. quaest. 1.

Y E T it can happen that the judgment of some Tyrant, who truly lacks legitimate power, be otherwise just and bind, namely if he be in peaceful possession. For otherwise the peaceful state of the commonwealth could not stand, unless what the ruler justly decreed is obeyed: Thus Valencia, punct. 2., who says that Victoria is held to have thought so, and it is the opinion of St. Bonaventure in the cited place, in the body and ad 2., where he teaches that the Tyrant, although he rules without legitimate power, and accordingly decides unjustly by reason of usurpation, must nevertheless be heard, if he decide justly, for the punishment of malefactors and the praise of the good, as is said in the first Epistle of Peter, 2.; and accordingly his decrees are just, and it is just to subject oneself to them.

T H E S E C O N D condition is, that the Judgment be conformed to the rule of Justice, namely, that what is decreed be just, even if the judge does not act from the virtue of Justice; but from the political rule, lest he be deprived — such was that Judge, Luc. 16., who finally sanctioned what was just for the Widow out of fear of punishment; as Valencia observes after St. Bonaventure on that passage. By the lack of this condition, the Judgment is said to be unjust, and it does not bind in conscience, as Innocent and Panormitanus teach, in cap. Plerique, extra de immunitate Ecclesiae; Sylvest., under the word Sententia, quaest. 11.; Sotus, lib. 3. de Iustitia, quaest. 4. art. 2.

¶ T H E T H I R D condition is the due judicial order: citation, hearing of the Accused, defenses, etc.

T H E F O U R T H condition, that he judge from the affection of Justice. So all the Interpreters of St. Thomas, quaest. 60. art. 2.; Suarez, 3. p. Tom. 5. disp. 4. sect. 7.; Tannerus, in the cited place.

Note, however, that this condition does not render the judgment invalid, as the cited authors warn. But an order failing in essentials renders it null. But of this there will be a sub-disputation.

A F I F T H condition is added: its conformity with the rules of Prudence. Now for this it ought to have two conditions: one, that it decide with due consideration; the other, that it not be from a depraved affection of hatred, or some other affection, or of gifts, etc.

¶ I T O U G H T also to be asserted that a Judge does not straightway lose his power because he lies in mortal sin, against Wicleph, whose error is condemned in the Council of Constant., sess. 8.

I T I S P R O V E D at length by the Saintly Doctor, in 2. dist. 44., where Peter, prima cap. 2., commands obedience to Masters, even to the froward. Iob 34. He makes the Hypocrite to reign. Osee 13. I will give them a King in my wrath. Ioan. 19. You would have no power unless it had been given you from above. The Saintly Doctor adduces examples of these in the Biblia, cap. 102. For thus of Nabuchodonosor it is said, Danielis 4.: Your power reaches to the ends of the whole earth. The same is asserted in cap. 5.; and to Ieroboam, 3. Reg., the Lord gave the kingdom of Israel, and to other wicked men, as the Saintly Doctor observes in the cited place. And Matth. 22.: Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's. Now Tiberius was impious, which the Saintly Doctor elegantly discourses upon in serm. 5. Dom. 22. post Pentecosten.

T H E R E A S O N also is that of St. Bonaventure which Valencia uses: because the foundation of jurisdiction is not the grace of God, but his will in the order of political governance, and often also for the punishment of peoples, as he discourses in 2. dist. 44. art. 2.

N O W it is controverted: whether the judgment of a judge is rendered mortally evil because it is passed by a judge constituted in mortal sin — and indeed in the times of St. Bonaventure most Theologians held this, at least concerning Ecclesiastical Judges: Alens., 3. p. quaest. 40. membr. 3.; St. Thomas, 4. dist. 19. quaest. 2. art. 2. St. Bonaventure seems to suspect it in those words, Ioan. 8.: He who is without sin among you, let him cast the first stone, where he speaks of the danger for such judges, and more especially for those living in public sin, because they scandalize the peoples whom they ought to admonish and call away from evil.

F O L L O W I N G this were Paludanus, 4. dist. 19. quaestione 3. artic. 3.; Sylvester, under the word correctio fraterna, quaestione 16.

T H E O P P O S I N G opinion, however, is the common one: Thus St. Thomas, hic, art. 2. ad 3., where he abandoned the former opinion. Thus Caietanus; Sotus, lib. 3. de Iustitia, quaest. 4. art. 2.; Navar., in Comment. super Rubricam, de Iud. num. 42.; Valencia, disp. 5. quaest. 4. punct. 2.; and it is St. Bonaventure's, in the cited place.

I A S S E R T with St. Bonaventure that there is some sin in that case, but I do not lay down that it is always mortal, but dangerous, lest it lead to mortal sin.

I T I S P R O V E D first by St. Bonaventure, loc. cit., from that saying of Christ, He who is without sin among you, let him cast the first stone, which passage Anselm there expounds thus, and St. Augustine, tract. 33., who say that those unworthy to judge the woman were brought forward by Christ. Since, therefore, such judges are unworthy, it follows in some way that they sin, as Valencia confesses, freely responding.

I T I S P R O V E D secondly by St. Bonaventure, lib. 1. Pharetrae, cap. 45., from many Fathers.

St. G R E G O R Y, homil. 26. in Evang.: It is hard, that one who knows not how to hold the measures of his own life should become judge of another's life. Lo, the peril to which a depraved man exposes himself, when he makes himself judge of another's life.

St. I S I D O R E, de summo bono, cap. 55. sent. 1.: None of the foolish or the wicked ought to be a judge: for the fool by sloth, the wicked man by wickedness, corrupts the truth which he has learned.

St. A U G U S T I N E, epistol. 174.: It is unjust that anyone should wish to judge another and be unwilling to be judged himself.

St. A M B R O S E, in 2. Apol. David, cap. 2.: Let each one who is about to judge another first judge himself, and let him not condemn lesser errors in another, when he himself has committed graver ones.

N O R does Valencia satisfy, saying that the Fathers only signify that it is illicit if it be done without humility. For indeed with relaxed sinews it cries out that it is in itself unjust and dangerous. Whether it be always mortal, the Saintly Doctor does not assert.

A S T O the foundation Valencia opposes — that there is a great difference between the use of the power of order and of jurisdiction, so that this is not so grave as to confect the Sacraments unworthily — I grant it; but he will not deny that even that is evil.

N O W the Saintly Doctor elegantly discourses on the requirements of Judges in the second part, de Eccl. Hier. cap. 2., where, likening them to the Angelic Virtues, he teaches: For the Virtues are Angels of the second order, of the middle Hierarchy, who are so called because of the strong and unchangeable virility for the reception of divine illuminations, not in any way weak, but virilely reduced to the imitation of God (as St. Dionysius teaches, cap. 8. de coelesti Hier.), not abandoning the deiform movement, but bearing it firmly into the superessential and potentific virtue deiformly proceeding. All these things he teaches are to be referred to those who have obtained the power of judging.

F O R, that peace and concord may be had in the Church of Christ, justice has been ordained by the Lord. But Justice and Peace accompany one another; for the Psalmist says: The mountains shall receive peace for the people, and the hills justice; because there would not be peace in the mountains, that is, in proud men, unless there were justice in the hills, that is, in the good and humble Prelates and Judges, in whom virility, or angelic virtuousness, is required, so that neither by blessing nor by cursing they be turned aside from the rectitude of justice, as is said of David, 2. Reg. 14.: But you, my lord the King, are as an Angel of God, who is moved neither by cursing nor by blessing. The judge, therefore, ought to be strong and virile, lest by fear, hatred, or love he be turned from the vigor of justice. Therefore the counsel is given, Ecclesiastici 7.: Do not seek to be made a judge, unless you have the strength to break through iniquities, lest perhaps you fear the face of the mighty. And Sap. 6.: Hear, O Kings and Judges, who judge the earth: to you is strength given by the Most High, etc.

N E X T, the Judges ought to be like the Virtues in the virtuous defense of justice, as is said, Ecclesiastici 4.: Fight for Justice, and be certain even unto death for justice. For when subjects see Prelates pusillanimous and tepid, they are easily terrified, as is said, Zach. 13.: I will strike the shepherd, and the sheep shall be scattered. Therefore it is said, Ezech. 3.: I have made you like an adamant and like flint; fear them not; where Marinus Brixiensis [reads] magnesem, because the Judge ought to be strong as the adamant, and at the same time benign, attracting, as the Saintly Doctor says. Therefore let them act virilely, lest there be said to them that of Ezech. 13.: You have not gone up against [them].

T H I R D L Y they are compared to the Virtues on account of the imitation of Divine wisdom, which the Judges ought to hold before their eyes in their sentences. For human wisdom is bound to imitate the virtue of divine justice. Therefore Sap. 6.: Love the light of wisdom, you who preside over the peoples, lest that of Hierem. 5. be said of them: Perhaps the poor and the foolish know not the way of the Lord, and the judgment of their God. I will go forth, therefore, etc. Isa. 56.: They have not known satiety; the pastors themselves have not understood understanding. Therefore it is said of the Virtues that virilely, through the reception of illuminations, they are reduced to the imitation of God. For those who are illuminated by God execute justice without offense, and this is said, Psalm. 88.: Lord, they shall walk in the light of your countenance, and in your justice shall they be exalted.

F O U R T H L Y they are like the Virtues in the swiftness of dispatching the causes of the poor; for true Justice, when it has become known to the judge, is not to be delayed in execution, but is to be decided and promulgated at once, and this especially in the causes of the poor, whose delay is harmful to them in many ways; and therefore the Virtues are said not to abandon the deiform movement, because virtuous Judges, the cause of the poor being known, do not defer judgment; as neither does God, of whom it is said, Ecclesiastici 35.: The Lord will not delay, but will judge the just, and will do judgment; and the Most Strong will not have patience with them.

F I F T H L Y they ought to be like the Virtues, not burdened with gifts, which are therefore forbidden, Exodi 23., Deuter. 16., because they blind and enervate the strength of Justice. Therefore they are likened to the Virtues, which arrive at the Potentific and superessential virtue, that is, in their movements and acts they regard only God, not their own advantage. For they are admonished, 2. Paralip. 19.: See what you do: for you do not exercise the judgment of men, but of God, as I also admonished above.

S I X T H L Y let them be likened to the heavenly Virtues, on account of the swift and virile liberation of the oppressed. For those Angels are held to restrain the demons, as Tob. 8.: Raphael seized the demon, and Dan. 6.: God sent his Angel and shut the mouths of the lions. For there are some powerful men, cruel as demons, oppressors of the innocent. Therefore it is said, Proverb. 24.: Snatch them who are led to death: and Iob 29.: Because I had delivered the poor man crying out, and the orphan who had no helper, I broke the jaws of the wicked, and from his teeth I snatched [the prey]. As in the first book of Reg. 17. David is said to have snatched the sheep and lambs from the jaws of the lion and the bear. So God commands, Isa. 1.: Judge for the orphan, help the oppressed, etc.

F I N A L L Y they ought to be like the Angelic Virtues, which are destined for working miracles, restoring eyes torn out, feet cut off, etc. For so also the Judges ought manfully to take care to restore goods unjustly taken away, of fame, body, fortune, and to compel unjust robbers to satisfaction; and this is figured in the deed of David: All things which the Amalekites had taken, nor was anything missing from the spoils, but all things whatsoever they had seized he brought back and restored. And 2. Reg. 12. Whom (he decreed) he shall repay fourfold, and 3. Reg. 3. Solomon restored the stolen infant to his mother.

H E P R O C E E D S elegantly to liken Princes and Kings to the Powers. Now the Powers are Angels, by whose special power the adverse powers are restrained, lest they harm as much as they would wish. Now St. Dionysius says of the heavenly Powers, cap. 8. de coelesti Hier.: The appellation of the holy Powers teaches a power both well adorned and undivided in its order around divine receptions, not tyrannically precipitating the inferior powers into things potestative, but potently reducing them into divine things, and assimilating them, as far as is lawful, to the potentific causal power, and converting the inferior things toward God, who is the prince of all power, according to the hierarchical disposition, making the divine and shining power resplendent in inferior things, etc.

Whence the Angels of that order restrain and curb all who impede the hierarchical order of prelation and subjection. Hence they do not allow the power of prelation to be contemned by subjects, nor do they permit subjects to be violently oppressed. In all these things Princes ought to imitate the heavenly Powers, so that they rule wisely, live orderly, potently repress and avenge evil, spare the innocent, and not allow injury to be done to wretched persons.

T H E R E F O R E they will be like the Powers, because animated by the love of Justice they avenge all wickedness upon the guilty and pursue the disturbers of peace, as is said, Machab. 3., of Judas. See the Seraphic Doctor discoursing throughout in the Angelic tongue.

A G A I N, and again resuming this discourse, part. 4. de Ecclesiastica Hier. cap. 3., he likens the judges of the earth to the heavens. To the heavens therefore also the first judges of the Church, the Apostles, were likened, Psal. 18., and thus Psal. 21.: The heavens shall declare his justice. Certainly the impious cannot represent the justices of the Lord; for it is said, Psalm. 49.: But to the sinner God said: why do you declare my justices? But the heavens, that is, heavenly men, whose conversation is in the heavens. I shall set down, therefore, parallels between Judges and the heavens.

A N D first indeed, the heavens are bodies so sincere that among the wise it is disputed whether they are composed of matter and form; incorruptible, inasmuch as where there is matter, there is potency for new forms, and accordingly for corruption. So the Judges ought to be so separated from every earthly admixture that it may be doubted whether they are concreted of flesh and blood, so that they do not feel the affections of parents or friends, and can be said, as it were: Melchisedech, King of Salem, without father, without mother, without genealogy — so incorruptible ought they to be with respect to gifts, to prayers, and to terrors.

N E X T, the Heavens are most subtle substances, diaphanous, transmitting the light with which they are suffused. So also the Judges ought to shine with integrity, purity, and innocence so preeminent, that they transfuse the heavenly light into the world by preeminent examples of life.

O F T E N U O U S substance, and fluid, are the heavens, according to the opinion of the Seraphic Doctor and of the more recent Astronomers, yet in their place standing in their orb Mathematically, as if riveted most firm in structure, or as Eugubinus read: and the species; so also the Judges, of a frail nature indeed, yet most firm, standing in the most perfect spherical figure, so that they halt about the mean of equity without deviation, and are, as it were, the mirror of Justice and of the other virtues.

T H E H E A V E N S are moved above the center of the world, along the line of the Equator, from east to west with a regular motion, in the space of 24 hours, and render day and night; and they carry with them all the stars, and indeed, the wandering and deviating ones, they vindicate by force from their errors toward the west, which meanwhile, repressed, shriek, as it were, mourning their sins. So also the Judges, above the Equator of commutative Justice, rendering rewards to the good and punishments to the impious, should most swiftly carry them along, correcting the wandering ones even unto the west.

W I T H an unequal eccentric motion above the points of Aries and Libra the heavens are seen to move from the West according to the succession of the signs, so that they distribute, as it were in Geometric proportion, lights and influxes to the various regions, and portion out the good with proportional distribution: but especially the Sun, for the preservation of all regions, bending between the Tropics, at due times toward the North through the boreal signs, and toward the South through the Antarctida, so that no region can complain that a portion of light and influx has been denied to it — which would happen if it were moved only above the Equator.

S O also the Judges ought not only to repay rewards and punishments by commutative Justice, but also by Distributive [Justice] above the Balance of Justice, where again an Equinox is made, the commutative nevertheless being also kept; and they are held, strong ones above Aries of gentle clemency, to apportion the goods of the commonwealth in Geometric proportion, the needs and merits of each member of the commonwealth having been computed; so that no one can justly complain that he is left naked in rigid winter, or scorched with want in torrid summer, but all are clothed with the flowers and fruits of the commonwealth, imitating the Sun of Justice, CHRIST.

T H E F I R M A M E N T is moved trembling above the pivots of Aries and Libra. So the Judges ought to fear lest they incline too much; and therefore, immovable, let them stand above the poles of Justice and mercy. For thus it is enjoined upon them: and now, O Kings, understand; be instructed, you who judge the earth. Serve the Lord in fear, and exult unto him with trembling; lay hold on discipline, lest you perish from the just way. Psalm. 2.

V E R Y S L O W L Y the eccentric of the Sun is moved, traversing one degree in each century of years, completing the year according to the measure of the Crystalline [heaven], the great year. So the Judges ought to be most deliberate in irregular movements, nor take a step unless the truth by which we are burned has been clearly recognized.

T H E M O O N, nearer to the earth, appearing great undeservedly, deviates with its moonlike motions among the other Wanderers. So those nearer to earthly things, in governing, deviate more in judgments and governances, and accordingly are sprinkled with earthly dregs. Such appears to our eyes the Ottoman Empire, a huge chaos of barbarians, where they hold cruelty for severity, and dissolution in place of mercy; therefore also, spotted, subject to earthly eclipses, often walking in the shadows of the earth, it is darkened by abomination, luxury, robberies, oppressions. Harsh appears the Moon, and wrinkled, full of hollow mountains and valleys; so that sordid empire, deformed with spots and wrinkles, strewn with earthly dregs, appears to wise eyes great, but to the most expert intellects most worthy of being cast away.

N O T far away is Mercury, Aser, intent upon treacherous trades and piratical navigations; who yet can say to the Ottoman predominant what that Pirate said to Alexander, or, according to some, to Pompey: You accuse me of robbing a single skiff, and do you not see yourself the despoiler of the world?

N E A R at hand is the effeminate kingdom of Venus in Assyria

Soon the body of the Sun, adored among the Persians.

H E R E the warlike Mars of the Thracians and the Greeks; the Jupiter of the Cretans; the Saturn of the Easterns, of the golden, as they fable, age. All these, wandering, are at last corrected by the Justice of God. These emblems are drawn from Bucellius at the end, and from Cassanaeus, p. p. Catalogi gloriae mundi.

L E T U S R A I S E our eyes to the solid Firmament, and set forth the images and stemmata also of Kings and Princes, even of Christians, that from them they may learn Justice.

T H E R E A R E in the circle of life, the Zodiac: the Aquarius of Lorraine; the Fishes, the Kings of Sicily. The Aries of the Argonauts. The Taurus of the Egyptians, and most noble of Certhes; the Taurus of Mechebel, and the Bulls of Savoy the Gemini; the Cancer of the Gambari; the Venetian Leo; the shining Virgo of the most powerful golden King of the Gauls, and the Libra adorned with lilies. The Scorpius of the Indians; the Sagittarius of the Scythians and Persians. The Leo of England, the Lyra of Ireland.

P R E S E N T are the Eagles of Austria, in the maternal boreal clime of the Crown; the Dragons of the Romans of Norway, the Bears of the Suevi; the Wolves and Horses of the Romulids. The Crosses of the Burgundians and of the Ethiopians. See also many other emblems of Justice in Bucellius and Cassanaeus, parte prima de gloria mundi.

Quaestio IX: In what way private judgment about the neighbor is illicit

Quaestio X: Whether Distributive JUSTICE differs in species from Commutative

Disputatio XXIV: On Restitution

Quaestio I: What RESTITUTION is

Quaestio II: Whether RESTITUTION is necessary for salvation

Quaestio III: Who is bound to RESTORE

Dubitatio I: Whether he is a true cause of loss without whom the loss would still have followed

Dubitatio II: On the indirect causes of loss

Dubitatio III: Whether one who has promised three or four times to restore, and has not restored, is to be absolved before restitution

Quaestio IV: To whom RESTITUTION is to be made

Quaestio V: What ought to be restored

Dubitatio I: Whether the goods of fortune are to be restored in the same way

Dubitatio II: In what manner RESTITUTION is to be made for goods of the body

Dubitatio III: Whether, and how, RESTITUTION of Fame, and Honor, is to be made

Dubitatio IV: On the restitution of goods of the soul

Dubitatio V: When a thing acquired by contract is to be restored

Dubitatio VI: When things acquired by donation ought to be restored

Dubitatio VII: When things acquired by prescription are to be restored

Dubitatio VIII: When a thing acquired as wages for the function of an office is to be restored

Dubitatio IX: Whether the wages of harlotry are to be restored

Dubitatio X: When things acquired by fowling, fishing, and hunting are to be restored

Dubitatio XI: When things acquired by the use of common things are to be restored

Dubitatio XII: Whether things acquired in illicit games are to be restored

Dubitatio XIII: Which things are to be restored on account of finding

Dubitatio XIV: On the restitution of goods impeded by violence, fraud, or evil intention

Dubitatio XV: Whether anyone is bound to restore defrauded customs duties

Dubitatio XVI: What form is to be observed in a just tribute

Quaestio VI: How much is to be Restored

Quaestio VII: When restitution is to be made, and the causes excusing from it

Dubitatio I: Whether entrance into Religion excuses from Restitution

Dubitatio II: Whether cession of goods excuses from restitution

Dubitatio III: On the causes excusing from Restitution on the part of the creditor

Dubitatio IV: On the causes excusing from restitution on the part of the debtor

Dubitatio V: On the causes excusing from Restitution on the part of the public authority

Quaestio VIII: Where restitution is to be made

Quaestio IX: How restitution is to be made

Quaestio X: In what order restitution is to be made

Quaestio XI: What Acceptance of Persons is, and what kind of sin

Quaestio XII: Whether, and how, it is a sin of acceptance of persons to choose the unworthy, or less deserving, for benefices

Quaestio XIII: Whether Acceptance of persons has place in the showing of honor, and reverence

Quaestio XIV: Whether acceptance of persons finds a place in the sentences of Judges

Dubitatio I: Whether a JUDGE can, without the note of acceptance of persons, adhere to the Favor of friends, when the law is doubtful among the Doctors

Disputatio XXV: On Homicide

Quaestio I: What Homicide is, and of how many kinds

Quaestio II: On homicide from deliberately, insidiously, and treacherously intending it

Quaestio III: Whether one who commands is to be burdened with the same guilt, and punishment as the one who executes

Quaestio IV: Whether an attempt at homicide, and other crimes, is to be punished with the same penalty as the crime consummated

Quaestio V: What are the punishments of voluntary Homicide

Quaestio VI: Whether it is lawful to kill a man with the moderation of blameless defense, for the defense of himself or his goods

Dubitatio I: Whether it is lawful to kill someone to preserve honor, not by fleeing etc.

Dubitatio II: Whether one who is attacked is bound in some case to kill the aggressor

Dubitatio III: Whether it is lawful, in defense of one's own goods, to kill a thief

Dubitatio IV: Whether, in defense of Chastity, it is lawful to kill the Assailant

Quaestio VII: Whether, and how, MONOMACHIA (dueling) is illicit

Quaestio VIII: Whether it is lawful for a Husband to kill a Wife caught in adultery, and a father his daughter, and a brother his Sister, together with the seducer

Quaestio IX: Whether it is lawful to kill oneself

Dubitatio I: Whether it is lawful to shorten our life by mortifications

Dubitatio II: Whether, to avoid a sin or another evil, it is lawful to kill oneself

Dubitatio III: Whether, for the life of the neighbor, it is lawful to give oneself over to death

Dubitatio IV: When we are bound to die for the salvation of souls

Quaestio X: Whether a pregnant Mother may, to save her own life, procure the abortion of the fetus

Quaestio XI: On accidental Homicide

Quaestio XII: Whether a JUDGE can condemn an innocent man to death who has been proven guilty in the trial

Quaestio XIII: Whether Princes can grant license to kill outlaws

Quaestio XIV: On the Restitution owed on account of homicide, or mutilation

Quaestio XV: Whether the mutilation of a limb is ever lawful

Quaestio XVI: Whether it is lawful to imprison or beat another

Disputatio XXVI: On Theft, and Rapine

Quaestio I: What Dominion is

Quaestio II: Whether it is lawful to have private dominion over things

Quaestio III: What THEFT is

Quaestio IV: What quantity is required for mortal sin in Theft

Dubitatio I: What is the grave quantity of theft for Sons, Wives, and Religious

Quaestio V: Whether Theft is mortal when, from many tiny thefts, there supervenes a particle making the thing grave

Quaestio VI: Whether in extreme, or urgent, necessity it is lawful to take what belongs to another

Quaestio VII: On the Thefts of Religious

Quaestio VIII: Whether men can be reduced to slavery, and sold

Quaestio IX: Whether slaves can wrest themselves from their Masters

Quaestio X: Whether it is lawful, by private authority, to recover what is ours

Quaestio XI: On the punishment of Thieves

Quaestio XII: On the restitution of thefts

Disputatio XXVII: On the JUDGE

Quaestio I: Whether power is necessary in a JUDGE

Quaestio II: Whether a JUDGE ought to follow the truth, and therefore be wise

Quaestio III: Whether the acts of a JUDGE who has not a true but only a putative title are valid, such that not even he sins

Quaestio IV: Whether the POPE can subject himself to someone's judgment

Quaestio V: Whether goodness is necessary in a JUDGE

Quaestio VI: On the external purity of the hands of the Judge

Quaestio VII: Whether excommunicated JUDGES sin in judging, and judge invalidly

Quaestio VIII: On the order to be observed by a JUDGE

Dubitatio I: On the mode of proceeding by Denunciation

Dubitatio II: On the mode of proceeding by Accusation

Dubitatio III: On the mode of proceeding by Inquisition

Disputatio XXVIII: On the Accused

Quaestio I: On the bringing of the Accused to the Tribunal

Quaestio II: Whether the Accused is bound to confess a crime half-proven

Quaestio III: Whether an ACCUSED, infamed for one crime, can be interrogated also about others

Quaestio IV: Whether one convicted of a crime can be interrogated about hidden accomplices, of whom there is no infamy

Quaestio V: Whether an Accused, unjustly denying a true crime for which he was to be condemned to a pecuniary penalty, is bound to pay, and whether he is subject to restitution

Quaestio VI: Whether a Reus, unjustly denying the truth, is bound to retract before the end of the Trial, when he is to be condemned

Quaestio VII: Whether, if the Accused is interrogated again, he can give only a relative answer, saying: as I answered

Quaestio VIII: How the ACCUSED ought to conduct himself in the examination, when pressed by the Judge's iniquitous interrogations

Quaestio IX: Whether it is lawful for the ACCUSED to appeal to another Judge

Quaestio X: Whether, and how, the ACCUSED can defend himself

Quaestio XI: Whether the Accused can flee, and how, and when

Disputatio XXIX: ON WITNESSES

Quaestio I: Whether anyone is sometimes bound to bear witness

Quaestio II: Who can be WITNESSES in a trial

Quaestio III: On the Injustice of false Witnesses

Quaestio IV: What penalties are established for false Witnesses

Disputatio XXX: On the Advocate

Quaestio I: Who can, and ought, to exercise this office

Quaestio II: On the sins of a wicked Advocate

Quaestio III: Whether an ADVOCATE is bound on account of light fault

Quaestio IV: Whether an Advocate, engaged by the year, is worthy of his fee in that year in which he did nothing

Quaestio V: Whether an Advocate is bound to defend a Client gratis in grave necessity

Quaestio VI: Whether an Advocate can receive gifts

Disputatio XXXI: On the Notary and the Tabellion

Quaestio I: On the Justice, or Injustice, of the Notary and the Tabellion

Disputatio XXXII: On Contumely

Quaestio I: What Contumely is, and whence it arises

Quaestio II: How a Christian ought to conduct himself when assailed by contumelies

Disputatio XXXIII: On Detraction

Quaestio I: What Detraction is, and of how many kinds

Quaestio II: Whether detraction is a mortal sin

Quaestio III: Whether it is mortal to reveal a hidden crime to one, or two prudent men, who will keep silent about it

Quaestio IV: Whether material Detraction, which comes from talkativeness, is deadly

Quaestio V: Whether to be silent about a good that has been blackened is mortal

Quaestio VI: On the various cases in which detraction seems to be excused

Quaestio VII: Whether it is ever lawful to defame another with a falsehood, or to open his hidden crime

Quaestio VIII: Whether it is lawful to narrate a crime, notorious in one place, in another, where it is not known

Quaestio IX: Whether it is lawful to open someone's hidden crime to spare him torments

Quaestio X: Whether anyone can defame himself

Disputatio XXXIV: On Whispering, Mockery, and Cursing

Quaestio I: On the malice of Whispering

Quaestio II: On the malice of Mockery

Quaestio III: On Cursings

Tractatus II: E CONTRACTIBUS

Proemium I: Prooemium

Disputatio I: FIRST. On CONTRACTS in general

Quaestio I: What a CONTRACT is, and of how many kinds

Quaestio II: Whether for the validity of a Contract the intention of contracting, and of binding oneself, is required

Quaestio III: How Error, or fraud, vitiates a Contract

Quaestio IV: How fear voids a Contract

Quaestio V: On conditional Contracts

Quaestio VI: On the obligation that results from a valid Contract

Quaestio VII: Which persons can enter into a Contract, and which cannot

Quaestio VIII: Whether, and when, it is lawful to withdraw from a contract, the other party objecting

Disputatio II: On the acquisition of Dominion over Persons, and other things, through the Division of things Acquired

Quaestio I: By what right the first division, and subjection, of things was made

Quaestio II: On the acquisition of DOMINION over Barbarians

Quaestio III: On the acquisition of DOMINION over irrational creatures

Disputatio III: On Promise

Quaestio I: What a PROMISE is, and how it differs from a DONATION

Quaestio II: Whether a simple PROMISE, once accepted, binds in justice

Quaestio III: Whether a merely internal PROMISE, made to a man, binds

Quaestio IV: Whether an external Promise binds before it is accepted

Quaestio V: Whether a PROMISE binds when made for a base cause

Disputatio IV: ON DONATION

Quaestio I: What DONATION is, and of how many kinds

Quaestio II: Who can donate, and what

Quaestio III: On the revocations of donations

Disputatio V: On Buying, and Selling

Quaestio I: What EMPTIO (buying), and VENDITIO (selling), are

Quaestio II: Which persons can buy, and sell

Quaestio III: Which things can be sold

Quaestio IV: Of how many kinds is the price of things

Quaestio V: Whether, for certain causes, it is lawful to reduce below the minimum price, or raise above the maximum

Quaestio VI: Whether on account of ceasing profit, or emerging loss, the price can be raised above the maximum

Quaestio VII: Whether it is lawful to sell more dearly above the top price, awaiting payment, than with money paid down

Quaestio VIII: Whether Stocolia and Barocolia (Italian), Stocch (Spanish, MOHATRA) are lawful

Quaestio IX: To what extent Buying, and Selling, in Monopolies is illicit

Quaestio X: Whether the seller is bound to disclose a grave defect of the thing

Quaestio XI: Whether a thing sold, not yet delivered, perishes to the buyer

Quaestio XII: On the rescission of a sale, and purchase, on account of fraud etc.

Quaestio XIII: Whether a sale with a pact of buying back is lawful

Disputatio VI: On the loan and Usury

Quaestio I: What MUTUUM (loan) and USURY are, and why the latter is a sin

Quaestio II: Whether it is USURY to lend so that, when I have need, you lend back to me, or buy from me at a just price

Quaestio III: Whether it is lawful to lend with the pact that the one who receives the loan confer an office, or ecclesiastical benefice

Quaestio IV: Whether it is USURY to receive, beyond the principal, any other gain whatever besides the money

Quaestio V: Whether, and what, the lender can receive on account of danger, and ceasing profit

Quaestio VI: Whether it is lawful to lend wheat, or something else, with the pact that it be restored in the same measure, even if the price has risen at the time of restitution

Quaestio VII: Whether, and how, gain acquired from Usury is to be restored

Quaestio VIII: Whether it is lawful to seek a loan from a Usurer

Disputatio VII: ON CENSUSES (annuities)

Quaestio I: What a Census is, and of how many kinds

Quaestio II: Whether a Census can lawfully be sold

Quaestio III: From which things a CENSUS can be sold by natural law

Quaestio IV: Until what time a CENSUS can be sold

Quaestio V: What conditions are required for a CENSUS

Disputatio VIII: ON EXCHANGES

Quaestio I: What CAMBIUM (exchange) is, and of how many kinds

Quaestio II: Whether in petty exchange it is lawful to receive something above the value of the coin fixed by law

Quaestio III: Whether in local exchange, or by letters, when the first Campsor receives, so that he may restore elsewhere, he can gain something

Quaestio IV: Whether CAMBIUM is lawful, when for the Campsor a Procurator of the Campsor answers with the moneys of the Campsor himself

Quaestio V: Whether the said Recambia are lawful only on account of ceasing profit, or emerging loss

Quaestio VI: Whether the solutions, and provisions, that Money-changers receive are lawful

Disputatio IX: On the Contract of Partnership

Quaestio I: In what the CONTRACT OF PARTNERSHIP consists, and what is required that it be just

Quaestio II: Whether, and how, other contracts can be united with the Contract of Partnership

Quaestio III: Whether the contract by which, for secure capital, some certain gain is received annually is lawful

Disputatio X: On Emphyteusis, Letting, Hiring, and the Feud

Quaestio I: What EMPHYTEUSIS is

Quaestio II: What Locatio (letting) is

Quaestio III: What a FEUDUM (fief) is, and of how many kinds

Disputatio XI: On Testaments

Quaestio I: What a TESTAMENT is, and of how many kinds

Quaestio II: What solemnity is required for a Testament, closed and open

Quaestio III: Who can, and ought, to make testaments, or be instituted heirs

Quaestio IV: Whether an heir instituted in a testament invalid through defect of solemnity by civil law can pursue the inheritance in the forum of conscience, despoiling the heir succeeding ab intestato

Quaestio V: By what means a Testament is revocable

Quaestio VI: What obligation Heirs instituted by testament undertake

Disputatio XII: On Legacies

Quaestio I: What a Legacy is, and of how many kinds

Quaestio II: Whether legacies ought to be paid to all those for whom they are made, and how

Quaestio III: Which things can be bequeathed

Quaestio IV: What a Pious, or Privileged, Legacy is

Quaestio V: By what means legacies are caducous, such that the Heir is not bound to pay them

Tractatus III: E RELIGIONE

Proemium I: Prooemium

Disputatio I: FIRST. On RELIGION in general

Quaestio I: What the Virtue of RELIGION is

Quaestio II: Whether Religion is a Virtue

Quaestio III: Whether LATRIA, or RELIGION, is a special virtue

Quaestio IV: Whether RELIGION is a Cardinal Virtue

Quaestio V: How widely the acts of Religion extend

Quaestio VI: Whether RELIGION is necessary

Quaestio VII: Whether true RELIGION ought to be one

Disputatio II: ON DEVOTION

Quaestio I: What Devotion is, and of how many kinds

Disputatio III: ON PRAYER

Quaestio I: What Prayer is

Quaestio II: Of how many kinds is PRAYER

Quaestio III: Whether PRAYER is necessary

Quaestio IV: Whether Prayer is not only petitory, but also satisfactory, and meritorious

Quaestio V: What conditions are required for perfect Prayer

Quaestio VI: What is to be sought in Prayer: where the petitions of the Lord's Prayer are expounded

Quaestio VII: Who ought to pray

Quaestio VIII: Who is to be prayed to

Quaestio IX: For whom one ought to pray

Quaestio X: How one ought to pray

Quaestio XI: On that mode of praying, the Canonical Hours

Dubitatio I: Whether Attention is necessary for the Office to be recited by precept

Dubitatio II: Whether one reciting the Office satisfies by reciting another for it

Dubitatio III: Whether to interrupt the parts of the same Hour

Dubitatio IV: Whether one omitting all the hours of one Day commits more sins

Dubitatio V: Whether one reciting the Divine office in Choir with voice very much lowered, so that he is not heard, satisfies

Dubitatio VI: Whether Canons conversing in Choir are capable of distributions

Dubitatio VII: Whether one who recites the office privately ought to hear himself

Dubitatio VIII: Whether one who says the office with a notable cutting off, or truncating, of syllables satisfies

Dubitatio IX: Whether one who says a great part of the office with the mind not intending to satisfy satisfies

Dubitatio X: What is the gravity of the matter in the omission of a Canonical Hour

Disputatio IV: ON ADORATION

Quaestio I: Whether Latria is in the genus of some virtue

Quaestio II: Whether Latria is distinct from Dulia

Quaestio III: On Sacred places, destined for adorations

Disputatio V: ON SACRIFICE

Quaestio I: What a SACRIFICE is

Quaestio II: What is required that a SACRIFICE be right

Quaestio III: Whether Sacrifice is of natural law

Quaestio IV: Whether besides Sacrifice, first-fruits are to be offered

Disputatio VI: On Tithes

Quaestio I: Whether Tithes are to be paid

Quaestio II: From which things tithes are to be paid

Quaestio III: To whom, and by whom tithes are to be paid

Quaestio IV: Where, and when, Tithes are to be paid

Quaestio V: By what authority the payment of tithes is to be exacted

Tractatus IV: E VOTIS

Proemium I: Prooemium

Disputatio I: FIRST. ON THE VOW

Quaestio I: What a VOW is, and what its conditions are

Quaestio II: What deliberation is required for a VOW

Quaestio III: Whether one promising something to God, and knowing the obligation, yet having the intention of not binding himself, is bound by Vow

Quaestio IV: Whether a Votive promise is made to God alone

Quaestio V: How error, or ignorance, concerning a VOW causes involuntariness

Quaestio VI: Whether fear inflicted makes a Vow invalid

Quaestio VII: Whether a necessary thing can be the matter of a Vow

Quaestio VIII: Whether a VOW is only about some good

Quaestio IX: Whether a VOW is only about a better good, or truly also about a lesser good

Quaestio X: Whether a VOW about a thing that can have a good, and an evil, outcome is valid

Quaestio XI: Whether any obligation arises from a VOW, and what it is

Quaestio XII: Whether the immature are bound by Vows

Quaestio XIII: What, and what kind of, is the power of invalidating VOWS

Quaestio XIV: On the power of the Prelates of Religious to invalidate VOWS

Quaestio XV: Whether a husband can invalidate all the Vows of his wife, beyond the Vow of chastity

Quaestio XVI: Whether a husband can invalidate the Vow of Chastity emitted by his wife without license, the marriage standing, and to be fulfilled then

Quaestio XVII: Whether a Husband can invalidate the Vows of his Wife, emitted without his license, to be fulfilled at the time the marriage is dissolved

Quaestio XVIII: Whether a husband can invalidate the Vows of his wife, emitted before marriage

Quaestio XIX: *Whether the Vows of a wife, made without the license of the husband, revive when the marriage is dissolved.*

Quaestio XX: *Whether a husband can invalidate the Vows of his wife emitted by his license: the Vow of Chastity excepted.*

Quaestio XXI: Whether a husband can revoke the Vow of Chastity of his wife, emitted by his license

Quaestio XXII: Whether a Husband can invalidate the Vows of his Wife, emitted under the preceding dominion of a father, or first husband

Quaestio XXIII: Whether a Wife can invalidate certain vows of her husband, and which

Quaestio XXIV: Whether parents, or Tutors, can invalidate all the Vows of their immature Sons

Quaestio XXV: Whether a Father, and Curator, can invalidate the personal Vows of their adolescent sons

Quaestio XXVI: Which real, or mixed, Vows of adolescents can be invalidated by the father

Quaestio XXVII: To whom the faculty of invalidating the Vows of adolescents, and the immature, belongs

Quaestio XXVIII: Which Vows of servants the Lords can invalidate

Quaestio XXIX: Whether in the Church there is power to dispense from Vows

Quaestio XXX: Whether a cause is required for a dispensation, and which

Quaestio XXXI: Whether, and how, the commutation of Vows is to be made

Quaestio XXXII: Whether commutation requires a cause

Question XXXIII

Disputatio II: SECOND. ON THE STATE OF RELIGION, OR ON SOLEMN VOWS

§ I: On the vows of Religious in common

Quaestio I: In what solemn vows differ from simple vows

Quaestio II: Whether solemn VOWS are necessary for the state of a Religious

Quaestio III: Whether, and how, this state is Holy

Quaestio IV: Whether the three vows of Poverty, Chastity, and Obedience are essential to Religion

Quaestio V: Whether the Pontiff can dispense in solemn Vows

Quaestio VI: Who are to be received into Religion

Quaestio VII: On NOVICES

Quaestio VIII: What is required for profession in Religion

Quaestio IX: Whether, and how, Religious are bound to perfection

Quaestio X: Whence the greater perfection of Religion is to be taken

Quaestio XI: On passing to another Religion

Quaestio XII: Whether the three vows of Poverty, Chastity, and Obedience are essential to Religion

Quaestio XIII: Whether the Pontiff can dispense in solemn Vows

Quaestio XIV: Who are to be received into Religion

Quaestio XV: On Novices

Quaestio XVI: What is required for profession in Religion

Quaestio XVII: Whether, and how, Religious are bound to perfection

Quaestio XVIII: Whence the greater perfection of Religion is to be taken

Quaestio XIX: On passing to another Religion

Quaestio XX: On Religious to be expelled

Quaestio XXI: Whether every Religious is bound to all the counsels

Quaestio XXII: Whether Religious ought to teach, preach, etc.

Quaestio XXIII: Whether Religious ought to labor with their hands

Quaestio XXIV: Whether it is lawful for Religious to transact secular business

Disputatio III: On the Vow of OBEDIENCE

Quaestio I: Whether the vow of obedience is chief among the Religious vows

Quaestio II: What obedience is promised in Religion

Quaestio III: Whether Religious are bound to obey Prelates in all things

Quaestio IV: Whether one doubting whether the thing commanded is lawful is bound to obey the Prelate

Quaestio V: Whether all the statutes of Religious Orders bind under sin

Disputatio IV: On the Vow of Poverty

Quaestio I: On the essence of this Vow

Quaestio II: Which Poverty is more excellent

Quaestio III: Whether mendicancy befits Religious Poverty

Quaestio IV: Whether Religious, on account of Poverty, ought to be clothed in mean garments

Quaestio V: Whether austere fare is owed to Religious Poverty

Quaestio VI: How Poverty is violated

Dubitatio I: Whether Prelates can concede to Religious an annual peculium

Dubitatio II: Whether a Religious, having superfluities by license of his superior, is a proprietor

Dubitatio III: Dubitatio III

Dubitatio IV: Whether a Legacy stands for a Religious, as pertaining to him precisely

Quaestio VII: On the penalties, and marks, of a Proprietor

Disputatio V: On the Vow of CHASTITY

Quaestio I: What difference there is between Cloistered, and Clerical, chastity

Quaestio II: From what time the solemn vow of Chastity began to dissolve a subsequent marriage

Quaestio III: Whether one vowing Chastity solemnly dissolves a marriage, whether consummated, or ratified, and by what law, and at what time this began to be done

Quaestio IV: By what law, and at what time, Religious Chastity began to be sealed with cloister

Quaestio V: By what means cloister is violated

Quaestio VI: Whether dispensation can fall upon Religious chastity, and who can dispense in cloister

Disputatio VI: On the Oath

Quaestio I: What an OATH is, and of how many kinds

Quaestio II: Whether it is lawful to swear by GOD

Quaestio III: Whether it is lawful to swear by creatures

Quaestio IV: What is required for an Oath

Quaestio V: Whether, and how, it is a Sin to swear without Truth

Quaestio VI: Whether, and what sin, is an OATH made without justice

Quaestio VII: Whether, and what sin, is an OATH lacking judgment

Quaestio VIII: Whether, and how, a custom of swearing is evil

Quaestio IX: When precisely one swearing incautiously from custom sins mortally

Quaestio X: What sin it is to swear dolosely

Quaestio XI: Whether it is lawful to require an Oath from a perjurer

Quaestio XII: Whether, and when, it is lawful to require an Oath from an Idolater

Quaestio XIII: On the obligation of a promissory Oath in itself

Quaestio XIV: Whether dolous Oaths bind

Quaestio XV: Whether an Oath extorted by injury, as of paying usuries, binds

Quaestio XVI: Whether an Oath extorted by fear binds

Quaestio XVII: Whether someone's Oath, by fraud, or error, or ignorance, is void

Quaestio XVIII: Whether an incautious promissory Oath binds

Quaestio XIX: Whether an Oath confirms contracts that could otherwise be voided

Quaestio XX: On the means of removing the obligation of an Oath

Quaestio XXI: On the Penalties imposed upon Perjuries

Disputatio VII: On Adjuration

Quaestio I: What ADJURATION is, and by what means it is made

Quaestio II: Whom it is lawful to adjure

Disputatio VIII: On Divine Praises

Quaestio I: NICA. On the Nature, and quality, of Divine praises

Disputatio IX: On the Observance of Feast Days

Quaestio I: On the origin of FEAST days

Quaestio II: Whose it is to institute FEASTS to be observed under mortal sin

Quaestio III: Whether mortal sins on a Feast are forbidden by this precept

Quaestio IV: Whether licit liberal work becomes servile because it is done for gain

Quaestio V: Which are servile works, forbidden on the Feast day

Dubitatio I: Which works are forbidden by Canon law on a feast

Quaestio VI: That a time of servile labor induces a grave transgression of the FEAST

Quaestio VII: On the causes excusing from violation of the Feast

Quaestio VIII: Whether, having merely heard a SACRED (sermon), it is forbidden to idle the whole Feast day

Disputatio X: On Superstition

Quaestio I: SUPERSTITION, what it is, and of how many kinds

Quaestio II: On Divination by the Stars

Quaestio III: On Divination by the Elements, and other mixed things

Quaestio IV: On Divination from Dreams

Quaestio V: On Sortileges

Quaestio VI: On superstitious observances for works

Quaestio VII: On the malefices of Witches

Quaestio VIII: Whether it is lawful to consult Witches, that at least the malefices be removed

Quaestio IX: On the penalties of Witches, etc.

Disputatio XI: ON THE TEMPTATION OF GOD

Quaestio I: What TEMPTATION is, and of how many kinds

Disputatio XII: ON SACRILEGE

Quaestio I: What Sacrilege is, and of how many kinds

Disputatio XIII: ON SIMONY

Quaestio I: What SIMONY is, and of how many kinds

Quaestio II: How Simony is recognized on the part of the object

Quaestio III: In what way Simony is committed on the part of the act of exchange itself

Quaestio IV: On the Penalties of Simoniacs

Disputatio XIV: ON THE OTHER VIRTUES ANNEXED TO JUSTICE

§ I: ON PIETY

Quaestio I: What PIETY is, and what kind of Virtue

Quaestio II: What reverence is to be shown to Parents

Quaestio III: What obedience is to be shown to Parents by Sons

Quaestio IV: How, and when, Sons are bound to relieve Parents

Quaestio V: On the obligation of Parents toward Sons

Quaestio VI: In which cases Parents can disinherit Sons

Quaestio VII: Whether Sons can ever refuse aliment to Parents, and disinherit them

Quaestio VIII: To what a Woman is bound, who has a Son from adultery, or has substituted one

Quaestio IX: On the mutual obligation of Servants, and Masters

Quaestio X: On the obligation of Brothers toward Brothers, and Sisters, and conversely

§ II: On Observance, Reverence, and Dulia

Quaestio I: On Observance, and Reverence

Quaestio II: On Dulia

§ III: ON OBEDIENCE, and DISOBEDIENCE

Quaestio I: On Observance, and Reverence

Quaestio II: On DISOBEDIENCE

§ IV: ON GRATITUDE, and VINDICATION, and the Vices opposed to them

Quaestio I: On GRATITUDE

Quaestio II: On INGRATITUDE

Quaestio III: On Vindication

§ V: On Truth, Friendship, Liberality, Epikeia, and the vices opposed to them: On the gift of Piety, and the Precepts of the Decalogue pertaining to Justice

Quaestio I: On TRUTH

Quaestio II: On the LIE

Dubitatio I: What a Lie is

Dubitatio II: Of how many kinds is a Lie

Dubitatio III: Whether every lie is intrinsically a sin

Dubitatio IV: Whether a Lie is mortal of its genus

Dubitatio V: Whether every Lie is mortal for perfect men

Dubitatio VI: Whether among the degrees of Lie there is a most grave, and a most light

Dubitatio VII: On the others that are reduced to Lying

Quaestio III: On Friendship

Quaestio IV: On Liberality

Dubitatio I: On Avarice

Dubitatio II: On PRODIGALITY

Quaestio V: On EPIKEIA

Quaestio VI: On the GIFT OF PIETY

Tractatus V: E VIRTUTE FORTITUDINIS

Proemium I: Prooemium

Disputatio I: FIRST. ON FORTITUDE

Quaestio I: Whether FORTITUDE is a Virtue, and which

Quaestio II: On the GIFT OF FORTITUDE

Quaestio III: On Martyrdom

Dubitatio I: Whether MARTYRDOM confers first grace

Dubitatio II: Whether the Baptism of infants can be supplied by martyrdom

Quaestio IV: On the precepts of Fortitude

Quaestio V: On the Vices opposed to Fortitude

Disputatio II: On the Virtues joined to Fortitude

Quaestio I: On Magnanimity

Quaestio II: On the Vices opposed to MAGNANIMITY

Quaestio III: On MAGNIFICENCE

Quaestio IV: On the Vices opposed to MAGNIFICENCE

Quaestio V: On PATIENCE

Quaestio VI: On the Vices opposed to PATIENCE

Quaestio VII: On PERSEVERANCE

Quaestio VIII: On the Vices opposed to PERSEVERANCE

Tractatus VI: E TEMPERANTIA

Proemium I: Prooemium

Disputatio I: FIRST. ON THE VIRTUE OF TEMPERANCE

Quaestio I: Which Virtue Temperance is, and of what kind

Quaestio II: Which Vices are contrary to TEMPERANCE

Quaestio III: On the parts of TEMPERANCE

Quaestio IV: On Shamefastness

Quaestio V: On Honesty

Quaestio VI: On Abstinence

Dubitatio I: What FASTING is, and of how many kinds

Dubitatio II: In what way natural Fasting is broken

Dubitatio III: Whether Fasting of itself is a good work, and a precept

Dubitatio IV: From what one must abstain in the Ecclesiastical Fast

Dubitatio V: On the evening collation

Dubitatio VI: On the hour of refreshment on the Fast day

Dubitatio VII: Who are bound to fast

Quaestio VII: On SOBRIETY

Quaestio VIII: On CHASTITY

Quaestio IX: On Virginity

Dubitatio I: Whether Virginity is a Virtue

Dubitatio II: Whether Virginity excels conjugal Continence

Dubitatio III: Whether the reward of Virginity is the Aureole

Quaestio X: On CONTINENCE

Dubitatio I: On MILDNESS

Quaestio XI: On CLEMENCY

Quaestio XII: On MODESTY

Quaestio XIII: On HUMILITY

Disputatio II: On the Vices opposed to the Virtue of TEMPERANCE

Quaestio I: On GLUTTONY

Quaestio II: On Drunkenness

Quaestio III: On LUST

Dubitatio I: What LUST is, and of how many kinds

Dubitatio II: Whether in the genus of Lust there is parvity of matter

Dubitatio III: On FORNICATION

Dubitatio IV: On STUPRATION

Dubitatio V: On INCEST

Dubitatio VI: On ADULTERY

Dubitatio VII: On SACRILEGE

Dubitatio VIII: On sins against nature

Dubitatio IX: On the lust of spouses

Dubitatio X: On ABDUCTION

Quaestio IV: On INCONTINENCE

Quaestio V: On ANGER

Quaestio VI: On CRUELTY

Question VII

Dubitatio I: On the adornment of Women

Dubitatio II: On Immodesty in words, gestures, jokes, and games

Quaestio VIII: On P R I D E

Quaestio IX: LAST. On the other Vices opposed to the potential parts of Temperance

Tractatus VII: E VARIIS HOMINUM STATIBUS, ET OFFICIIS

Proemium I: Prooemium

Disputatio I: FIRST. ON STATES, AND PERFECTION IN GENERAL

Quaestio I: What a STATE is, and of how many kinds

Quaestio II: On the state of perfection

Dubitatio I: In what the Perfection of man consists

Dubitatio II: What Perfection can be had in this life

Dubitatio III: Who are in the state of Perfection

Quaestio III: Whether some who are not in the state of perfection perform, by reason of their office, works more perfect than some who are in the state of Perfection

Disputatio II: On the State of the Bishop

Quaestio I: Whether a BISHOP is in the state of perfection

Quaestio II: Of what kind he must be who is assumed to the Episcopate

Quaestio III: Whether it is lawful to seek, or refuse, an Episcopate

Quaestio IV: Whether Residence is necessary for Bishops, and by what law

Quaestio V: Whether the Church, and Bishops, have dominion over certain temporal things

Quaestio VI: Whether Bishops, and other Ecclesiastics, have dominion over revenues that are superfluous to their state

Quaestio VII: Whether those Bishops who were formerly Religious are bound to Regular observance

Disputatio III: On the State of Regular Prelacy

Quaestio I: Whether the state of Regular Prelacy in a Religion is necessary

Quaestio II: How the Prelate of a Religion is to be chosen

Quaestio III: How many Prelates there are in one religion, and what order among them

Quaestio IV: Whether it befits a Regular Prelate to remain long in the same office

Quaestio V: Whether a religious Prelate has the power of coercing subjects with penalties, both spiritual and corporal

Quaestio VI: What solemnities a Regular Prelate, acting in judgment, is bound to observe

Quaestio VII: Whether appeal can be made from a Prelate, or Regular Judge

Quaestio VIII: Who is the Judge from Whom, and to Whom appeal is made

Quaestio IX: Whether a Regular Prelate can dispense with his subject, Who, and in what

Quaestio X: What power a Regular Prelate has to absolve, both from sins, and from penalties

Quaestio XI: Whether a Regular Prelate has the Power of administering temporal things, and what

Quaestio XII: Whether, and What, Regular Prelates can do concerning conferring Orders, and blessing things, or places

Disputatio IV: LAST. On the State of the Active, and Contemplative life

Quaestio I: Whether the Division of life into Active, and Contemplative is sufficient

Quaestio II: Which state is more excellent than the other: the state of the Active life, or conversely, the Contemplative

Quaestio III: Whether there is a Mixed Life resulting from the Active, and Contemplative, and which of these is more excellent

Quaestio IV: What are the chief exercises of the Active life

Quaestio V: On the chief Act of the Contemplative life, and how this act differs from Cogitation, Meditation, Speculation, and Intuitive vision

Quaestio VI: Whether Contemplation has certain degrees of its perfection, how many, and which

↑ Top of work