Palladium theologicum, Tomus quintus: De virtutibus
Gaudenzio da Brescia (1612–1672)
Reuerendi patris Gaudentij Bontempi, ... Palladium theologicum, seu Tota theologia scholastica in septem tomos distributa. Ad intimam mentem d. Bonauenturae seraphici doctoris ... Tomus quintus, De virtutibus
First published 1676
Bontempi's Palladium theologicum (Lyon 1676) is a complete scholastic theology composed ad mentem D. Bonaventurae, arranged in seven tractatus on the order of the Secunda secundae. This fifth volume, De virtutibus, treats the theological virtues (faith, hope, charity, with their gifts, beatitudes and fruits), the cardinal virtues and their opposite vices, and the states and offices of men (religious and prelates, bishops, princes), including the extensive disputations on contracts, religion, vows, fortitude, temperance and the judicial process. It is a significant example of the Bonaventurian scholastic school and a counterpart to the Thomist manuals of the period.
Tractatus I: PRIMUS DE VIRTUTIBUS THEOLOGICIS
Proemium I: Prooemium
Disputatio I: ON FAITH
Quaestio I: What FAITH signifies, and what it is
Quaestio II: What the object of FAITH is
Quaestio III: Whether the object of FAITH is something complex
Quaestio IV: Whether the object of FAITH can be false
Quaestio V: Whether the object of FAITH can be evident scientifically
Quaestio VI: Whether FAITH is concerned with those things which are seen by vision on the way
Quaestio VII: Whether the articles of FAITH are evidently credible
Quaestio VIII: Whether the things to be believed are rightly arranged according to the articles
Quaestio IX: Whether the articles of FAITH have grown over the course of time
Quaestio X: Whether FAITH has grown as regards light
Quaestio XI: Whether Faith has grown in certitude
Quaestio XII: Whether the articles of Faith are to be expounded by some authority which is an infallible teacher, and what it is
Quaestio XIII: What are the marks of the true Church, in which the authority of expounding FAITH resides
Quaestio XIV: What must be believed by the necessity of means
Quaestio XV: What things are to be believed by the necessity of precept
Quaestio XVI: Whether we are bound to confess FAITH, and when
Quaestio XVII: Whether it is lawful to dispute about FAITH, and when
Quaestio XVIII: Whether Faith resides in the Intellect
Quaestio XIX: Whether Faith is perfected by Charity, as by its form
Quaestio XX: Whether it is certain that FAITH remains without CHARITY
Quaestio XXI: Whether, and how, FAITH is a VIRTUE
Quaestio XXII: Whether FAITH is ONE VIRTUE
Quaestio XXIII: Whether FAITH is the first of the Virtues
Quaestio XXIV: Whether FAITH is more certain than any science, or than any intellectual habit
Quaestio XXV: Whether one can know with certainty that he has FAITH
Quaestio XXVI: In whom FAITH is found
Quaestio XXVII: Whether FAITH is a substantial Gift of GOD
Quaestio XXVIII: Whether the difference between FAITH and other acts, natural as opposed to supernatural moral acts, always arises from the object
Quaestio XXIX: On the effects of FAITH
Quaestio XXX: On the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING
Dubitatio I: Whether UNDERSTANDING is a gift of the Holy Ghost
Dubitatio II: Whether the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING can coexist with FAITH
Dubitatio III: Whether the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING consists in the contemplation of the Creator and of Creation
Dubitatio IV: Whether the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING is found in all who have grace, and whether in these alone
Dubitatio V: What is the necessity and utility of the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING
Dubitatio VI: Whether* **the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING** *corresponds to the sixth beatitude, namely, Blessed are the clean of heart, etc.
Dubitatio VII: Whether* **to the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING** *there corresponds, among the fruits of the Holy Ghost, Faith
Quaestio XXXI: On the Gift of Knowledge
Dubitatio I: Whether* **KNOWLEDGE** *is a gift of the Holy Ghost
Dubitatio II: Whether knowledge is concerned with Divine things
Dubitatio III: Whether the gift of knowledge is speculative
Dubitatio IV: Whether the third Beatitude corresponds to the Gift of Knowledge: Blessed are they that mourn, etc.
Disputatio II: On Unbelief
Quaestio I: What UNBELIEF is, and what kind of sin it is
Quaestio II: Whether all the works of unbelievers are sins
Quaestio III: Whether unbelievers can be compelled to hear FAITH
Quaestio IV: Whether unbelievers can be compelled to embrace our FAITH, when it has been sufficiently set forth
Quaestio V: Whether unbaptized unbelievers can be compelled to abandon errors or rites contrary to natural reason
Quaestio VI: Whether the rites of unbelievers are to be permitted
Quaestio VII: Whether it is lawful to make agreements with unbelievers about the toleration of their rites
Quaestio VIII: Whether unbaptized unbelievers can retain power over the Faithful, and whether they can be deprived of it
Disputatio III: On Heresy
Quaestio I: What HERESY is
Quaestio II: Whether one who doubts about the articles of FAITH is a heretic
Quaestio III: Whether one who gives merely opinionative assent to an article of FAITH is a heretic
Quaestio IV: Whether, and what, Ignorance excuses from Heresy
Quaestio V: What pertinacity is required for HERESY
Quaestio VI: Whether, for one to be deemed a Heretic, it is necessary that he have been baptized and a believer
Quaestio VII: Whether the Church can compel heretics to receive the Catholic FAITH
Quaestio VIII: On the other means the Church uses against heretics, by forbidding their Books
Quaestio IX: Whether we are bound to avoid the conversation of heretics
Quaestio X: What excommunication is inflicted upon heretics
Quaestio XI: On the other spiritual punishments of heretics
Quaestio XII: On the temporal punishments of Heretics
Disputatio IV: On Hope
Quaestio I: What HOPE is
Quaestio II: What the material object of HOPE is
Question III
Quaestio IV: Whether a certain object is set forth for HOPE, and is hoped for
Quaestio V: Whether Hope is a Virtue
Quaestio VI: Whether HOPE is a Theological Virtue
Quaestio VII: Whether HOPE is at times formless
Quaestio VIII: Whether HOPE arises from merits
Quaestio IX: Whether Hope precedes Charity
Quaestio X: What the proximate subject of HOPE is
Quaestio XI: Whether HOPE remains in the Blessed
Quaestio XII: Whether there is a precept of hoping in GOD
Dubitatio I: UNICA. Would this precept bind one to whom certain damnation had been revealed
Disputatio V: On the Gift of Fear
Quaestio I: Whether FEAR is a Habit distinct from HOPE
Quaestio II: What the object of FEAR is
Quaestio III: Whether worldly Fear is always evil
Quaestio IV: Whether servile Fear is honorable, and a Gift of God
Quaestio V: Whether servile Fear is cast out when grace comes
Quaestio VI: Whether Initial and Filial Fear differ specifically
Quaestio VII: Whether, as Charity grows, Fear diminishes
Quaestio VIII: Whether gratuitous Fear remains in the fatherland
Quaestio IX: Whether Poverty of Spirit corresponds to the GIFT OF FEAR
Quaestio X: On the Effects, and the precept, of the FEAR OF GOD
Disputatio VI: On Despair
Quaestio I: UNICA. Of what power DESPAIR is an act, and what sin it is
Disputatio VII: On Presumption
Quaestio I: What PRESUMPTION is, and what kind of sin
Disputatio VIII: On Charity
Quaestio I: What CHARITY is
Quaestio II: What the object of Charity is
Quaestio III: Whether Charity is properly the friendship of God
Quaestio IV: Whether Charity is a created Habit
Quaestio V: Whether Charity is one special Virtue
Quaestio VI: Whether Charity is of a most special species
Quaestio VII: Whether Charity is the most excellent of the virtues
Quaestio VIII: Whether Charity is the Form of the Virtues
Quaestio IX: Whether besides infused Charity there is another charity, acquired by our own acts
Quaestio X: Whether Charity can be formless
Quaestio XI: Whether CHARITY increases, and how
Quaestio XII: Whether, and how, CHARITY in this life is perfect
Quaestio XIII: Whether Charity can be lost, and how
Quaestio XIV: What is the proximate subject of Charity
Quaestio XV: Whether God alone is to be loved out of Charity, or the neighbor also
Quaestio XVI: Whether Charity is to be loved out of Charity
Quaestio XVII: Whether all gratuitous gifts are to be loved out of CHARITY
Quaestio XVIII: Whether irrational creatures are to be loved out of CHARITY
Quaestio XIX: Whether a man ought to love himself out of CHARITY
Quaestio XX: Whether a man ought to love his own body out of Charity
Quaestio XXI: Whether sinners are to be loved out of Charity
Quaestio XXII: Whether it is necessary to love enemies out of CHARITY
Quaestio XXIII: Whether we are bound to show the effects of CHARITY toward enemies, and which
Quaestio XXIV: Whether Angels are to be loved out of CHARITY
Quaestio XXV: Whether Demons, and the Damned, are to be loved out of CHARITY
Quaestio XXVI: Whether it is fitting that four things to be loved out of CHARITY are enumerated
Quaestio XXVII: Whether God, and the neighbor, are loved with the same habit of CHARITY
Quaestio XXVIII: Whether there is order in CHARITY
Quaestio XXIX: Whether GOD is to be loved more than the neighbor
Quaestio XXX: Whether a man ought out of CHARITY to love God more than himself
Quaestio XXXI: Whether Nature inclines more to loving GOD than to loving ourselves
Quaestio XXXII: Whether a man ought to love himself more than his neighbor
Quaestio XXXIII: Whether the eternal salvation of the neighbor is to be loved more than our own life
Quaestio XXXIV: Whether one neighbor is to be loved more than another
Quaestio XXXV: Whether a Son is to be loved more than a Father
Quaestio XXXVI: Whether a man ought out of CHARITY to love his Mother more than his Father
Quaestio XXXVII: Whether a man ought to love his spouse more than his parents, and Children
Quaestio XXXVIII: Whether the order of CHARITY is considered in the affection, and in the effect
Quaestio XXXIX: Whether the order of CHARITY remains in heaven
Quaestio XL: Whether it is more proper to Charity to love than to be loved
Quaestio XLI: Whether Love is the same as Benevolence
Quaestio XLII: Whether, and whether he can, GOD must be loved in the way with the whole heart, the whole soul, the whole mind, and all one's strength
Quaestio XLIII: Whether some measure is to be kept in Divine love
Quaestio XLIV: Whether Charity ought to be enlarged in heaven
Quaestio XLV: Whether it is more meritorious to love an enemy than a friend
Quaestio XLVI: Whether a man, constituted in however small CHARITY, is bound to undergo death for CHRIST
Quaestio XLVII: Whether those having perfect CHARITY are bound to fulfill the things that are of perfection
Quaestio XLVIII: How, and when, the precept of the love of GOD binds
Quaestio XLIX: Whether a man is bound at the first instant of the use of reason to be converted to GOD
Quaestio L: How, and when, the precept of the love of the neighbor binds
Disputatio IX: On the internal effects of Charity, JOY, PEACE, and MERCY
§ I: On Joy
Quaestio I: Whether JOY is an Effect of Charity, and of what kind
Quaestio II: Whether JOY is a virtue
§ II: On Peace
Quaestio I: UNICA. What PEACE is
§ III: On Mercy
Quaestio I: What MERCY is
Quaestio II: Which, and what kind of Virtue, MERCY is
Disputatio X: On the external effects of Charity
§ I: De Beneficentia
Quaestio I: UNICA. What BENEFICENCE is
§ II: On Almsgiving
Quaestio I: Whether to give ALMS is an act of Charity
Quaestio II: Whether the kinds of ALMS are fittingly distinguished
Quaestio III: Whether ALMS is a matter of precept
Quaestio IV: Whether it is a precept, in common necessities, to give superfluities to the poor
Quaestio V: Whether anyone is bound at some time to give alms from things necessary to his state, apart from the extreme necessity of the neighbor
Quaestio VI: Whether alms is owed out of justice to one in extreme need
Quaestio VII: Whether Alms ought to be given from justly possessed goods
§ III: On Fraternal Correction
Quaestio I: Whether FRATERNAL CORRECTION is a matter of precept
Quaestio II: Whether the order of fraternal correction, even in Religious Orders, is a matter of precept, so that the correction first be made in secret
Disputatio XI: On Hatred
Quaestio I: What the object of HATRED is, and what it is
Quaestio II: What, and what kind of sin, hatred is
Disputatio XII: On Sloth
Quaestio I: What ACEDIA is, and what its object is
Disputatio XIII: On Envy
Quaestio I: What ENVY is, and what its object is
Quaestio II: How perverse ENVY is
Disputatio XIV: On Discord, and Contention
Quaestio I: What DISCORD is, and what kind of sin
Quaestio II: What kind, and how great, a sin Contention is
Disputatio XV: On Schism
Quaestio I: What kind of sin SCHISM is
Quaestio II: How great a sin SCHISM is
Quaestio III: What punishments are owed to SCHISMATICS
Disputatio XVI: DE BELLO
Quaestio I: Whether any war can be just
Quaestio II: What conditions are required for a just war
Quaestio III: By whom BELLUM (war) may be waged
Disputatio XVII: On Quarreling, and Sedition
Quaestio I: What RIXA (quarreling) is, and what kind of sin
Quaestio II: What sedition is
Disputatio XVIII: On Scandal
Quaestio I: What, and of how many kinds, SCANDAL is
Quaestio II: Whether SCANDAL is a special sin
Quaestio III: What is to be done, and what omitted, to avoid scandal
Quaestio IV: Whether it is lawful to persuade one resolved upon a great evil into a lesser evil
Disputatio XIX: On the Gift of Wisdom
Quaestio I: What kind of gift WISDOM is
Quaestio II: What is the usefulness, and necessity, of this Gift
Quaestio III: By what means is the GIFT OF WISDOM obtained from God
Quaestio IV: On the illumination that Wisdom brings
Quaestio V: On the spiritual delights of Wisdom
Quaestio VI: How Folly is opposed to Wisdom
Quaestio VII: Whether the seventh Beatitude corresponds to the gift of Wisdom
Disputatio XX: On Prudence
Quaestio I: What PRUDENCE is
Quaestio II: Whether PRUDENCE is a virtue
Quaestio III: Which are the offices of PRUDENCE
Quaestio IV: Who are the participants in PRUDENCE
Quaestio V: How Prudence is acquired, and lost
Quaestio VI: On the parts of the Virtue of PRUDENCE
Quaestio VII: How certain rules of prudence, applicable to the Monastic and Political state, are drawn from the Angelic Hierarchy
§ I: On the Prudence that men bound by solemn vows claim for themselves from the first choir of Angels
§ II: On the Governance of the Prelates of the Church, from the Second Hierarchy of the First Choir, likened to the Dominations
§ III: On the Prudence of Judges, compared with the Virtues, from the second order of the second Hierarchy
§ IV: On the governance of Princes, and similar Powers
§ V: On the Prudence of individuals, from the lowest Hierarchy
Quaestio I: Whether there is one PRUDENCE for all the moral virtues
Disputatio XXI: On the Gift of Counsel
Quaestio I: What the gift of COUNSEL is, and what its office is
Quaestio II: How the GIFT OF COUNSEL orders the mind
Quaestio III: Whether the Gift of COUNSEL remains in heaven
Quaestio IV: Whether the fifth Beatitude corresponds to the Gift of Counsel
Disputatio XXII: On the Vices contrary to Prudence
Quaestio I: On PRECIPITATION
Quaestio II: On INCONSIDERATENESS
Quaestio III: On INCONSTANCY
Quaestio IV: On Negligence
Quaestio V: On the prudence of the flesh
Quaestio VI: On ASTUTENESS
Quaestio VII: On CRAFT (dolus)
Quaestio VIII: On FRAUD
Quaestio IX: On solicitude for temporal things
Quaestio X: On solicitude for the Future
Quaestio XI: On the precepts of PRUDENCE
Disputatio XXIII: On Justice
Quaestio I: Whether Ius (right) is the object of JUSTICE
Quaestio II: What JUSTICE is
Quaestio III: Whether JUSTICE is a special virtue
JUSTICE, according to the abstract notion, inasmuch as it perfects in order to another, is twofold. So Aristotle 5. Eth. cap. 1. et 2. One is particular, which perfects man in order to another particular person, for instance a seller in order to a buyer. The other perfects man in order to another, not per se first, as the particular does, but in order to that other as he is a part of the community, and it is called Legal; for the Laws prescribe those things which pertain to the common good.
JUSTICE indeed particular is, without controversy, a special virtue, as D. Thom. says art. 7. D. Bonav. in 3. dist. 33. quaest. 2.
It is PROVED by D. Bonau. ad caput citatum Sapientiae, and in Diaeta salutis, tit. 5. cap. 8. from those words: For he teaches Sobriety, and Prudence, and Virtue, and Justice, as I explained quaest. 1. Then in that Commentary he brings forward Prov. 8. Mine is Equity, mine is Prudence, mine is Fortitude.
THEN it is proved by S. Doct. in Pharetra, lib. 2. cap. 42. from the Fathers related above.
It is PROVED thirdly by the arguments of D. Bonav. in 3. distinct. 33. quaest. 2. et dub. 1. and other places cited above.
The FIRST argument is taken from the potency which it perfects; for Prudence directs the rational, Temperance the concupiscible, Fortitude the irascible; but Justice all of them, to render what is equal. And in Diaeta, tit. 5. cap. 31. he brings forward on this point an elegant similitude. For just as God, in the Megacosm of the world, ordered all things in number, weight, and measure, as is said Sap. 11., so Justice in this Microcosm orders all things in number, weight, and measure, in commutations and distributions. Whence with a graceful figure he adorns it with the name of a GODDESS, to whom David said Psalm. 4. Sacrifice the sacrifice of justice, that is, perform just acts, as Valentia also expounds punct. 1. et ad cap. 1. Sap. on those words: Love justice, you who judge the earth, he says from D. Anselmo: Love justice, that you may be conformed to God, because the Lord is just, and has loved justices. Love (says S. Bonav.) justice uncreated, which is the rectitude of the divine will; and created, which is the rectitude of the human will. Thus he expounds that: Blessed are they who hunger and thirst for justice, with D. Ambrosio lib. 5. in Lucam, where he numbers Justice with the other Cardinals. So also D. August. lib. de moribus Ecclesiae, cap. 15. apud D. Bonau. in Centiloq. in the place cited.
The SECOND argument of S. Doct. is taken from the acts, by which different habits are recognized as different; for the act of Justice is, as I said quaest. 1., to render to each his right, or the equal and the due, in the ways expressed quaest. 2. But this does not belong to the other virtues.
The THIRD argument of S. Doct. is taken from the object; for acts are distinguished by it, as habits by acts. That is a special virtue which is concerned with an object peculiarly laudable and difficult, as is confessed among all: Such is particular Justice, since it is concerned with the equal due to another, about which the other virtues are not concerned: Therefore. Valentia also uses this argument puncto 2.
The FOURTH argument of S. Doct. is taken from the contrary. For, if anyone behaves unjustly toward another particular person, e. g. by snatching something from him, etc., he commits a special vice, for which he deserves special blame, even if he commits it from no other vice: Therefore to behave rightly and equally toward another is a special virtue. This is the argument of Aristotle 5. Eth. cap. 2. which Valentia loc. cit. follows.
The FIFTH argument of D. Bonav. is taken from the means of the virtues; for since these virtues consist in a mean, that virtue will be special which has a special mean: Such is Justice, which stands between too much, exceeding; and too little, detracting from the equal and the due. But the other moral virtues do not keep this mean, as all acknowledge.
As FOR legal Justice, it is certain that it is a general virtue, inasmuch as it is exercised in every matter of the moral virtues. For just as the Laws prescribe in every matter those things which conduce to the common good, as Aristotle teaches 5. Eth. cap. 1., so legal Justice perfects man, that he may behave rightly and justly toward the community in every matter of the moral virtues.
It is, however, CONTROVERTED: Whether Legal Justice is general not only in matter, but also in its formal notion.
BURIDANUS 5. Eth. quaest. 4. thinks that Legal Justice is any virtue whatever, as it operates for the common good; and thus Temperance, as it directs toward health on account of one's own advantage, is called temperance, but as it directs toward the common good of the Republic it is called Potency; inasmuch as it can serve the Republic by fighting, etc., it is Justice.
Yet the contrary opinion is that of S. Bonau. above, D. Thom. art. 6. whom Valentia follows punct. 2. Soto lib. 3. de Iustitia, quaest. 2. art. 5. and others commonly, apud Mastrium in 3. disp. 7. num. 189.
I ASSERT, with this opinion, that legal Justice is not a general virtue.
It is PROVED first from Aristotle 5. Eth. cap. 1. where he gives it special Encomia, by which a special virtue is confirmed; S. Doct. collected those elogia in Diaeta, titulo 5. cap. ultimo. Thus he proclaims it a perfect and most excellent virtue, and compares it to a star.
So also S. Doct. compares it to a straight way, which inclines neither to the right nor to the left, and applies to it that Psalm. 106. He led them forth into the right way, namely, that they might attain to the eternal prize.
THEN he compares it to the straight Rule, which is the measure of things: For as we measure all things by a rule, and divide all things equally, so also Justice. And as the Astronomical rule measures by the line of Fiduciae the altitude of the pole above the place of habitation, the Climate, etc., so also Justice measures the entire state of the land, of the city, that the due may be rendered to all.
THIRDLY he compares it to a straight Line. For as the straight line is the most beautiful of lines, as the Philosopher says, cited quaest. 1.: so also the rectitude of Justice makes man most beautiful in intention and conversation. As also the stature of the human body is most beautiful, because erect toward heaven. So the stature of the heart is most lovely, when through Justice it is raised up to God. Whence Cant. 7. Thy stature is like to a palm tree.
THEN he compares it to a Gem, set in gold. The four Cardinal virtues, he says, are gems in the golden Diadem. In the anterior part, or on the forehead, is Prudence, whose it is to see not only present things but also future ones. On the right is Temperance, because this makes man just in the right hand of prosperity; Fortitude on the left of adversity. But Justice in the posterior part, as the Bishop in procession, as the King at the end of the battle line, as the Pilot at the stern of the ship, as the just Sentence is pronounced at the end of the cause, and as at the end of the contest the triumphal Crown is given to the victor. Whence the Crown is named from it as from its principal part. So the Apostle prima Timot. 4. There is laid up for me a crown of justice. The Goldsmith, in whose Forge this precious crown is wrought, is Wisdom, of which Sap. 8. Then he compares it to the polar Star, and to God, as I showed above. Behold S. Doctor speaking most excellently.
It is PROVED secondly by the argument of D. Bonau. in almost all the places cited, because in the act of Legal Justice there is special praise and difficulty. Therefore. The consequence is proved from Aristotle 2. Eth. cap. 6. and 7. The antecedent is Aristotle 5. Eth. cap. 1. and 3. Politic. cap. 3.
Here the arguments first laid down can also be applied.
YOU OBJECT with Buridanus. All the Virtues operate according to rectitude, and in order to the public good; otherwise the virtues could be not right.
Valentia answers from D. Bonavent. in 3. dist. 33. quaest. 2. ad 2. et 4. that all the virtues indeed have their own proper rectitude and mediocrity, declining from the extremes; nevertheless each has its own singular rectitude, from which Justice makes the right according to all circumstances, inasmuch as it is ordered to another, and this belongs to Justice, not to the other virtues.