Palladium theologicum, Tomus quintus: De virtutibus
Gaudenzio da Brescia (1612–1672)
Reuerendi patris Gaudentij Bontempi, ... Palladium theologicum, seu Tota theologia scholastica in septem tomos distributa. Ad intimam mentem d. Bonauenturae seraphici doctoris ... Tomus quintus, De virtutibus
First published 1676
Bontempi's Palladium theologicum (Lyon 1676) is a complete scholastic theology composed ad mentem D. Bonaventurae, arranged in seven tractatus on the order of the Secunda secundae. This fifth volume, De virtutibus, treats the theological virtues (faith, hope, charity, with their gifts, beatitudes and fruits), the cardinal virtues and their opposite vices, and the states and offices of men (religious and prelates, bishops, princes), including the extensive disputations on contracts, religion, vows, fortitude, temperance and the judicial process. It is a significant example of the Bonaventurian scholastic school and a counterpart to the Thomist manuals of the period.
Tractatus I: PRIMUS DE VIRTUTIBUS THEOLOGICIS
Proemium I: Prooemium
Disputatio I: ON FAITH
Quaestio I: What FAITH signifies, and what it is
Quaestio II: What the object of FAITH is
Quaestio III: Whether the object of FAITH is something complex
Quaestio IV: Whether the object of FAITH can be false
Quaestio V: Whether the object of FAITH can be evident scientifically
Quaestio VI: Whether FAITH is concerned with those things which are seen by vision on the way
Quaestio VII: Whether the articles of FAITH are evidently credible
Quaestio VIII: Whether the things to be believed are rightly arranged according to the articles
Quaestio IX: Whether the articles of FAITH have grown over the course of time
Quaestio X: Whether FAITH has grown as regards light
Quaestio XI: Whether Faith has grown in certitude
Quaestio XII: Whether the articles of Faith are to be expounded by some authority which is an infallible teacher, and what it is
Quaestio XIII: What are the marks of the true Church, in which the authority of expounding FAITH resides
Quaestio XIV: What must be believed by the necessity of means
Quaestio XV: What things are to be believed by the necessity of precept
Quaestio XVI: Whether we are bound to confess FAITH, and when
Quaestio XVII: Whether it is lawful to dispute about FAITH, and when
Quaestio XVIII: Whether Faith resides in the Intellect
Quaestio XIX: Whether Faith is perfected by Charity, as by its form
Quaestio XX: Whether it is certain that FAITH remains without CHARITY
Quaestio XXI: Whether, and how, FAITH is a VIRTUE
Quaestio XXII: Whether FAITH is ONE VIRTUE
Quaestio XXIII: Whether FAITH is the first of the Virtues
Quaestio XXIV: Whether FAITH is more certain than any science, or than any intellectual habit
Quaestio XXV: Whether one can know with certainty that he has FAITH
Quaestio XXVI: In whom FAITH is found
Quaestio XXVII: Whether FAITH is a substantial Gift of GOD
Quaestio XXVIII: Whether the difference between FAITH and other acts, natural as opposed to supernatural moral acts, always arises from the object
Quaestio XXIX: On the effects of FAITH
Quaestio XXX: On the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING
Dubitatio I: Whether UNDERSTANDING is a gift of the Holy Ghost
Dubitatio II: Whether the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING can coexist with FAITH
Dubitatio III: Whether the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING consists in the contemplation of the Creator and of Creation
Dubitatio IV: Whether the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING is found in all who have grace, and whether in these alone
Dubitatio V: What is the necessity and utility of the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING
Dubitatio VI: Whether* **the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING** *corresponds to the sixth beatitude, namely, Blessed are the clean of heart, etc.
Dubitatio VII: Whether* **to the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING** *there corresponds, among the fruits of the Holy Ghost, Faith
Quaestio XXXI: On the Gift of Knowledge
Dubitatio I: Whether* **KNOWLEDGE** *is a gift of the Holy Ghost
Dubitatio II: Whether knowledge is concerned with Divine things
Dubitatio III: Whether the gift of knowledge is speculative
Dubitatio IV: Whether the third Beatitude corresponds to the Gift of Knowledge: Blessed are they that mourn, etc.
Disputatio II: On Unbelief
Quaestio I: What UNBELIEF is, and what kind of sin it is
Quaestio II: Whether all the works of unbelievers are sins
Quaestio III: Whether unbelievers can be compelled to hear FAITH
Quaestio IV: Whether unbelievers can be compelled to embrace our FAITH, when it has been sufficiently set forth
Quaestio V: Whether unbaptized unbelievers can be compelled to abandon errors or rites contrary to natural reason
Quaestio VI: Whether the rites of unbelievers are to be permitted
Quaestio VII: Whether it is lawful to make agreements with unbelievers about the toleration of their rites
Quaestio VIII: Whether unbaptized unbelievers can retain power over the Faithful, and whether they can be deprived of it
Disputatio III: On Heresy
Quaestio I: What HERESY is
Quaestio II: Whether one who doubts about the articles of FAITH is a heretic
Quaestio III: Whether one who gives merely opinionative assent to an article of FAITH is a heretic
Quaestio IV: Whether, and what, Ignorance excuses from Heresy
Quaestio V: What pertinacity is required for HERESY
Quaestio VI: Whether, for one to be deemed a Heretic, it is necessary that he have been baptized and a believer
Quaestio VII: Whether the Church can compel heretics to receive the Catholic FAITH
Quaestio VIII: On the other means the Church uses against heretics, by forbidding their Books
Quaestio IX: Whether we are bound to avoid the conversation of heretics
Quaestio X: What excommunication is inflicted upon heretics
Quaestio XI: On the other spiritual punishments of heretics
Quaestio XII: On the temporal punishments of Heretics
Disputatio IV: On Hope
Quaestio I: What HOPE is
Quaestio II: What the material object of HOPE is
Question III
Quaestio IV: Whether a certain object is set forth for HOPE, and is hoped for
Quaestio V: Whether Hope is a Virtue
Quaestio VI: Whether HOPE is a Theological Virtue
Quaestio VII: Whether HOPE is at times formless
Quaestio VIII: Whether HOPE arises from merits
Quaestio IX: Whether Hope precedes Charity
Quaestio X: What the proximate subject of HOPE is
Quaestio XI: Whether HOPE remains in the Blessed
Quaestio XII: Whether there is a precept of hoping in GOD
Dubitatio I: UNICA. Would this precept bind one to whom certain damnation had been revealed
Disputatio V: On the Gift of Fear
Quaestio I: Whether FEAR is a Habit distinct from HOPE
Quaestio II: What the object of FEAR is
Quaestio III: Whether worldly Fear is always evil
Quaestio IV: Whether servile Fear is honorable, and a Gift of God
Quaestio V: Whether servile Fear is cast out when grace comes
Quaestio VI: Whether Initial and Filial Fear differ specifically
Quaestio VII: Whether, as Charity grows, Fear diminishes
Quaestio VIII: Whether gratuitous Fear remains in the fatherland
Quaestio IX: Whether Poverty of Spirit corresponds to the GIFT OF FEAR
Quaestio X: On the Effects, and the precept, of the FEAR OF GOD
Disputatio VI: On Despair
Quaestio I: UNICA. Of what power DESPAIR is an act, and what sin it is
Disputatio VII: On Presumption
Quaestio I: What PRESUMPTION is, and what kind of sin
Disputatio VIII: On Charity
Quaestio I: What CHARITY is
Quaestio II: What the object of Charity is
Quaestio III: Whether Charity is properly the friendship of God
Quaestio IV: Whether Charity is a created Habit
Quaestio V: Whether Charity is one special Virtue
Quaestio VI: Whether Charity is of a most special species
Quaestio VII: Whether Charity is the most excellent of the virtues
Quaestio VIII: Whether Charity is the Form of the Virtues
Quaestio IX: Whether besides infused Charity there is another charity, acquired by our own acts
Quaestio X: Whether Charity can be formless
Quaestio XI: Whether CHARITY increases, and how
Quaestio XII: Whether, and how, CHARITY in this life is perfect
Quaestio XIII: Whether Charity can be lost, and how
Quaestio XIV: What is the proximate subject of Charity
Quaestio XV: Whether God alone is to be loved out of Charity, or the neighbor also
Quaestio XVI: Whether Charity is to be loved out of Charity
Quaestio XVII: Whether all gratuitous gifts are to be loved out of CHARITY
Quaestio XVIII: Whether irrational creatures are to be loved out of CHARITY
Quaestio XIX: Whether a man ought to love himself out of CHARITY
Quaestio XX: Whether a man ought to love his own body out of Charity
Quaestio XXI: Whether sinners are to be loved out of Charity
Quaestio XXII: Whether it is necessary to love enemies out of CHARITY
Quaestio XXIII: Whether we are bound to show the effects of CHARITY toward enemies, and which
Quaestio XXIV: Whether Angels are to be loved out of CHARITY
Quaestio XXV: Whether Demons, and the Damned, are to be loved out of CHARITY
Quaestio XXVI: Whether it is fitting that four things to be loved out of CHARITY are enumerated
Quaestio XXVII: Whether God, and the neighbor, are loved with the same habit of CHARITY
Quaestio XXVIII: Whether there is order in CHARITY
Quaestio XXIX: Whether GOD is to be loved more than the neighbor
Quaestio XXX: Whether a man ought out of CHARITY to love God more than himself
Quaestio XXXI: Whether Nature inclines more to loving GOD than to loving ourselves
Quaestio XXXII: Whether a man ought to love himself more than his neighbor
Quaestio XXXIII: Whether the eternal salvation of the neighbor is to be loved more than our own life
Quaestio XXXIV: Whether one neighbor is to be loved more than another
Quaestio XXXV: Whether a Son is to be loved more than a Father
Quaestio XXXVI: Whether a man ought out of CHARITY to love his Mother more than his Father
Quaestio XXXVII: Whether a man ought to love his spouse more than his parents, and Children
Quaestio XXXVIII: Whether the order of CHARITY is considered in the affection, and in the effect
Quaestio XXXIX: Whether the order of CHARITY remains in heaven
Quaestio XL: Whether it is more proper to Charity to love than to be loved
Quaestio XLI: Whether Love is the same as Benevolence
Quaestio XLII: Whether, and whether he can, GOD must be loved in the way with the whole heart, the whole soul, the whole mind, and all one's strength
Quaestio XLIII: Whether some measure is to be kept in Divine love
Quaestio XLIV: Whether Charity ought to be enlarged in heaven
Quaestio XLV: Whether it is more meritorious to love an enemy than a friend
Quaestio XLVI: Whether a man, constituted in however small CHARITY, is bound to undergo death for CHRIST
Quaestio XLVII: Whether those having perfect CHARITY are bound to fulfill the things that are of perfection
Quaestio XLVIII: How, and when, the precept of the love of GOD binds
Quaestio XLIX: Whether a man is bound at the first instant of the use of reason to be converted to GOD
Quaestio L: How, and when, the precept of the love of the neighbor binds
Disputatio IX: On the internal effects of Charity, JOY, PEACE, and MERCY
§ I: On Joy
Quaestio I: Whether JOY is an Effect of Charity, and of what kind
Quaestio II: Whether JOY is a virtue
§ II: On Peace
Quaestio I: UNICA. What PEACE is
§ III: On Mercy
Quaestio I: What MERCY is
Quaestio II: Which, and what kind of Virtue, MERCY is
Disputatio X: On the external effects of Charity
§ I: De Beneficentia
Quaestio I: UNICA. What BENEFICENCE is
§ II: On Almsgiving
Quaestio I: Whether to give ALMS is an act of Charity
Quaestio II: Whether the kinds of ALMS are fittingly distinguished
Quaestio III: Whether ALMS is a matter of precept
Quaestio IV: Whether it is a precept, in common necessities, to give superfluities to the poor
Quaestio V: Whether anyone is bound at some time to give alms from things necessary to his state, apart from the extreme necessity of the neighbor
Quaestio VI: Whether alms is owed out of justice to one in extreme need
Quaestio VII: Whether Alms ought to be given from justly possessed goods
§ III: On Fraternal Correction
Quaestio I: Whether FRATERNAL CORRECTION is a matter of precept
Quaestio II: Whether the order of fraternal correction, even in Religious Orders, is a matter of precept, so that the correction first be made in secret
Disputatio XI: On Hatred
Quaestio I: What the object of HATRED is, and what it is
Quaestio II: What, and what kind of sin, hatred is
Disputatio XII: On Sloth
Quaestio I: What ACEDIA is, and what its object is
Disputatio XIII: On Envy
Quaestio I: What ENVY is, and what its object is
Quaestio II: How perverse ENVY is
Disputatio XIV: On Discord, and Contention
Quaestio I: What DISCORD is, and what kind of sin
Quaestio II: What kind, and how great, a sin Contention is
Disputatio XV: On Schism
Quaestio I: What kind of sin SCHISM is
Quaestio II: How great a sin SCHISM is
Quaestio III: What punishments are owed to SCHISMATICS
Disputatio XVI: DE BELLO
Quaestio I: Whether any war can be just
Quaestio II: What conditions are required for a just war
Quaestio III: By whom BELLUM (war) may be waged
Disputatio XVII: On Quarreling, and Sedition
Quaestio I: What RIXA (quarreling) is, and what kind of sin
Quaestio II: What sedition is
Disputatio XVIII: On Scandal
Quaestio I: What, and of how many kinds, SCANDAL is
Quaestio II: Whether SCANDAL is a special sin
Quaestio III: What is to be done, and what omitted, to avoid scandal
Quaestio IV: Whether it is lawful to persuade one resolved upon a great evil into a lesser evil
Disputatio XIX: On the Gift of Wisdom
Quaestio I: What kind of gift WISDOM is
Quaestio II: What is the usefulness, and necessity, of this Gift
Quaestio III: By what means is the GIFT OF WISDOM obtained from God
Quaestio IV: On the illumination that Wisdom brings
Quaestio V: On the spiritual delights of Wisdom
Quaestio VI: How Folly is opposed to Wisdom
Quaestio VII: Whether the seventh Beatitude corresponds to the gift of Wisdom
Disputatio XX: On Prudence
Quaestio I: What PRUDENCE is
Quaestio II: Whether PRUDENCE is a virtue
Quaestio III: Which are the offices of PRUDENCE
Quaestio IV: Who are the participants in PRUDENCE
Quaestio V: How Prudence is acquired, and lost
Quaestio VI: On the parts of the Virtue of PRUDENCE
Quaestio VII: How certain rules of prudence, applicable to the Monastic and Political state, are drawn from the Angelic Hierarchy
§ I: On the Prudence that men bound by solemn vows claim for themselves from the first choir of Angels
§ II: On the Governance of the Prelates of the Church, from the Second Hierarchy of the First Choir, likened to the Dominations
The S. Doctor compares the Dominations to Pontiffs and other Prelates of the Church.
Now they are called Dominations because, as S. Isidorus says, Lib. VII. Ethymol. cap. V., dominating over the inferior Angels, they instruct and inform them how in the office of prelacy they ought to recall their subjects to the Deiform likeness, and, without tyranny, liberally to order the deeds of their subjects. Whence S. Dionysius, de coelesti Hierarchia, cap. VIII.: The naming of the Dominations declares an absolute and free Anagogy, bearing itself liberally without any tyrannical servitude, and removed from all ignominious subjection. As if to say: As by Anagogy, that is, by universal excellence over the other Angels, they are raised up without subjection; so by no tyranny are they inclined to the depression of others. Of whose domination is both liberal and severe: liberal in benignity; severe in power; and this properly befits Prelates, who singly dominate in spiritual things; as Priests and Bishops, who are accounted worthier than others in the spiritual office. Such is the word of the S. Doctor.
Therefore they are called Dominations, who preside purely in spiritual things; because true dominion is obtained, when vices are overcome, and virtuous works dominate in the kingdom of the soul, or of the Church. But evils cannot be extirpated, so that goods may effectively dominate, except through the ministry of prelates, to whom authority has been conferred from heaven, that through their office and the Ministries of the Sacraments vices may be done away, and morals corrected in men, and thus the minds of subjects be reformed by the discipline of morals to the Deiform likeness. And therefore in Prelates of souls is the authority of such a Domination left by the Lord, that, with them cooperating, the servitude of sin may be banished, and the true liberty of the Spirit may dominate through their ministry. Whence it is said Sap. IX. In thy wisdom thou hast constituted man, that he may have dominion over thy creature, which was made by thee, that he may dispose the circle of the earth in equity, and direction of heart, and justice.
Let them recognize therefore (says the S. Doctor) the Pontiffs of Christ and the Priests, that from the Dominator of the whole earth they have received supreme Dominion, and from the days of the ages utterly unheard of not only by men but by Angelic spirits, because, as Bernardus says in his sermone de coena Domini, it is nowhere read as attributed to Kings or Princes, to make the glorious and most holy body of Christ, offering it to God. This gift has been granted to Prelates not for extorting base gain, nor for boasting, or oppressing subjects; but rather for reducing subjects to the state of true liberty through the ministry of Priests; and this Zachar. VI. says: He shall sit, and shall rule, and shall be a priest upon his throne, and there shall be a counsel of peace between them, and the crowns shall be memorials in the temple of the Lord.
Therefore the Priests of Christ are so called, not that they should bear themselves as dominating in their chapters unto pride, but that they should show themselves in heart and deed a pattern to the flock, prima Petri V., and unto the likeness of the Angels promote their subjects by word and example.
Therefore the Prelates of the Church are compared to the Dominations. First, because, as these are subject to the dignity of no earthly domination, as S. Dionysius says, de coelesti Hierar. cap. VIII.: so Ecclesiastics have pre-eminence over Laymen, nor are they subjected to any of their laws pressing against Ecclesiastical immunity. Whence there is said to them the same Deuter. XV. Thou shalt have dominion over every nation, and none shall have dominion over thee.
Next, because, as the heavenly Dominations exercise no tyrannical or heavy power over the subject Angels, but simply condescend to them; so ought the life of clerics to be.
Thirdly, because, as the Dominations are called by S. Dionysius in the place cited onward and higher, because converted in their own order they convert other inferiors, and perfect in themselves they perfect and illuminate others; so those who preside should allure by word and example; and he who hears, let him say: Come, Apoc. in the last chapter; and let it be as Ecclesiasticus X.: Such as is the Lord, or ruler of the city, such are they that dwell in it.
Fourthly, because, as the Angelic Dominations are called Liberal with severity; so Ecclesiastical Prelates, liberal and benign toward the humble, severe toward the proud and rebellious, punishing them with censures. Thus the Apostle admonishes Bishops, Timotheum, and Titum, that they do so: Reprove, beseech, etc.
Fifthly, because, as the Angelic Dominations are set apart with a great dissimilitude of perfection, because nothing unseemly of divine likeness is found in them; so Ecclesiastics should have pre-eminence from sinners with a great disparity of life, lest there be said to them the word Rom. II. Thou that preachest that men should not steal, dost thou steal? Or that of Isaia VIII. Hear ye deceivers, who rule over my people.
Sixthly, because as the Dominations of the Angels are so called because they dominate most powerfully even over themselves, as S. Dionysius says loco cit., so those dominating in the Church ought to dominate their own passions, that even as Melchisedech, without father, without mother, without genealogy, they acknowledge not even their dear ones, where the duty of their office must be fulfilled.
Seventhly, because as the Angels are called Dominations because they hold a good and stable immutability of affection in God, so that nothing appearing to them may dominate, but they be perpetually converted to the true immutable Being: so also Ecclesiastics should so stand in God as not to be converted to vanities and follies, as Tobias says cap. IV. Never suffer pride to rule in thy sense.
Therefore thus the Ecclesiastics purge, illuminate, and perfect all inferiors, that they may not be purged by them, etc. For as the Spirit has pre-eminence over the body and excels it, so the Spiritual power over the corporal. Whence it rightly receives the name of Domination. Whence the Regal power is subject to the spiritual Domination. Therefore Petrus, prima cap. II. You are a Regal Priesthood, a holy nation. For the temporal kingdom, as a certain thing adjoined, is subject to the Priesthood in the new testament; albeit in the old testament the Priesthood of temporal promises, being but a figure, seems to be adjoined to the regal power, Exodi 19. a regal Priesthood, as the S. Doctor says with D. Hieronym., lib. 1. cont. Pelag., and epist. ad Dardan., August., quaest. 33. in Num., and lib. 19. cont. Faust. cap. 31. Although it is adjoined there also as adding the dignity and virtue necessary to the superior Order; for without Religion kingdoms fall. Hence 27. Num. God commands even the Prince Josue to depend on the Pontiff, and Lev. 4. a higher Sacrifice is exacted for the Priest than for the King: as seems to be Philo lib. de victoria, Theodoretus quaest. 1. in Levit., Procop. in cap. 4. Levit. But if it be objected that Abiathar the Pontiff was deposed by Salomon; say with S. Bonav., according to the former Doctrine, that the case is unlike: or that it was done by the word of the Lord, as is said 3. Reg. 2. See on this matter at large the Seraphic Doctor, cap. 1. de ecclesiast. Hierarchia, part. 2., near the end.
Now truly, that Pontiffs may be able to be free for God, and at the same time raise and reform the vast multitude of the people to the Deiform likeness, they ought to take others into a share of the solicitude. Therefore also Iethro advised Moses, Exodi 18.: The business is above thy strength; thou alone canst not sustain it, etc. Be thou to the people in those things that pertain to God, to refer what is said to him: and show thou to the people the ceremonies and the rite of worshipping God, and the way by which they must walk, and the work they must do. Provide therefore able men, and fearing God, in whom there is truth, and who hate avarice, and appoint of them Tribunes, who may judge the people at all times, and it shall be lighter for thee, the burden being divided among others: And such are the Decani, Praepositi, Archidiaconi, and Iudices, whether ordinary or delegated, who soothe lawsuits and strive to recall men to concord. And such are compared to the heavenly Powers and Virtues, as I shall say at once sect. seqq.