Palladium theologicum, Tomus quintus: De virtutibus
Gaudenzio da Brescia (1612–1672)
Reuerendi patris Gaudentij Bontempi, ... Palladium theologicum, seu Tota theologia scholastica in septem tomos distributa. Ad intimam mentem d. Bonauenturae seraphici doctoris ... Tomus quintus, De virtutibus
First published 1676
Bontempi's Palladium theologicum (Lyon 1676) is a complete scholastic theology composed ad mentem D. Bonaventurae, arranged in seven tractatus on the order of the Secunda secundae. This fifth volume, De virtutibus, treats the theological virtues (faith, hope, charity, with their gifts, beatitudes and fruits), the cardinal virtues and their opposite vices, and the states and offices of men (religious and prelates, bishops, princes), including the extensive disputations on contracts, religion, vows, fortitude, temperance and the judicial process. It is a significant example of the Bonaventurian scholastic school and a counterpart to the Thomist manuals of the period.
Tractatus I: PRIMUS DE VIRTUTIBUS THEOLOGICIS
Proemium I: Prooemium
Disputatio I: ON FAITH
Quaestio I: What FAITH signifies, and what it is
Quaestio II: What the object of FAITH is
Quaestio III: Whether the object of FAITH is something complex
Quaestio IV: Whether the object of FAITH can be false
Quaestio V: Whether the object of FAITH can be evident scientifically
Quaestio VI: Whether FAITH is concerned with those things which are seen by vision on the way
Quaestio VII: Whether the articles of FAITH are evidently credible
Quaestio VIII: Whether the things to be believed are rightly arranged according to the articles
Quaestio IX: Whether the articles of FAITH have grown over the course of time
Quaestio X: Whether FAITH has grown as regards light
Quaestio XI: Whether Faith has grown in certitude
Quaestio XII: Whether the articles of Faith are to be expounded by some authority which is an infallible teacher, and what it is
Quaestio XIII: What are the marks of the true Church, in which the authority of expounding FAITH resides
Quaestio XIV: What must be believed by the necessity of means
Quaestio XV: What things are to be believed by the necessity of precept
Quaestio XVI: Whether we are bound to confess FAITH, and when
Quaestio XVII: Whether it is lawful to dispute about FAITH, and when
Quaestio XVIII: Whether Faith resides in the Intellect
Quaestio XIX: Whether Faith is perfected by Charity, as by its form
Quaestio XX: Whether it is certain that FAITH remains without CHARITY
Quaestio XXI: Whether, and how, FAITH is a VIRTUE
Quaestio XXII: Whether FAITH is ONE VIRTUE
Quaestio XXIII: Whether FAITH is the first of the Virtues
Quaestio XXIV: Whether FAITH is more certain than any science, or than any intellectual habit
Quaestio XXV: Whether one can know with certainty that he has FAITH
Quaestio XXVI: In whom FAITH is found
Quaestio XXVII: Whether FAITH is a substantial Gift of GOD
Quaestio XXVIII: Whether the difference between FAITH and other acts, natural as opposed to supernatural moral acts, always arises from the object
Quaestio XXIX: On the effects of FAITH
Quaestio XXX: On the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING
Dubitatio I: Whether UNDERSTANDING is a gift of the Holy Ghost
Dubitatio II: Whether the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING can coexist with FAITH
Dubitatio III: Whether the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING consists in the contemplation of the Creator and of Creation
Dubitatio IV: Whether the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING is found in all who have grace, and whether in these alone
Dubitatio V: What is the necessity and utility of the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING
Dubitatio VI: Whether* **the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING** *corresponds to the sixth beatitude, namely, Blessed are the clean of heart, etc.
Dubitatio VII: Whether* **to the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING** *there corresponds, among the fruits of the Holy Ghost, Faith
Quaestio XXXI: On the Gift of Knowledge
Dubitatio I: Whether* **KNOWLEDGE** *is a gift of the Holy Ghost
Dubitatio II: Whether knowledge is concerned with Divine things
Dubitatio III: Whether the gift of knowledge is speculative
Dubitatio IV: Whether the third Beatitude corresponds to the Gift of Knowledge: Blessed are they that mourn, etc.
Disputatio II: On Unbelief
Quaestio I: What UNBELIEF is, and what kind of sin it is
Quaestio II: Whether all the works of unbelievers are sins
Quaestio III: Whether unbelievers can be compelled to hear FAITH
Quaestio IV: Whether unbelievers can be compelled to embrace our FAITH, when it has been sufficiently set forth
Quaestio V: Whether unbaptized unbelievers can be compelled to abandon errors or rites contrary to natural reason
Quaestio VI: Whether the rites of unbelievers are to be permitted
Quaestio VII: Whether it is lawful to make agreements with unbelievers about the toleration of their rites
Quaestio VIII: Whether unbaptized unbelievers can retain power over the Faithful, and whether they can be deprived of it
Disputatio III: On Heresy
Quaestio I: What HERESY is
Quaestio II: Whether one who doubts about the articles of FAITH is a heretic
Quaestio III: Whether one who gives merely opinionative assent to an article of FAITH is a heretic
Quaestio IV: Whether, and what, Ignorance excuses from Heresy
Quaestio V: What pertinacity is required for HERESY
Quaestio VI: Whether, for one to be deemed a Heretic, it is necessary that he have been baptized and a believer
Quaestio VII: Whether the Church can compel heretics to receive the Catholic FAITH
Quaestio VIII: On the other means the Church uses against heretics, by forbidding their Books
Quaestio IX: Whether we are bound to avoid the conversation of heretics
Quaestio X: What excommunication is inflicted upon heretics
Quaestio XI: On the other spiritual punishments of heretics
Quaestio XII: On the temporal punishments of Heretics
Disputatio IV: On Hope
Quaestio I: What HOPE is
Quaestio II: What the material object of HOPE is
Question III
Quaestio IV: Whether a certain object is set forth for HOPE, and is hoped for
Quaestio V: Whether Hope is a Virtue
Quaestio VI: Whether HOPE is a Theological Virtue
Quaestio VII: Whether HOPE is at times formless
Quaestio VIII: Whether HOPE arises from merits
Quaestio IX: Whether Hope precedes Charity
Quaestio X: What the proximate subject of HOPE is
Quaestio XI: Whether HOPE remains in the Blessed
Quaestio XII: Whether there is a precept of hoping in GOD
Dubitatio I: UNICA. Would this precept bind one to whom certain damnation had been revealed
Disputatio V: On the Gift of Fear
Quaestio I: Whether FEAR is a Habit distinct from HOPE
Quaestio II: What the object of FEAR is
Quaestio III: Whether worldly Fear is always evil
Quaestio IV: Whether servile Fear is honorable, and a Gift of God
Quaestio V: Whether servile Fear is cast out when grace comes
Quaestio VI: Whether Initial and Filial Fear differ specifically
Quaestio VII: Whether, as Charity grows, Fear diminishes
Quaestio VIII: Whether gratuitous Fear remains in the fatherland
Quaestio IX: Whether Poverty of Spirit corresponds to the GIFT OF FEAR
Quaestio X: On the Effects, and the precept, of the FEAR OF GOD
Disputatio VI: On Despair
Quaestio I: UNICA. Of what power DESPAIR is an act, and what sin it is
Disputatio VII: On Presumption
Quaestio I: What PRESUMPTION is, and what kind of sin
Disputatio VIII: On Charity
Quaestio I: What CHARITY is
Quaestio II: What the object of Charity is
Quaestio III: Whether Charity is properly the friendship of God
Quaestio IV: Whether Charity is a created Habit
Quaestio V: Whether Charity is one special Virtue
Quaestio VI: Whether Charity is of a most special species
Quaestio VII: Whether Charity is the most excellent of the virtues
Quaestio VIII: Whether Charity is the Form of the Virtues
Quaestio IX: Whether besides infused Charity there is another charity, acquired by our own acts
Quaestio X: Whether Charity can be formless
Quaestio XI: Whether CHARITY increases, and how
Quaestio XII: Whether, and how, CHARITY in this life is perfect
Quaestio XIII: Whether Charity can be lost, and how
Quaestio XIV: What is the proximate subject of Charity
Quaestio XV: Whether God alone is to be loved out of Charity, or the neighbor also
Quaestio XVI: Whether Charity is to be loved out of Charity
Quaestio XVII: Whether all gratuitous gifts are to be loved out of CHARITY
Quaestio XVIII: Whether irrational creatures are to be loved out of CHARITY
Quaestio XIX: Whether a man ought to love himself out of CHARITY
Quaestio XX: Whether a man ought to love his own body out of Charity
Quaestio XXI: Whether sinners are to be loved out of Charity
Quaestio XXII: Whether it is necessary to love enemies out of CHARITY
Quaestio XXIII: Whether we are bound to show the effects of CHARITY toward enemies, and which
Quaestio XXIV: Whether Angels are to be loved out of CHARITY
Quaestio XXV: Whether Demons, and the Damned, are to be loved out of CHARITY
Quaestio XXVI: Whether it is fitting that four things to be loved out of CHARITY are enumerated
Quaestio XXVII: Whether God, and the neighbor, are loved with the same habit of CHARITY
Quaestio XXVIII: Whether there is order in CHARITY
Quaestio XXIX: Whether GOD is to be loved more than the neighbor
Quaestio XXX: Whether a man ought out of CHARITY to love God more than himself
Quaestio XXXI: Whether Nature inclines more to loving GOD than to loving ourselves
Quaestio XXXII: Whether a man ought to love himself more than his neighbor
Quaestio XXXIII: Whether the eternal salvation of the neighbor is to be loved more than our own life
Quaestio XXXIV: Whether one neighbor is to be loved more than another
Quaestio XXXV: Whether a Son is to be loved more than a Father
Quaestio XXXVI: Whether a man ought out of CHARITY to love his Mother more than his Father
Quaestio XXXVII: Whether a man ought to love his spouse more than his parents, and Children
Quaestio XXXVIII: Whether the order of CHARITY is considered in the affection, and in the effect
Quaestio XXXIX: Whether the order of CHARITY remains in heaven
Quaestio XL: Whether it is more proper to Charity to love than to be loved
Quaestio XLI: Whether Love is the same as Benevolence
Quaestio XLII: Whether, and whether he can, GOD must be loved in the way with the whole heart, the whole soul, the whole mind, and all one's strength
Quaestio XLIII: Whether some measure is to be kept in Divine love
Quaestio XLIV: Whether Charity ought to be enlarged in heaven
Quaestio XLV: Whether it is more meritorious to love an enemy than a friend
Quaestio XLVI: Whether a man, constituted in however small CHARITY, is bound to undergo death for CHRIST
Quaestio XLVII: Whether those having perfect CHARITY are bound to fulfill the things that are of perfection
Quaestio XLVIII: How, and when, the precept of the love of GOD binds
Quaestio XLIX: Whether a man is bound at the first instant of the use of reason to be converted to GOD
Quaestio L: How, and when, the precept of the love of the neighbor binds
Disputatio IX: On the internal effects of Charity, JOY, PEACE, and MERCY
§ I: On Joy
Quaestio I: Whether JOY is an Effect of Charity, and of what kind
Quaestio II: Whether JOY is a virtue
§ II: On Peace
Quaestio I: UNICA. What PEACE is
§ III: On Mercy
Quaestio I: What MERCY is
Quaestio II: Which, and what kind of Virtue, MERCY is
Disputatio X: On the external effects of Charity
§ I: De Beneficentia
Quaestio I: UNICA. What BENEFICENCE is
§ II: On Almsgiving
Quaestio I: Whether to give ALMS is an act of Charity
Quaestio II: Whether the kinds of ALMS are fittingly distinguished
Quaestio III: Whether ALMS is a matter of precept
Quaestio IV: Whether it is a precept, in common necessities, to give superfluities to the poor
Quaestio V: Whether anyone is bound at some time to give alms from things necessary to his state, apart from the extreme necessity of the neighbor
Quaestio VI: Whether alms is owed out of justice to one in extreme need
Quaestio VII: Whether Alms ought to be given from justly possessed goods
§ III: On Fraternal Correction
Quaestio I: Whether FRATERNAL CORRECTION is a matter of precept
Quaestio II: Whether the order of fraternal correction, even in Religious Orders, is a matter of precept, so that the correction first be made in secret
Disputatio XI: On Hatred
Quaestio I: What the object of HATRED is, and what it is
Quaestio II: What, and what kind of sin, hatred is
Disputatio XII: On Sloth
Quaestio I: What ACEDIA is, and what its object is
Disputatio XIII: On Envy
Quaestio I: What ENVY is, and what its object is
Quaestio II: How perverse ENVY is
Disputatio XIV: On Discord, and Contention
Quaestio I: What DISCORD is, and what kind of sin
Quaestio II: What kind, and how great, a sin Contention is
Disputatio XV: On Schism
Quaestio I: What kind of sin SCHISM is
Quaestio II: How great a sin SCHISM is
Quaestio III: What punishments are owed to SCHISMATICS
Disputatio XVI: DE BELLO
Quaestio I: Whether any war can be just
Quaestio II: What conditions are required for a just war
Quaestio III: By whom BELLUM (war) may be waged
Disputatio XVII: On Quarreling, and Sedition
Quaestio I: What RIXA (quarreling) is, and what kind of sin
Quaestio II: What sedition is
Disputatio XVIII: On Scandal
Quaestio I: What, and of how many kinds, SCANDAL is
Quaestio II: Whether SCANDAL is a special sin
Quaestio III: What is to be done, and what omitted, to avoid scandal
Quaestio IV: Whether it is lawful to persuade one resolved upon a great evil into a lesser evil
Disputatio XIX: On the Gift of Wisdom
Quaestio I: What kind of gift WISDOM is
Quaestio II: What is the usefulness, and necessity, of this Gift
Quaestio III: By what means is the GIFT OF WISDOM obtained from God
Quaestio IV: On the illumination that Wisdom brings
Quaestio V: On the spiritual delights of Wisdom
Quaestio VI: How Folly is opposed to Wisdom
Quaestio VII: Whether the seventh Beatitude corresponds to the gift of Wisdom
Disputatio XX: On Prudence
Quaestio I: What PRUDENCE is
Quaestio II: Whether PRUDENCE is a virtue
Quaestio III: Which are the offices of PRUDENCE
Quaestio IV: Who are the participants in PRUDENCE
Quaestio V: How Prudence is acquired, and lost
Quaestio VI: On the parts of the Virtue of PRUDENCE
Quaestio VII: How certain rules of prudence, applicable to the Monastic and Political state, are drawn from the Angelic Hierarchy
§ I: On the Prudence that men bound by solemn vows claim for themselves from the first choir of Angels
On Prudence, which men bound by solemn vows claim for themselves from the first choir of Angels.
S. Doctor SUPPOSES here those three Hierarchical operations, to Purify, to Illuminate, and to Perfect; and by the names of Angels he proves at once private persons on account of certain excellences, and also rectors and Princes on account of their governance. Thus Matth. 11. John is called an Angel; and II. Reg. 14. and 19. David is compared to an Angel. So too in Apoc. the Rectors of the Churches are called Angels.
Therefore he first applies the supreme Hierarchy to the Religious, and to all perfect in vows.
He calls the Religious SERAPHIM, named from the divine fires of Charity, to whom he applies Heb. I. Who maketh his angels spirits, and his ministers a flame of fire, and Apoc. 10. I saw an Angel, whose face was as the sun, and his feet as a pillar of fire. And Isa. 6. One of the Seraphim flew to me, and in his hand a live coal, etc. Therefore thus the servants of God, kindled, ought to imitate the nature of fire: for fire is always raised upward, it consumes rust, and resolves earthly things into itself; it is moved most swiftly, it spreads itself to all things to be converted to itself.
THUS the Religious, kindled with the fire of Charity, will be proved, if they ascend swiftly, despising earthly things; if they strive to resolve all things into the love of God; if they work swiftly and with speed, as it is said: Isa. 18. Go, ye swift angels, and Ezech. I. Whithersoever the Spirit went, the wheels were lifted up following him, for the spirit of life, etc.; that is, they ought to shine with the best example of Charity, for the life of the religious is the exemplar of others. Therefore Deuter. 17. They shall receive the exemplar of the law from the priests, and I Timot. IV. Be thou an example of the faithful.
They ought moreover to PURIFY others, as it is said Malach. III. He shall sit like a refiner's fire, and shall purge the sons of Levi. Therefore the Seraphim say to Isaias: Thy iniquity shall be taken away, and thy sin shall be purged.
They ILLUMINATE also, Matth. V. You are the light of the world, Ephes. V. Walk as children of the light in love.
FROM the Seraphim of Isa. VI. shining forth, he argues what kind of flame the religious ought to shine with, for the example of others.
FIRST they are said to have been two, whereby is expressed their dwelling together in Charity. Therefore also the Lord sent his disciples two by two. Lucae X. and Ecclesiasticus IV. It is better that there be two together than one: for they have the advantage of their society. And Genes. XIX. Two Angels were sent into Pentapolis. Whereby a grave precept of prudence is given, that life in the Coenobia is safer than in the solitude of the Anachoretic life.
SECONDLY, those Seraphim were not seated, but stood. Whence in Psalm. 121. Our feet were standing in thy courts, O Jerusalem.
HIEREMIAE VI. Stand upon your ways, and see, and ask which is the good way? and Psalm. V. In the morning I will stand before thee, and will see, and Habac. II. I will stand upon my watch, and Apoc. VIII. An Angel stood near the altar of the temple. Therefore the unwearied raising of the intention to God is handed down in all things.
Each had six wings singly, that is twelve, whereby the spiritual and corporal works of mercy are signified, and they were joined one to another, as is said Ezech. I. With these wings he ought swiftly to work for the salvation of all.
With these wings they veiled their hands and their feet, by working, that they might not be seen, of which Matth. VI. Let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doth. Therefore he veils his head, hands, and feet, who desires neither in the beginning, nor in the end, nor in the middle to be praised for his works.
THESE flew, because the religious ought always to be borne higher into God. Whence Psalm. 54. Who will give me wings, etc. Therefore with the multiplied motion of spiritual wings, they ought assiduously by contemplation and action to ascend on high, never languishing, nor ever idling.
THESE cried: HOLY, HOLY, HOLY, one to the other, because in the Divine praises they are held to cry out perpetually. Thrice they pray, that they may be rightly instructed, promoted, and brought to salvation. Therefore Ioan. XVII. Sanctify them in truth, that they themselves may be sanctified, and consummated in one, etc.
WHEN indeed the lips of Isaias, defiled, were purged with a burning coal, and it kindled him, that he might offer himself for the divine missions, it expresses that the religious, most pure in themselves, are held bound to purify others with holy fire, to illuminate, and to kindle them unto works of salvation; thus Moses Num. XI. purged Mary the leper by prayers in a figure, and S. Job his friends, Iob in the last chapter.
There FOLLOWS the order of the Cherubim from the wisdom, with which religious men are held to be endowed and to illuminate others. Now this wisdom is practical, or prudence, as the holy Doctor advertises, Lib. I. cap. 3., which is not worldly wisdom, of which Lucae XVI. The children of this world are more prudent than the children of the light, which is in the avaricious; nor ought it to be the prudence of the flesh, which is death, as is said Rom. VIII., and it is in the voluptuous, because this wisdom is not found in the land of them that live sweetly, Iob 28.; nor ought it to be diabolical, of which Isa. V. Woe to you that are wise in your own eyes, etc. Therefore recourse must be had to the wisdom that is from above, which is chaste, peaceable, etc.
Now TWO Cherubim of gold are indicated Exodi 25., because there must be in them a twofold wisdom, and prudence. One of the things to be done concerning themselves and their neighbor: the other of the things to be done concerning God; and both golden, that is of Charity. Therefore gold most pure is given for the Cherubim, primo Paral. 28., which signifies the purity of conscience, from which it follows that they see God, which is beatitude, given to the clean of heart. Then indeed it follows that, radiated with divine light, they see most clearly (as the holy Doctor says). Therefore the Cherubim Ezech. I. and Apoc. IV. were full of eyes before and behind, because men compared to the Angels, the Cherubim, by the grace of circumspection, and the gift of providence, which are parts of prudence, see gilded on every side, they provide, and each keeps watch over the perils of the other. Whence also the Cherubim looked upon one another above the Propitiatory.
THESE are raised up into God with holy quiet. Therefore God dwells in them, who sitteth over the Cherubim; and these also draw others. Therefore Ezech. X. when the Cherubim were lifted up, the others also were lifted up; for upon the holiness of the religious hangs also the salvation of seculars. Therefore Iudith, cap. 8., says: and now, brethren, since you are the priests in the people of God, upon you depends their soul.
THESE are the interpreters of God; therefore in a figure from the propitiatory, between the two Cherubim, the voice of God went forth, Num. VII. and Ezech. I.: The sound of the wings of the Cherubim was as the voice of God.
THESE ought to keep the way of the tree of life, and to show it with the flaming sword, as is said Genes. III., and to cry out to all that word of Hierem. VI. This is the way, walk ye in it.
The THIRD order is that of the Thrones, in which Divine Justice dwells, Psalm. IX. Thou sittest upon the throne, who judgest justice.
God dwells upon the humble, as Isa. 66. says, and Dan. VII. His throne is a flame of fire. These are the Religious, as Origenes expounds there: For as the Thrones are the seats of God, compacted and joined into one, as D. Hieronymus says, cap. 7. de coelesti Hierarchia; so the religious, compacted into one place of quiet, are the Thrones of the Most High: These are the ivory Thrones, shadowed forth in the Throne of Solomon, of which II. Paral. IX. III. Reg. X. and Cant. II., the symbol of chastity, in which God rests, who feeds among the lilies: Therefore he rested in the womb of the B. Virgin, which is called ivory, Cant. V.
They ought to be Thrones of Sapphire, of which Ezech. I.
Ezech. I. The likeness of the Throne was as the appearance of a Sapphire. Now the Sapphire is a gem of heavenly color, starred, which signifies heavenly conversation. In the Sapphire the Law of Moses was written by God: so the religious are raised up from earthly things by poverty. To them it is said Isa. LVIII. I will lift thee up above the height of the earth, and I will feed thee with the inheritance of Jacob thy father, etc.
See the holy Doctor there, wonderfully eloquent, on how he becomes the best of religious who shall have drawn these lessons from things above.