Palladium theologicum, Tomus quintus: De virtutibus

Gaudenzio da Brescia

Palladium theologicum, Tomus quintus: De virtutibus

Gaudenzio da Brescia (1612–1672)

Reuerendi patris Gaudentij Bontempi, ... Palladium theologicum, seu Tota theologia scholastica in septem tomos distributa. Ad intimam mentem d. Bonauenturae seraphici doctoris ... Tomus quintus, De virtutibus

First published 1676

Bontempi's Palladium theologicum (Lyon 1676) is a complete scholastic theology composed ad mentem D. Bonaventurae, arranged in seven tractatus on the order of the Secunda secundae. This fifth volume, De virtutibus, treats the theological virtues (faith, hope, charity, with their gifts, beatitudes and fruits), the cardinal virtues and their opposite vices, and the states and offices of men (religious and prelates, bishops, princes), including the extensive disputations on contracts, religion, vows, fortitude, temperance and the judicial process. It is a significant example of the Bonaventurian scholastic school and a counterpart to the Thomist manuals of the period.


Tractatus I: PRIMUS DE VIRTUTIBUS THEOLOGICIS

Proemium I: Prooemium

Disputatio I: ON FAITH

Quaestio I: What FAITH signifies, and what it is

Quaestio II: What the object of FAITH is

Quaestio III: Whether the object of FAITH is something complex

Quaestio IV: Whether the object of FAITH can be false

Quaestio V: Whether the object of FAITH can be evident scientifically

Quaestio VI: Whether FAITH is concerned with those things which are seen by vision on the way

Quaestio VII: Whether the articles of FAITH are evidently credible

Quaestio VIII: Whether the things to be believed are rightly arranged according to the articles

Quaestio IX: Whether the articles of FAITH have grown over the course of time

Quaestio X: Whether FAITH has grown as regards light

Quaestio XI: Whether Faith has grown in certitude

Quaestio XII: Whether the articles of Faith are to be expounded by some authority which is an infallible teacher, and what it is

Quaestio XIII: What are the marks of the true Church, in which the authority of expounding FAITH resides

Quaestio XIV: What must be believed by the necessity of means

Quaestio XV: What things are to be believed by the necessity of precept

Quaestio XVI: Whether we are bound to confess FAITH, and when

Quaestio XVII: Whether it is lawful to dispute about FAITH, and when

Quaestio XVIII: Whether Faith resides in the Intellect

Quaestio XIX: Whether Faith is perfected by Charity, as by its form

Quaestio XX: Whether it is certain that FAITH remains without CHARITY

Quaestio XXI: Whether, and how, FAITH is a VIRTUE

Quaestio XXII: Whether FAITH is ONE VIRTUE

Quaestio XXIII: Whether FAITH is the first of the Virtues

Quaestio XXIV: Whether FAITH is more certain than any science, or than any intellectual habit

Quaestio XXV: Whether one can know with certainty that he has FAITH

Quaestio XXVI: In whom FAITH is found

Quaestio XXVII: Whether FAITH is a substantial Gift of GOD

Quaestio XXVIII: Whether the difference between FAITH and other acts, natural as opposed to supernatural moral acts, always arises from the object

Quaestio XXIX: On the effects of FAITH

Quaestio XXX: On the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING

Dubitatio I: Whether UNDERSTANDING is a gift of the Holy Ghost

Dubitatio II: Whether the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING can coexist with FAITH

Dubitatio III: Whether the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING consists in the contemplation of the Creator and of Creation

Dubitatio IV: Whether the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING is found in all who have grace, and whether in these alone

Dubitatio V: What is the necessity and utility of the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING

Dubitatio VI: Whether* **the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING** *corresponds to the sixth beatitude, namely, Blessed are the clean of heart, etc.

Dubitatio VII: Whether* **to the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING** *there corresponds, among the fruits of the Holy Ghost, Faith

Quaestio XXXI: On the Gift of Knowledge

Dubitatio I: Whether* **KNOWLEDGE** *is a gift of the Holy Ghost

Dubitatio II: Whether knowledge is concerned with Divine things

Dubitatio III: Whether the gift of knowledge is speculative

Dubitatio IV: Whether the third Beatitude corresponds to the Gift of Knowledge: Blessed are they that mourn, etc.

Disputatio II: On Unbelief

Quaestio I: What UNBELIEF is, and what kind of sin it is

Quaestio II: Whether all the works of unbelievers are sins

Quaestio III: Whether unbelievers can be compelled to hear FAITH

Quaestio IV: Whether unbelievers can be compelled to embrace our FAITH, when it has been sufficiently set forth

Quaestio V: Whether unbaptized unbelievers can be compelled to abandon errors or rites contrary to natural reason

Quaestio VI: Whether the rites of unbelievers are to be permitted

Quaestio VII: Whether it is lawful to make agreements with unbelievers about the toleration of their rites

Quaestio VIII: Whether unbaptized unbelievers can retain power over the Faithful, and whether they can be deprived of it

Disputatio III: On Heresy

Quaestio I: What HERESY is

Quaestio II: Whether one who doubts about the articles of FAITH is a heretic

Quaestio III: Whether one who gives merely opinionative assent to an article of FAITH is a heretic

Quaestio IV: Whether, and what, Ignorance excuses from Heresy

Quaestio V: What pertinacity is required for HERESY

Quaestio VI: Whether, for one to be deemed a Heretic, it is necessary that he have been baptized and a believer

Quaestio VII: Whether the Church can compel heretics to receive the Catholic FAITH

Quaestio VIII: On the other means the Church uses against heretics, by forbidding their Books

Quaestio IX: Whether we are bound to avoid the conversation of heretics

Quaestio X: What excommunication is inflicted upon heretics

Quaestio XI: On the other spiritual punishments of heretics

Quaestio XII: On the temporal punishments of Heretics

Disputatio IV: On Hope

Quaestio I: What HOPE is

Quaestio II: What the material object of HOPE is

Question III

Quaestio IV: Whether a certain object is set forth for HOPE, and is hoped for

Quaestio V: Whether Hope is a Virtue

Quaestio VI: Whether HOPE is a Theological Virtue

Quaestio VII: Whether HOPE is at times formless

Quaestio VIII: Whether HOPE arises from merits

Quaestio IX: Whether Hope precedes Charity

Quaestio X: What the proximate subject of HOPE is

Quaestio XI: Whether HOPE remains in the Blessed

Quaestio XII: Whether there is a precept of hoping in GOD

Dubitatio I: UNICA. Would this precept bind one to whom certain damnation had been revealed

Disputatio V: On the Gift of Fear

Quaestio I: Whether FEAR is a Habit distinct from HOPE

Quaestio II: What the object of FEAR is

Quaestio III: Whether worldly Fear is always evil

Quaestio IV: Whether servile Fear is honorable, and a Gift of God

Quaestio V: Whether servile Fear is cast out when grace comes

Quaestio VI: Whether Initial and Filial Fear differ specifically

Quaestio VII: Whether, as Charity grows, Fear diminishes

Quaestio VIII: Whether gratuitous Fear remains in the fatherland

Quaestio IX: Whether Poverty of Spirit corresponds to the GIFT OF FEAR

Quaestio X: On the Effects, and the precept, of the FEAR OF GOD

Disputatio VI: On Despair

Quaestio I: UNICA. Of what power DESPAIR is an act, and what sin it is

Disputatio VII: On Presumption

Quaestio I: What PRESUMPTION is, and what kind of sin

Disputatio VIII: On Charity

Quaestio I: What CHARITY is

Quaestio II: What the object of Charity is

Quaestio III: Whether Charity is properly the friendship of God

Quaestio IV: Whether Charity is a created Habit

Quaestio V: Whether Charity is one special Virtue

Quaestio VI: Whether Charity is of a most special species

Quaestio VII: Whether Charity is the most excellent of the virtues

Quaestio VIII: Whether Charity is the Form of the Virtues

Quaestio IX: Whether besides infused Charity there is another charity, acquired by our own acts

Quaestio X: Whether Charity can be formless

Quaestio XI: Whether CHARITY increases, and how

Quaestio XII: Whether, and how, CHARITY in this life is perfect

Quaestio XIII: Whether Charity can be lost, and how

Quaestio XIV: What is the proximate subject of Charity

Quaestio XV: Whether God alone is to be loved out of Charity, or the neighbor also

Quaestio XVI: Whether Charity is to be loved out of Charity

Quaestio XVII: Whether all gratuitous gifts are to be loved out of CHARITY

Quaestio XVIII: Whether irrational creatures are to be loved out of CHARITY

Quaestio XIX: Whether a man ought to love himself out of CHARITY

Quaestio XX: Whether a man ought to love his own body out of Charity

Quaestio XXI: Whether sinners are to be loved out of Charity

Quaestio XXII: Whether it is necessary to love enemies out of CHARITY

Quaestio XXIII: Whether we are bound to show the effects of CHARITY toward enemies, and which

Quaestio XXIV: Whether Angels are to be loved out of CHARITY

Quaestio XXV: Whether Demons, and the Damned, are to be loved out of CHARITY

Quaestio XXVI: Whether it is fitting that four things to be loved out of CHARITY are enumerated

Quaestio XXVII: Whether God, and the neighbor, are loved with the same habit of CHARITY

Quaestio XXVIII: Whether there is order in CHARITY

Quaestio XXIX: Whether GOD is to be loved more than the neighbor

Quaestio XXX: Whether a man ought out of CHARITY to love God more than himself

Quaestio XXXI: Whether Nature inclines more to loving GOD than to loving ourselves

Quaestio XXXII: Whether a man ought to love himself more than his neighbor

Quaestio XXXIII: Whether the eternal salvation of the neighbor is to be loved more than our own life

Quaestio XXXIV: Whether one neighbor is to be loved more than another

Quaestio XXXV: Whether a Son is to be loved more than a Father

Quaestio XXXVI: Whether a man ought out of CHARITY to love his Mother more than his Father

Quaestio XXXVII: Whether a man ought to love his spouse more than his parents, and Children

Quaestio XXXVIII: Whether the order of CHARITY is considered in the affection, and in the effect

Quaestio XXXIX: Whether the order of CHARITY remains in heaven

Quaestio XL: Whether it is more proper to Charity to love than to be loved

Quaestio XLI: Whether Love is the same as Benevolence

Quaestio XLII: Whether, and whether he can, GOD must be loved in the way with the whole heart, the whole soul, the whole mind, and all one's strength

Quaestio XLIII: Whether some measure is to be kept in Divine love

Quaestio XLIV: Whether Charity ought to be enlarged in heaven

Quaestio XLV: Whether it is more meritorious to love an enemy than a friend

Quaestio XLVI: Whether a man, constituted in however small CHARITY, is bound to undergo death for CHRIST

Quaestio XLVII: Whether those having perfect CHARITY are bound to fulfill the things that are of perfection

Quaestio XLVIII: How, and when, the precept of the love of GOD binds

Quaestio XLIX: Whether a man is bound at the first instant of the use of reason to be converted to GOD

Quaestio L: How, and when, the precept of the love of the neighbor binds

Disputatio IX: On the internal effects of Charity, JOY, PEACE, and MERCY

§ I: On Joy

Quaestio I: Whether JOY is an Effect of Charity, and of what kind

Quaestio II: Whether JOY is a virtue

§ II: On Peace

Quaestio I: UNICA. What PEACE is

§ III: On Mercy

Quaestio I: What MERCY is

Quaestio II: Which, and what kind of Virtue, MERCY is

Disputatio X: On the external effects of Charity

§ I: De Beneficentia

Quaestio I: UNICA. What BENEFICENCE is

§ II: On Almsgiving

Quaestio I: Whether to give ALMS is an act of Charity

Quaestio II: Whether the kinds of ALMS are fittingly distinguished

Quaestio III: Whether ALMS is a matter of precept

Quaestio IV: Whether it is a precept, in common necessities, to give superfluities to the poor

Quaestio V: Whether anyone is bound at some time to give alms from things necessary to his state, apart from the extreme necessity of the neighbor

Quaestio VI: Whether alms is owed out of justice to one in extreme need

Quaestio VII: Whether Alms ought to be given from justly possessed goods

§ III: On Fraternal Correction

Quaestio I: Whether FRATERNAL CORRECTION is a matter of precept

Quaestio II: Whether the order of fraternal correction, even in Religious Orders, is a matter of precept, so that the correction first be made in secret

Disputatio XI: On Hatred

Quaestio I: What the object of HATRED is, and what it is

Quaestio II: What, and what kind of sin, hatred is

Disputatio XII: On Sloth

Quaestio I: What ACEDIA is, and what its object is

Disputatio XIII: On Envy

Quaestio I: What ENVY is, and what its object is

Quaestio II: How perverse ENVY is

Disputatio XIV: On Discord, and Contention

Quaestio I: What DISCORD is, and what kind of sin

Quaestio II: What kind, and how great, a sin Contention is

Disputatio XV: On Schism

Quaestio I: What kind of sin SCHISM is

Quaestio II: How great a sin SCHISM is

Quaestio III: What punishments are owed to SCHISMATICS

Disputatio XVI: DE BELLO

Quaestio I: Whether any war can be just

Quaestio II: What conditions are required for a just war

Quaestio III: By whom BELLUM (war) may be waged

Disputatio XVII: On Quarreling, and Sedition

Quaestio I: What RIXA (quarreling) is, and what kind of sin

Quaestio II: What sedition is

Disputatio XVIII: On Scandal

Quaestio I: What, and of how many kinds, SCANDAL is

Quaestio II: Whether SCANDAL is a special sin

Quaestio III: What is to be done, and what omitted, to avoid scandal

Quaestio IV: Whether it is lawful to persuade one resolved upon a great evil into a lesser evil

Disputatio XIX: On the Gift of Wisdom

On the Gift of Wisdom.

Although charity may make the yoke easy, it is not relishing without wisdom, which affects the affective and the intellective powers together, and the rest, through redundancy; and it is deservedly called a GIFT, because it is not acquired by study, but given by inspiration; wherefore St. James says cap. 1. as the Seraphic Doctor has in Diaeta, tit. 7. cap. 4. toward the end: If anyone lacks Wisdom, let him ask it of God: Therefore it is compared there to the SUN, most splendid, illuminating all things; to HONEY, most flavorsome, whose taste makes all else insipid; to the SEA finally, most profound, whose ways and paths are unsearchable; see the Seraphic Doctor.

Quaestio I: What kind of gift WISDOM is

What kind of gift WISDOM is.

IT IS TO BE NOTED with St. Bonaventure de septem Itineribus aeternitatis, Itinere 3. dist. 3. art. 3. et de septem donis, de dono Sapientiae, cap. 1. et 3. p. Centiloquii, sect. 45. et aliis locis, Multas enumerari sapientias. I omit the wisdom of the flesh, an enemy to God, as is said Rom. 8., and the wisdom of this world; which is called by St. James, cap. 3., animal, and diabolical, and by Paul is called foolishness, since it prefers transitory goods to eternal ones, as iron to gold. See St. Bonaventure LL. cc.

THERE is Uncreated Wisdom, whose panegyrics the author of Sap. cap. 7. wove together: The brightness of eternal light, the unspotted mirror, etc., which the Holy Doctor elegantly pursues in his Commentary, and St. Augustine lib. 1. de Genes. ad litt. cap 5. Now this wisdom is the SON OF GOD, not a Gift, but the Giver of gifts.

A twofold Created Wisdom is GIVEN: one, which is acquired by human study, and is an intellectual virtue, of which Aristotle lib. 1. Metaph. cap. 2. and St. Augustine lib. 14. de Trinit. cap. 1. say that it is the universal cognition of all things divine and human. This indeed can be called wisdom, because it is sapid knowledge, although not perfectly seasoned; although Aristotle in his Ethics brings forward admirable delights in it, yet St. Thomas adds that these are imperfect, because they are not seasoned with the oil of grace.

BUT that Wisdom can have a judgment somewhat right concerning divine things, as Hugh shows super caelestem Hierarchiam, cap. 1.

There is also that Wisdom which deals with the most abstract and divine things, which Aristotle calls Metaphysics; but we more fittingly name it Theology, at whose splendor earthly wisdom has been eclipsed and has dissolved into fictions. We acquire it, however, with labors, faith presupposed.

FURTHER there is also the other, infused Wisdom, as St. James 3. says, whose object is God, not under the aspect of the naked true, but of the true as to be tasted for good; and this is truly Sapid Knowledge. Of this Sap. 11.: The Spirit of the Lord shall rest upon him, the Spirit of Wisdom, etc.

The act of THIS is to contemplate God, not in any manner whatever, but from love with a certain experimental sweetness and affection. Hence St. Augustine 15. de Trinitate, cap. 7. says: Where there is no love (namely, gratuitous), who says that there is any Wisdom? And Bernard serm. 85. in Cant. Nor would I say it is blameworthy, if anyone should define wisdom as the savor of the good. Hence Isidore, lib. 10. Ethymol.: The wise man is so called from savor; for as taste is apt for the discernment of the savor of foods, so the wise man is apt for discerning the savors of things and of causes.

From these you have that the Gift of Wisdom is a supernatural habit, infused into the soul by the Holy Spirit, for knowing God and loving him with relish. It is thus defined: It is a habit, infused by God, rendering the soul easily mobile toward loving and tasting the Gifts out of love, or Charity. Therefore its act is to contemplate God, not in any manner whatever, but from love, with a certain experimental sweetness and affection.

The principal OBJECT, therefore, of Wisdom is God, not under the aspect of the true absolutely; but under the aspect of the true in relation to the aspect of the good, as it is excitatory of the will toward its sapid delectation. Hence Wisdom is called, as it were, sapid knowledge, as the Holy Doctor often says. The quasi-subject of Wisdom is indeed the intellect, but one overflowing its operations into the will, as the sun in the fourth heaven influences the other orbs, and the elements. Therefore the Holy Doctor proves that it does not stop in the intellect lib. de septem donis, De Dono sapientiae, cap. 1. et in Diaeta, tit. 6. cap. 4. et in 1. quaest. 3. Prooem. from Scripture, and the Fathers.

FIRST indeed Eccles. 6. says: For wisdom is according to its name [the doctrine of it], that is, sapid knowledge.

St. Thomas answers quaest. 45. art. 2. ad 2. Tanner disp. 2. quaest. 4. dub. 3. num. 44. et alii, that this does not seem to be the true interpretation of the name wisdom, namely, that it is Wisdom, as it were sapid knowledge.

AGAINST this, because thus the Holy Fathers, cited by the Holy Doctor, interpret it. St. Bernard, sermone 85. in Cant. Nor would I say it is blameworthy, if anyone should define wisdom as the good. Isidore, lib. 10. Ethymol., word Sapiens: The wise man is so called from Savor; for as taste is apt for the discernment of the savor of foods, so the wise man is apt for discerning the savors of things and of causes, as I had noted just above.

He CONFIRMS it from cap. 24. where Wisdom says: My spirit is sweeter than honey.

St. Thomas answers that this is had in the Latin, not in the Greek; but the sense is, that Wisdom is according to its name, that is, Great, nor is it less than its name, that is, Fame. But in the Greek it is read, according to its name, τὸ ὄνομα.

THEN I say that it cannot be without charity. It is proved by the Holy Doctor ad id Sap. 1. Into a malevolent soul Wisdom shall not enter.

It is PROVED by the Holy Doctors, because it makes rightness of judgment: toward itself and of savor concerning divine things, according to the divine rules to which it is connatural, which indeed are through Charity.

Quaestio II: What is the usefulness, and necessity, of this Gift

What is the utility, and necessity of this Gift.

IT IS TO BE NOTED first with St. Bonaventure de Dono Sapientiae, cap. 2. from St. Bernard lib. de natura, et dignitate amoris Divini, cap. 7. that: As the body has its five senses, by which it is joined to the soul, life mediating; so the Soul has its five spiritual senses, by which it is joined to God, Charity mediating; and as all the senses, without the sense of Taste, are weakened and dulled in their operations; so all the spiritual senses are weakened and languish in their works without the sapiential taste, which makes spiritual things relishable and flavorful. This savor, as St. Bernard says, serm. 85. in Cant., we lost in the eating of the sour apple, infected with poison, from which our cravings now have a taste for us. But this sense is repaired through wisdom, so that divine things become sweet to us; whence the powers of the soul are revived, as St. Bernard says above, cap. 10. Therefore the sense of Hearing it excites to hearing the word of God; the sense of Smell to following the Beloved, so as to say: We shall run in the odor of your ointments; the sense of Touch to holding the Beloved firmly, so as to say: I held him, and I will not let him go. I will bring him into my father's house, and into the chamber of her that bore me. Cant. 3.

THEREFORE all the spiritual senses are excited by the taste of wisdom to the highest appetible thing, as St. Augustine lib. 10. Confess. cap. 6. teaches.

Of this wisdom James says, cap. 3.: The wisdom that is from above, first indeed is chaste: because it avoids the corruptions of sin; indeed peaceable, and modest, keeping the mean in all things, etc.

Therefore the gift of Wisdom not only teaches one to contemplate divine things with right judgment, but also teaches to regulate human acts in a more excellent manner than the wisdom that is an intellectual virtue teaches. St. Augustine 12. de Trin. cap. 14. brings the reason, saying: The higher part of reason is deputed to wisdom; the lower, however, to knowledge. But the higher reason is for meditations supernal, namely divine, to be beheld and consulted. To be beheld, indeed, insofar as divine things are contemplated in themselves. But to be consulted, insofar as through divine things it indicates concerning human ones, directing human acts by divine rules, so that man be assimilated to God not only according to the image, but also according to the operations, as far as he can. Hence St. Augustine, de serm. Domini in monte cap. 9. says: Wisdom is the contemplation of truth, pacifying the whole man, and taking on the likeness of God. Wisdom is more precious than all works, and all things that are desired are not worth comparison with it.

From what has been said the Holy Doctor, with St. Thomas art. 3., deduces that Wisdom is practical. Hence the Apostle Coloss. 4. says: Walk in wisdom: hence it is elicited also, toward which operation it orders, namely, that the divine things sapidly tasted be judged by a palate cleansed, not infected, and that we famished ones aspire avidly to them, the infection of the evil humor having been removed, in the manner in which, after the gall has been purged by savoring sugar, necessary foods afterwards taste good to us. The same St. Augustine has, 12. de Trin. cap. 14.

The reason is, because the higher any virtue is, the more things it extends to, as is had in lib. de causis, prop. 10. Therefore since wisdom, which is a gift, is more preeminent than wisdom intellectual acquired, which is directed to contemplation, it follows that it extends also to action, as Tannerus also argues num. 39.

You will say that Sap. 8. has: No bitterness is in her conversation (namely, Wisdom's), nor tedium in her company, but joy and gladness. Yet in action tedium and bitterness are found, as St. Gregory lib. 6. Moral. cap. 28. says: In contemplation the principle, which is God, is sought; in operation, however, one labors under heavy necessity of the bundle.

It is answered that the bitterness which is in action does not come from Wisdom; but rather is turned by it into sweetness, as Tannerus observes number 40., from St. Bonaventure on that passage of Wisdom, and St. Thomas.

Quaestio III: By what means is the GIFT OF WISDOM obtained from God

By what means the GIFT OF WISDOM may be obtained from God.

The Holy Doctor observes that Wisdom is found through cognition; but possessed through love; through cognition, indeed, to be seen; through love, however, to be embraced and tasted. To see pertains to the intellect; but to embrace and taste to the will, as Richard says lib. 4. de contempl. cap. 15.: As God is heard through memory, seen through the intellect: so he is embraced and tasted, or bound, through affection, and thus held: And this indeed is more perfect than merely to see, which St. Augustine shows lib. 9. de Trinitate, cap. 12., where he says that the act of embracing is the proper act of the will.

Therefore the wise man teaches to seek Wisdom, Prov. 2.: If you shall seek Wisdom as money, and shall dig for her as for treasures: then you shall understand the fear of the Lord, which is the beginning of wisdom. Expounding which words Jerome says: He who digs for treasures casts aside the earth, digs a pit deep down, diligently persists, until he finds what he seeks. So he who desires to find the treasures of wisdom, let him cast off from himself every earthly weight, make in himself a pit of humility, and not rest, until he finds. These are his words: For wisdom itself is easily seen by those who seek her: and to think of her is a sense brought to perfection. Wisdom, therefore, is to be sought, for as she herself says, Prov. 8.: He who shall find me, shall find life, and shall draw salvation from the Lord.

But how you may recognize that wisdom has been found by you, St. Bernard teaches in his Sentences: You have plainly found wisdom, if you weep for the sins of your former life, if you esteem lightly the desirable things of this age, if you desire eternal beatitude with your whole desire. You have found wisdom, if each of these things tastes to you as they are, so that these indeed are bitter, and altogether to be fled; those also, as it were falling and transitory, to be despised; but these, as perfect goods, to be desired with the whole desire, which you judge and discern with a certain deepest savor of the soul.

Therefore this gift, which is a supernatural habit, is to be earnestly asked of God, as James says, cap. 1.: If any of you want wisdom, let him ask of God, who giveth to all men abundantly, and upbraideth not; and it shall be given him. But let him ask in faith, nothing wavering.

He adds, however, four conditions: First, indigence in the one asking: If anyone wants. Second, Petition, which is that of sons, as is said Psal. 2.: Ask of me, etc. As asking is of a servant. Hence you have that wisdom is not infused except to sons adopted by grace. Hence Sap. 7. says: God loves no one, except him who dwells with wisdom. Third, the liberality of the giver: Who giveth abundantly to all, whence 3. Reg. cap. 3. it is said to Solomon, who was asking for Wisdom: But even these things, which you did not ask, I have given you, riches and glory. Fourth, the confidence of the one asking: nothing wavering. These things the Holy Doctor says concerning Wisdom. See many Holy Fathers in St. Bonav. lib. 3. Pharetrae, cap. 32.

Quaestio IV: On the illumination that Wisdom brings

On the illumination which Wisdom brings.

Wisdom is as it were the Sun, bringing a day luminous with knowledge, and fervent with affection. Hence Alan of Lille: Wisdom is the Sun, through whom the light of the mind dawns in darkness, the eye of the heart, the fruit of inward love, the delightful paradise of the soul. It converts the earthly to the heavenly, the mortal to the immortal, man to God, with the authority of deifying transformation. This luminous wisdom he desired, who said, Sap. 7.: I invoked, and the Spirit of Wisdom came into me: and I preferred to have her for light: for her light is inextinguishable. And all good things came to me together with her, for she is the Mother of all these good things. See the Holy Doctor in Diaet; tit. 6. cap. 4., saying wondrous things.

Tully first de legibus says: The mother of all good things is Wisdom, than which nothing is more fruitful, nothing more preeminent, for the good of life was given by it. For since it taught all other things, it also taught what is most difficult, that we know ourselves. See St. Bernard sermone 85. in Cant. and serm. 3. de circumcisione, where he shows that from wisdom there arise adornment in the soul, the clarity of conscience, than whose testimony nothing is clearer, since truth shines in the mind, and the mind sees itself in truth. This day, the most serene Sabbath of the mind, he says shines in contemplation, which day indeed, the seventh, namely the seventh gift, has no evening, but here has dawn, and in heaven eternal noon. For the Lord calls it the best part, Luke 10. Hence Anselm lib. de similitudinibus, cap. 131. says: The Gift of Wisdom pertains to the contemplative life, which is the best part, which Mary chose, which shall not be taken from her: But more it shall be perfected in the fatherland. Hence the Gloss there says: The contemplative life here begins, and is perfected in the heavenly fatherland; for love is a fire, which begins to burn, but when it shall see him whom it loves, it shall further glow in love. These things the Holy Doctor, whom see.

Quaestio V: On the spiritual delights of Wisdom

On the spiritual delights of Wisdom.

The Holy Doctor elegantly treats of these from chapter 5, on the Gift of Wisdom, where under the figure of a banquet he expounds the spiritual delights of the Gift of Wisdom.

This banquet is expounded from Canticle 5: Eat, O friends, and drink, and be inebriated, my dearest. Where he shows a threefold banquet prepared by Wisdom. The first is for just friends, that they may eat, chewing by labor, whence it is said: By the labors of your hands, for you shall eat. The second banquet is the sweet drinking of the soul after this life. The third is the inebriation of man after the body has been resumed in the resurrection; and these are called the dearest. See St. Bernard, book On Loving God, where he has: He feeds those laboring in this life, gives drink to those resting after this life, and inebriates those reigning in eternal life, etc.

THE FIRST, therefore, banquet is that of friends, for whom the Holy Spirit prepares the banquet of Wisdom. In this the soul eats the bread of Wisdom, but in the sweat of the face. This food is the very work, to do the will of God; whence Christ said, John 4: My food is to do the will of my Father. Of this St. Gregory, book 1 of the Morals, chapter 16: Wisdom makes a banquet in its day: because it refreshes the mind with the hope and certainty of eternal things. Of this food they partake who by meditation eat the bread that came down from heaven, as is said in John 4. See St. Bonaventure setting forth marvelous things about these.

He proceeds, chapter 6, to set forth the wine of wisdom, of which Proverbs 9: Drink the wine which I have mingled for you. This the worldly lack, John 2: They have no wine, as the Holy Doctor and St. Gaudentius, Bishop of Brescia, excellently expound. Whence the spouse rejoices, Canticle 2: He brought me into the cellar of wine: This is uncreated Wisdom, the eternal Word, containing all the treasures of the wisdom of God hidden away.

This was the generous wine, of which Assuerus was warmed in figure, Esther 15. Of this Canticle 8: I will give you a cup of spiced wine. See the Holy Doctor.

He explains, chapter 7, who are the friends and dearest ones invited to the banquet of Wisdom.

ORIGEN, on that verse of the Canticle I languish with love, distinguishes between simple love, ardor, and languor, saying: Beginners love, the proficient burn, but the perfect languish in love. Therefore, those who love with the greater love are loved by God: I love those who love me. Proverbs 8. The dearest of God are those who take their greatest delight in God, because they love the most. Whence Canticle 7 the Beloved says: How beautiful are you, and how comely, dearest, in delights. Hence the Vercellense: How beautiful are you in affections that burn with fervor and spirit, dearest, on account of your surpassing beauty and ardent love.

FURTHER, St. Dionysius in the letter to Titus, and the Vercellense, on those words of the Canticle 5, Be inebriated, my dearest, expound that inebriation as the abundance of heavenly theorias, that is, the frequency and experiential overflowing of revelations. Such, says Richard, book On Benjamin, chapter 37, was that of Paul, 1 Corinthians 11: Whether in the body, or out of the body, I know not, God knows. To this alludes Psalm 67: There is Benjamin, a stripling, in ecstasy of mind. But he had said before: God will voluntarily separate a rain for his inheritance, and it was weakened, etc. For inebriation effects an alienation of mind, as Richard says, book 4 on contemplation, chapter 16. Whence Psalm 35: They shall be inebriated with the plenty of your house, and you shall make them drink of the torrent of your pleasure.

IF, therefore, we wish to be drenched with this inebriation, let us strive to love the Lord intimately. For thus transformed into God we shall live outside ourselves, as Paul used to say. So great, indeed, is the force of love and of the beautiful, as the Vercellense says in the prologue on the Canticle, that it snatches not only men and Angels outside themselves into God, but even draws God himself outside himself toward creatures. This he learned from St. Dionysius, chapter 4 on the divine names, where he says: One must dare to say what is true, that God himself, by love of what is beautiful and good, goes forth out of the abundance of his amative goodness, as it were outside himself.

HENCE, therefore, the Holy Doctor, chapter 8, ascends to expound the second banquet in glory, where the soul, stripped of the flesh, drinks wine with milk that brings sleep. Canticle 5.

LIKEWISE, chapter 9, he expounds the third banquet of those reigning after the resurrection; of which Luke 22: I dispose to you a kingdom, as my Father has disposed to me, that you may eat and drink at my table, etc. See the Holy Doctor.

Then, chapter 10, he describes the series of those banqueting at that royal feast of wisdom, where he relates wondrous things woven together from the Holy Fathers.

LASTLY, chapter 11, according to the number of the seven gifts, he expounds the beatitude of those banqueting. See him, divinely eloquent.

From what has been said above you can gather in what the gift of Wisdom differs from the other gifts. It differs from the gift of Understanding, because Wisdom is a knowledge of God absolutely; Understanding, however, comparatively, namely in relation to creatures. Second, because by Understanding God is known through illumination from what has been heard in Scripture; but Wisdom is known by experience. Thus through Understanding we know God; through Wisdom we taste his sweetness; whence Wisdom is said to be, as it were, science seasoned with the savor of virtues. And so, just as the gift of Understanding is for speculation, that the intellect may be easily moved toward divine things as they are such in themselves; the gift of Wisdom, however, is practical, rendering the intellect easily movable to perceive divine things as they are good and desirable, and to judge that they are to be adhered to, as St. Bonaventure teaches, book 5 of the Compendium of Theology, chapter 46, St. Thomas, articles 2 and 3, Cajetan there, and question 46, and Valentia, dispute 3, question 20, point 1.

IT DIFFERS also from the gift of science, because this renders the intellect ready to judge what created things are to be adhered to, and in what manner; and it teaches this according to created reasons. The gift of Wisdom, however, shows how one is to adhere to divine things, and according to divine reasons. See St. Bonaventure on the seven gifts, on the Gift of science.

It differs also from the Gift of Counsel; for this teaches what is to be done here and now: Wisdom, however, is universal. See on the Gift of Counsel the Seraphic Doctor..

Quaestio VI: How Folly is opposed to Wisdom

How foolishness is opposed to Wisdom.

FOOLISHNESS is opposed to Wisdom, which is called false Wisdom by St. Gregory, book 13 of the Morals, chapter 14, cited by St. Bonaventure, book 3 of the Pharetra, chapter 32; by Paul it is called: the wisdom of this world, 1 Corinthians 1; and by Gregory, book 31, chapter 20, it is called: Foolishness before God, before whom is the right judgment of things.

THIS, however, consists in a perverse judgment, which postpones divine things to fleeting ones, as St. Augustine says, book 2 on free choice, chapter 16, and On the quantity of the soul, chapter 19, and book 10 on the city of God, chapter 28; and this is called to be wise in a bad sense, and to be foolish, by St. Bernard, the book on the degrees of humility, degree 1; and on the verse: Behold us, etc., he calls it the accursed wisdom, which supplants, and earthly, animal, diabolical, as the Holy Doctor notes, loc. cit. Pharetra, whom see.

IN THE SAME way it is called such by St. James, chapter 3, as the Holy Doctor excellently expounds, on the gift of Wisdom, chapter 1. It is indeed called diabolical, because it deceives so as to destroy. See St. Thomas, question 46, article 2.

JUST as Wisdom gives savor, sweetness, and taste in divine things; so foolishness in fleeting things. Of this, the second book of Wisdom, where those young men cried out: Come, let us enjoy good things, etc. Let us leave everywhere signs of our joy, as the Holy Doctor expounds, sermon 2 within the octave of the Nativity.

From this it is deduced that foolishness is a sin of the same species as that object which is preferred before God. See also St. Thomas, articles 2 and 3.

Quaestio VII: Whether the seventh Beatitude corresponds to the gift of Wisdom

Whether the seventh Beatitude corresponds to the gift of Wisdom.

ST. AUGUSTINE, in the book On the Sermon on the Mount, distributing the gifts among the beatitudes, says: Wisdom befits the peacemakers, in whom there is no rebellious motion, but one obeying reason.

THEREFORE Wisdom corresponds to this seventh beatitude: Blessed are the peacemakers; for they shall be called the children of God: The reason, St. Bonaventure, part 5 of the Breviloquium, chapter 6, is; because Wisdom joins us to the supreme and true good, in which is the end and tranquillity of our whole rational appetite; once this peace is attained, there necessarily follows a superabundant spiritual delight, which is contained in the twelve fruits of the Spirit.

WHY, however, Wisdom is ordered to peace, St. Thomas also explains, question 45, article 6; for peace is the tranquillity of order, as St. Augustine says, book 19 On the city of God; but to order belongs to Wisdom, as Aristotle teaches at the beginning of the Metaphysics, and therefore to be a peacemaker is attributed to Wisdom.

Disputatio XX: On Prudence

Quaestio I: What PRUDENCE is

Quaestio II: Whether PRUDENCE is a virtue

Quaestio III: Which are the offices of PRUDENCE

Quaestio IV: Who are the participants in PRUDENCE

Quaestio V: How Prudence is acquired, and lost

Quaestio VI: On the parts of the Virtue of PRUDENCE

Quaestio VII: How certain rules of prudence, applicable to the Monastic and Political state, are drawn from the Angelic Hierarchy

§ I: On the Prudence that men bound by solemn vows claim for themselves from the first choir of Angels

§ II: On the Governance of the Prelates of the Church, from the Second Hierarchy of the First Choir, likened to the Dominations

§ III: On the Prudence of Judges, compared with the Virtues, from the second order of the second Hierarchy

§ IV: On the governance of Princes, and similar Powers

§ V: On the Prudence of individuals, from the lowest Hierarchy

Quaestio I: Whether there is one PRUDENCE for all the moral virtues

Disputatio XXI: On the Gift of Counsel

Quaestio I: What the gift of COUNSEL is, and what its office is

Quaestio II: How the GIFT OF COUNSEL orders the mind

Quaestio III: Whether the Gift of COUNSEL remains in heaven

Quaestio IV: Whether the fifth Beatitude corresponds to the Gift of Counsel

Disputatio XXII: On the Vices contrary to Prudence

Quaestio I: On PRECIPITATION

Quaestio II: On INCONSIDERATENESS

Quaestio III: On INCONSTANCY

Quaestio IV: On Negligence

Quaestio V: On the prudence of the flesh

Quaestio VI: On ASTUTENESS

Quaestio VII: On CRAFT (dolus)

Quaestio VIII: On FRAUD

Quaestio IX: On solicitude for temporal things

Quaestio X: On solicitude for the Future

Quaestio XI: On the precepts of PRUDENCE

Disputatio XXIII: On Justice

Quaestio I: Whether Ius (right) is the object of JUSTICE

Quaestio II: What JUSTICE is

Quaestio III: Whether JUSTICE is a special virtue

Quaestio IV: In what subject JUSTICE consists

Quaestio V: Whether JUSTICE is the most excellent of the moral Virtues

Quaestio VI: What kind of sin INJUSTICE is, and how it is committed

Quaestio VII: Whether Judgment is an act of JUSTICE

Quaestio VIII: By what means the public Judgment of a Judge is just

Quaestio IX: In what way private judgment about the neighbor is illicit

Quaestio X: Whether Distributive JUSTICE differs in species from Commutative

Disputatio XXIV: On Restitution

Quaestio I: What RESTITUTION is

Quaestio II: Whether RESTITUTION is necessary for salvation

Quaestio III: Who is bound to RESTORE

Dubitatio I: Whether he is a true cause of loss without whom the loss would still have followed

Dubitatio II: On the indirect causes of loss

Dubitatio III: Whether one who has promised three or four times to restore, and has not restored, is to be absolved before restitution

Quaestio IV: To whom RESTITUTION is to be made

Quaestio V: What ought to be restored

Dubitatio I: Whether the goods of fortune are to be restored in the same way

Dubitatio II: In what manner RESTITUTION is to be made for goods of the body

Dubitatio III: Whether, and how, RESTITUTION of Fame, and Honor, is to be made

Dubitatio IV: On the restitution of goods of the soul

Dubitatio V: When a thing acquired by contract is to be restored

Dubitatio VI: When things acquired by donation ought to be restored

Dubitatio VII: When things acquired by prescription are to be restored

Dubitatio VIII: When a thing acquired as wages for the function of an office is to be restored

Dubitatio IX: Whether the wages of harlotry are to be restored

Dubitatio X: When things acquired by fowling, fishing, and hunting are to be restored

Dubitatio XI: When things acquired by the use of common things are to be restored

Dubitatio XII: Whether things acquired in illicit games are to be restored

Dubitatio XIII: Which things are to be restored on account of finding

Dubitatio XIV: On the restitution of goods impeded by violence, fraud, or evil intention

Dubitatio XV: Whether anyone is bound to restore defrauded customs duties

Dubitatio XVI: What form is to be observed in a just tribute

Quaestio VI: How much is to be Restored

Quaestio VII: When restitution is to be made, and the causes excusing from it

Dubitatio I: Whether entrance into Religion excuses from Restitution

Dubitatio II: Whether cession of goods excuses from restitution

Dubitatio III: On the causes excusing from Restitution on the part of the creditor

Dubitatio IV: On the causes excusing from restitution on the part of the debtor

Dubitatio V: On the causes excusing from Restitution on the part of the public authority

Quaestio VIII: Where restitution is to be made

Quaestio IX: How restitution is to be made

Quaestio X: In what order restitution is to be made

Quaestio XI: What Acceptance of Persons is, and what kind of sin

Quaestio XII: Whether, and how, it is a sin of acceptance of persons to choose the unworthy, or less deserving, for benefices

Quaestio XIII: Whether Acceptance of persons has place in the showing of honor, and reverence

Quaestio XIV: Whether acceptance of persons finds a place in the sentences of Judges

Dubitatio I: Whether a JUDGE can, without the note of acceptance of persons, adhere to the Favor of friends, when the law is doubtful among the Doctors

Disputatio XXV: On Homicide

Quaestio I: What Homicide is, and of how many kinds

Quaestio II: On homicide from deliberately, insidiously, and treacherously intending it

Quaestio III: Whether one who commands is to be burdened with the same guilt, and punishment as the one who executes

Quaestio IV: Whether an attempt at homicide, and other crimes, is to be punished with the same penalty as the crime consummated

Quaestio V: What are the punishments of voluntary Homicide

Quaestio VI: Whether it is lawful to kill a man with the moderation of blameless defense, for the defense of himself or his goods

Dubitatio I: Whether it is lawful to kill someone to preserve honor, not by fleeing etc.

Dubitatio II: Whether one who is attacked is bound in some case to kill the aggressor

Dubitatio III: Whether it is lawful, in defense of one's own goods, to kill a thief

Dubitatio IV: Whether, in defense of Chastity, it is lawful to kill the Assailant

Quaestio VII: Whether, and how, MONOMACHIA (dueling) is illicit

Quaestio VIII: Whether it is lawful for a Husband to kill a Wife caught in adultery, and a father his daughter, and a brother his Sister, together with the seducer

Quaestio IX: Whether it is lawful to kill oneself

Dubitatio I: Whether it is lawful to shorten our life by mortifications

Dubitatio II: Whether, to avoid a sin or another evil, it is lawful to kill oneself

Dubitatio III: Whether, for the life of the neighbor, it is lawful to give oneself over to death

Dubitatio IV: When we are bound to die for the salvation of souls

Quaestio X: Whether a pregnant Mother may, to save her own life, procure the abortion of the fetus

Quaestio XI: On accidental Homicide

Quaestio XII: Whether a JUDGE can condemn an innocent man to death who has been proven guilty in the trial

Quaestio XIII: Whether Princes can grant license to kill outlaws

Quaestio XIV: On the Restitution owed on account of homicide, or mutilation

Quaestio XV: Whether the mutilation of a limb is ever lawful

Quaestio XVI: Whether it is lawful to imprison or beat another

Disputatio XXVI: On Theft, and Rapine

Quaestio I: What Dominion is

Quaestio II: Whether it is lawful to have private dominion over things

Quaestio III: What THEFT is

Quaestio IV: What quantity is required for mortal sin in Theft

Dubitatio I: What is the grave quantity of theft for Sons, Wives, and Religious

Quaestio V: Whether Theft is mortal when, from many tiny thefts, there supervenes a particle making the thing grave

Quaestio VI: Whether in extreme, or urgent, necessity it is lawful to take what belongs to another

Quaestio VII: On the Thefts of Religious

Quaestio VIII: Whether men can be reduced to slavery, and sold

Quaestio IX: Whether slaves can wrest themselves from their Masters

Quaestio X: Whether it is lawful, by private authority, to recover what is ours

Quaestio XI: On the punishment of Thieves

Quaestio XII: On the restitution of thefts

Disputatio XXVII: On the JUDGE

Quaestio I: Whether power is necessary in a JUDGE

Quaestio II: Whether a JUDGE ought to follow the truth, and therefore be wise

Quaestio III: Whether the acts of a JUDGE who has not a true but only a putative title are valid, such that not even he sins

Quaestio IV: Whether the POPE can subject himself to someone's judgment

Quaestio V: Whether goodness is necessary in a JUDGE

Quaestio VI: On the external purity of the hands of the Judge

Quaestio VII: Whether excommunicated JUDGES sin in judging, and judge invalidly

Quaestio VIII: On the order to be observed by a JUDGE

Dubitatio I: On the mode of proceeding by Denunciation

Dubitatio II: On the mode of proceeding by Accusation

Dubitatio III: On the mode of proceeding by Inquisition

Disputatio XXVIII: On the Accused

Quaestio I: On the bringing of the Accused to the Tribunal

Quaestio II: Whether the Accused is bound to confess a crime half-proven

Quaestio III: Whether an ACCUSED, infamed for one crime, can be interrogated also about others

Quaestio IV: Whether one convicted of a crime can be interrogated about hidden accomplices, of whom there is no infamy

Quaestio V: Whether an Accused, unjustly denying a true crime for which he was to be condemned to a pecuniary penalty, is bound to pay, and whether he is subject to restitution

Quaestio VI: Whether a Reus, unjustly denying the truth, is bound to retract before the end of the Trial, when he is to be condemned

Quaestio VII: Whether, if the Accused is interrogated again, he can give only a relative answer, saying: as I answered

Quaestio VIII: How the ACCUSED ought to conduct himself in the examination, when pressed by the Judge's iniquitous interrogations

Quaestio IX: Whether it is lawful for the ACCUSED to appeal to another Judge

Quaestio X: Whether, and how, the ACCUSED can defend himself

Quaestio XI: Whether the Accused can flee, and how, and when

Disputatio XXIX: ON WITNESSES

Quaestio I: Whether anyone is sometimes bound to bear witness

Quaestio II: Who can be WITNESSES in a trial

Quaestio III: On the Injustice of false Witnesses

Quaestio IV: What penalties are established for false Witnesses

Disputatio XXX: On the Advocate

Quaestio I: Who can, and ought, to exercise this office

Quaestio II: On the sins of a wicked Advocate

Quaestio III: Whether an ADVOCATE is bound on account of light fault

Quaestio IV: Whether an Advocate, engaged by the year, is worthy of his fee in that year in which he did nothing

Quaestio V: Whether an Advocate is bound to defend a Client gratis in grave necessity

Quaestio VI: Whether an Advocate can receive gifts

Disputatio XXXI: On the Notary and the Tabellion

Quaestio I: On the Justice, or Injustice, of the Notary and the Tabellion

Disputatio XXXII: On Contumely

Quaestio I: What Contumely is, and whence it arises

Quaestio II: How a Christian ought to conduct himself when assailed by contumelies

Disputatio XXXIII: On Detraction

Quaestio I: What Detraction is, and of how many kinds

Quaestio II: Whether detraction is a mortal sin

Quaestio III: Whether it is mortal to reveal a hidden crime to one, or two prudent men, who will keep silent about it

Quaestio IV: Whether material Detraction, which comes from talkativeness, is deadly

Quaestio V: Whether to be silent about a good that has been blackened is mortal

Quaestio VI: On the various cases in which detraction seems to be excused

Quaestio VII: Whether it is ever lawful to defame another with a falsehood, or to open his hidden crime

Quaestio VIII: Whether it is lawful to narrate a crime, notorious in one place, in another, where it is not known

Quaestio IX: Whether it is lawful to open someone's hidden crime to spare him torments

Quaestio X: Whether anyone can defame himself

Disputatio XXXIV: On Whispering, Mockery, and Cursing

Quaestio I: On the malice of Whispering

Quaestio II: On the malice of Mockery

Quaestio III: On Cursings

Tractatus II: E CONTRACTIBUS

Proemium I: Prooemium

Disputatio I: FIRST. On CONTRACTS in general

Quaestio I: What a CONTRACT is, and of how many kinds

Quaestio II: Whether for the validity of a Contract the intention of contracting, and of binding oneself, is required

Quaestio III: How Error, or fraud, vitiates a Contract

Quaestio IV: How fear voids a Contract

Quaestio V: On conditional Contracts

Quaestio VI: On the obligation that results from a valid Contract

Quaestio VII: Which persons can enter into a Contract, and which cannot

Quaestio VIII: Whether, and when, it is lawful to withdraw from a contract, the other party objecting

Disputatio II: On the acquisition of Dominion over Persons, and other things, through the Division of things Acquired

Quaestio I: By what right the first division, and subjection, of things was made

Quaestio II: On the acquisition of DOMINION over Barbarians

Quaestio III: On the acquisition of DOMINION over irrational creatures

Disputatio III: On Promise

Quaestio I: What a PROMISE is, and how it differs from a DONATION

Quaestio II: Whether a simple PROMISE, once accepted, binds in justice

Quaestio III: Whether a merely internal PROMISE, made to a man, binds

Quaestio IV: Whether an external Promise binds before it is accepted

Quaestio V: Whether a PROMISE binds when made for a base cause

Disputatio IV: ON DONATION

Quaestio I: What DONATION is, and of how many kinds

Quaestio II: Who can donate, and what

Quaestio III: On the revocations of donations

Disputatio V: On Buying, and Selling

Quaestio I: What EMPTIO (buying), and VENDITIO (selling), are

Quaestio II: Which persons can buy, and sell

Quaestio III: Which things can be sold

Quaestio IV: Of how many kinds is the price of things

Quaestio V: Whether, for certain causes, it is lawful to reduce below the minimum price, or raise above the maximum

Quaestio VI: Whether on account of ceasing profit, or emerging loss, the price can be raised above the maximum

Quaestio VII: Whether it is lawful to sell more dearly above the top price, awaiting payment, than with money paid down

Quaestio VIII: Whether Stocolia and Barocolia (Italian), Stocch (Spanish, MOHATRA) are lawful

Quaestio IX: To what extent Buying, and Selling, in Monopolies is illicit

Quaestio X: Whether the seller is bound to disclose a grave defect of the thing

Quaestio XI: Whether a thing sold, not yet delivered, perishes to the buyer

Quaestio XII: On the rescission of a sale, and purchase, on account of fraud etc.

Quaestio XIII: Whether a sale with a pact of buying back is lawful

Disputatio VI: On the loan and Usury

Quaestio I: What MUTUUM (loan) and USURY are, and why the latter is a sin

Quaestio II: Whether it is USURY to lend so that, when I have need, you lend back to me, or buy from me at a just price

Quaestio III: Whether it is lawful to lend with the pact that the one who receives the loan confer an office, or ecclesiastical benefice

Quaestio IV: Whether it is USURY to receive, beyond the principal, any other gain whatever besides the money

Quaestio V: Whether, and what, the lender can receive on account of danger, and ceasing profit

Quaestio VI: Whether it is lawful to lend wheat, or something else, with the pact that it be restored in the same measure, even if the price has risen at the time of restitution

Quaestio VII: Whether, and how, gain acquired from Usury is to be restored

Quaestio VIII: Whether it is lawful to seek a loan from a Usurer

Disputatio VII: ON CENSUSES (annuities)

Quaestio I: What a Census is, and of how many kinds

Quaestio II: Whether a Census can lawfully be sold

Quaestio III: From which things a CENSUS can be sold by natural law

Quaestio IV: Until what time a CENSUS can be sold

Quaestio V: What conditions are required for a CENSUS

Disputatio VIII: ON EXCHANGES

Quaestio I: What CAMBIUM (exchange) is, and of how many kinds

Quaestio II: Whether in petty exchange it is lawful to receive something above the value of the coin fixed by law

Quaestio III: Whether in local exchange, or by letters, when the first Campsor receives, so that he may restore elsewhere, he can gain something

Quaestio IV: Whether CAMBIUM is lawful, when for the Campsor a Procurator of the Campsor answers with the moneys of the Campsor himself

Quaestio V: Whether the said Recambia are lawful only on account of ceasing profit, or emerging loss

Quaestio VI: Whether the solutions, and provisions, that Money-changers receive are lawful

Disputatio IX: On the Contract of Partnership

Quaestio I: In what the CONTRACT OF PARTNERSHIP consists, and what is required that it be just

Quaestio II: Whether, and how, other contracts can be united with the Contract of Partnership

Quaestio III: Whether the contract by which, for secure capital, some certain gain is received annually is lawful

Disputatio X: On Emphyteusis, Letting, Hiring, and the Feud

Quaestio I: What EMPHYTEUSIS is

Quaestio II: What Locatio (letting) is

Quaestio III: What a FEUDUM (fief) is, and of how many kinds

Disputatio XI: On Testaments

Quaestio I: What a TESTAMENT is, and of how many kinds

Quaestio II: What solemnity is required for a Testament, closed and open

Quaestio III: Who can, and ought, to make testaments, or be instituted heirs

Quaestio IV: Whether an heir instituted in a testament invalid through defect of solemnity by civil law can pursue the inheritance in the forum of conscience, despoiling the heir succeeding ab intestato

Quaestio V: By what means a Testament is revocable

Quaestio VI: What obligation Heirs instituted by testament undertake

Disputatio XII: On Legacies

Quaestio I: What a Legacy is, and of how many kinds

Quaestio II: Whether legacies ought to be paid to all those for whom they are made, and how

Quaestio III: Which things can be bequeathed

Quaestio IV: What a Pious, or Privileged, Legacy is

Quaestio V: By what means legacies are caducous, such that the Heir is not bound to pay them

Tractatus III: E RELIGIONE

Proemium I: Prooemium

Disputatio I: FIRST. On RELIGION in general

Quaestio I: What the Virtue of RELIGION is

Quaestio II: Whether Religion is a Virtue

Quaestio III: Whether LATRIA, or RELIGION, is a special virtue

Quaestio IV: Whether RELIGION is a Cardinal Virtue

Quaestio V: How widely the acts of Religion extend

Quaestio VI: Whether RELIGION is necessary

Quaestio VII: Whether true RELIGION ought to be one

Disputatio II: ON DEVOTION

Quaestio I: What Devotion is, and of how many kinds

Disputatio III: ON PRAYER

Quaestio I: What Prayer is

Quaestio II: Of how many kinds is PRAYER

Quaestio III: Whether PRAYER is necessary

Quaestio IV: Whether Prayer is not only petitory, but also satisfactory, and meritorious

Quaestio V: What conditions are required for perfect Prayer

Quaestio VI: What is to be sought in Prayer: where the petitions of the Lord's Prayer are expounded

Quaestio VII: Who ought to pray

Quaestio VIII: Who is to be prayed to

Quaestio IX: For whom one ought to pray

Quaestio X: How one ought to pray

Quaestio XI: On that mode of praying, the Canonical Hours

Dubitatio I: Whether Attention is necessary for the Office to be recited by precept

Dubitatio II: Whether one reciting the Office satisfies by reciting another for it

Dubitatio III: Whether to interrupt the parts of the same Hour

Dubitatio IV: Whether one omitting all the hours of one Day commits more sins

Dubitatio V: Whether one reciting the Divine office in Choir with voice very much lowered, so that he is not heard, satisfies

Dubitatio VI: Whether Canons conversing in Choir are capable of distributions

Dubitatio VII: Whether one who recites the office privately ought to hear himself

Dubitatio VIII: Whether one who says the office with a notable cutting off, or truncating, of syllables satisfies

Dubitatio IX: Whether one who says a great part of the office with the mind not intending to satisfy satisfies

Dubitatio X: What is the gravity of the matter in the omission of a Canonical Hour

Disputatio IV: ON ADORATION

Quaestio I: Whether Latria is in the genus of some virtue

Quaestio II: Whether Latria is distinct from Dulia

Quaestio III: On Sacred places, destined for adorations

Disputatio V: ON SACRIFICE

Quaestio I: What a SACRIFICE is

Quaestio II: What is required that a SACRIFICE be right

Quaestio III: Whether Sacrifice is of natural law

Quaestio IV: Whether besides Sacrifice, first-fruits are to be offered

Disputatio VI: On Tithes

Quaestio I: Whether Tithes are to be paid

Quaestio II: From which things tithes are to be paid

Quaestio III: To whom, and by whom tithes are to be paid

Quaestio IV: Where, and when, Tithes are to be paid

Quaestio V: By what authority the payment of tithes is to be exacted

Tractatus IV: E VOTIS

Proemium I: Prooemium

Disputatio I: FIRST. ON THE VOW

Quaestio I: What a VOW is, and what its conditions are

Quaestio II: What deliberation is required for a VOW

Quaestio III: Whether one promising something to God, and knowing the obligation, yet having the intention of not binding himself, is bound by Vow

Quaestio IV: Whether a Votive promise is made to God alone

Quaestio V: How error, or ignorance, concerning a VOW causes involuntariness

Quaestio VI: Whether fear inflicted makes a Vow invalid

Quaestio VII: Whether a necessary thing can be the matter of a Vow

Quaestio VIII: Whether a VOW is only about some good

Quaestio IX: Whether a VOW is only about a better good, or truly also about a lesser good

Quaestio X: Whether a VOW about a thing that can have a good, and an evil, outcome is valid

Quaestio XI: Whether any obligation arises from a VOW, and what it is

Quaestio XII: Whether the immature are bound by Vows

Quaestio XIII: What, and what kind of, is the power of invalidating VOWS

Quaestio XIV: On the power of the Prelates of Religious to invalidate VOWS

Quaestio XV: Whether a husband can invalidate all the Vows of his wife, beyond the Vow of chastity

Quaestio XVI: Whether a husband can invalidate the Vow of Chastity emitted by his wife without license, the marriage standing, and to be fulfilled then

Quaestio XVII: Whether a Husband can invalidate the Vows of his Wife, emitted without his license, to be fulfilled at the time the marriage is dissolved

Quaestio XVIII: Whether a husband can invalidate the Vows of his wife, emitted before marriage

Quaestio XIX: *Whether the Vows of a wife, made without the license of the husband, revive when the marriage is dissolved.*

Quaestio XX: *Whether a husband can invalidate the Vows of his wife emitted by his license: the Vow of Chastity excepted.*

Quaestio XXI: Whether a husband can revoke the Vow of Chastity of his wife, emitted by his license

Quaestio XXII: Whether a Husband can invalidate the Vows of his Wife, emitted under the preceding dominion of a father, or first husband

Quaestio XXIII: Whether a Wife can invalidate certain vows of her husband, and which

Quaestio XXIV: Whether parents, or Tutors, can invalidate all the Vows of their immature Sons

Quaestio XXV: Whether a Father, and Curator, can invalidate the personal Vows of their adolescent sons

Quaestio XXVI: Which real, or mixed, Vows of adolescents can be invalidated by the father

Quaestio XXVII: To whom the faculty of invalidating the Vows of adolescents, and the immature, belongs

Quaestio XXVIII: Which Vows of servants the Lords can invalidate

Quaestio XXIX: Whether in the Church there is power to dispense from Vows

Quaestio XXX: Whether a cause is required for a dispensation, and which

Quaestio XXXI: Whether, and how, the commutation of Vows is to be made

Quaestio XXXII: Whether commutation requires a cause

Question XXXIII

Disputatio II: SECOND. ON THE STATE OF RELIGION, OR ON SOLEMN VOWS

§ I: On the vows of Religious in common

Quaestio I: In what solemn vows differ from simple vows

Quaestio II: Whether solemn VOWS are necessary for the state of a Religious

Quaestio III: Whether, and how, this state is Holy

Quaestio IV: Whether the three vows of Poverty, Chastity, and Obedience are essential to Religion

Quaestio V: Whether the Pontiff can dispense in solemn Vows

Quaestio VI: Who are to be received into Religion

Quaestio VII: On NOVICES

Quaestio VIII: What is required for profession in Religion

Quaestio IX: Whether, and how, Religious are bound to perfection

Quaestio X: Whence the greater perfection of Religion is to be taken

Quaestio XI: On passing to another Religion

Quaestio XII: Whether the three vows of Poverty, Chastity, and Obedience are essential to Religion

Quaestio XIII: Whether the Pontiff can dispense in solemn Vows

Quaestio XIV: Who are to be received into Religion

Quaestio XV: On Novices

Quaestio XVI: What is required for profession in Religion

Quaestio XVII: Whether, and how, Religious are bound to perfection

Quaestio XVIII: Whence the greater perfection of Religion is to be taken

Quaestio XIX: On passing to another Religion

Quaestio XX: On Religious to be expelled

Quaestio XXI: Whether every Religious is bound to all the counsels

Quaestio XXII: Whether Religious ought to teach, preach, etc.

Quaestio XXIII: Whether Religious ought to labor with their hands

Quaestio XXIV: Whether it is lawful for Religious to transact secular business

Disputatio III: On the Vow of OBEDIENCE

Quaestio I: Whether the vow of obedience is chief among the Religious vows

Quaestio II: What obedience is promised in Religion

Quaestio III: Whether Religious are bound to obey Prelates in all things

Quaestio IV: Whether one doubting whether the thing commanded is lawful is bound to obey the Prelate

Quaestio V: Whether all the statutes of Religious Orders bind under sin

Disputatio IV: On the Vow of Poverty

Quaestio I: On the essence of this Vow

Quaestio II: Which Poverty is more excellent

Quaestio III: Whether mendicancy befits Religious Poverty

Quaestio IV: Whether Religious, on account of Poverty, ought to be clothed in mean garments

Quaestio V: Whether austere fare is owed to Religious Poverty

Quaestio VI: How Poverty is violated

Dubitatio I: Whether Prelates can concede to Religious an annual peculium

Dubitatio II: Whether a Religious, having superfluities by license of his superior, is a proprietor

Dubitatio III: Dubitatio III

Dubitatio IV: Whether a Legacy stands for a Religious, as pertaining to him precisely

Quaestio VII: On the penalties, and marks, of a Proprietor

Disputatio V: On the Vow of CHASTITY

Quaestio I: What difference there is between Cloistered, and Clerical, chastity

Quaestio II: From what time the solemn vow of Chastity began to dissolve a subsequent marriage

Quaestio III: Whether one vowing Chastity solemnly dissolves a marriage, whether consummated, or ratified, and by what law, and at what time this began to be done

Quaestio IV: By what law, and at what time, Religious Chastity began to be sealed with cloister

Quaestio V: By what means cloister is violated

Quaestio VI: Whether dispensation can fall upon Religious chastity, and who can dispense in cloister

Disputatio VI: On the Oath

Quaestio I: What an OATH is, and of how many kinds

Quaestio II: Whether it is lawful to swear by GOD

Quaestio III: Whether it is lawful to swear by creatures

Quaestio IV: What is required for an Oath

Quaestio V: Whether, and how, it is a Sin to swear without Truth

Quaestio VI: Whether, and what sin, is an OATH made without justice

Quaestio VII: Whether, and what sin, is an OATH lacking judgment

Quaestio VIII: Whether, and how, a custom of swearing is evil

Quaestio IX: When precisely one swearing incautiously from custom sins mortally

Quaestio X: What sin it is to swear dolosely

Quaestio XI: Whether it is lawful to require an Oath from a perjurer

Quaestio XII: Whether, and when, it is lawful to require an Oath from an Idolater

Quaestio XIII: On the obligation of a promissory Oath in itself

Quaestio XIV: Whether dolous Oaths bind

Quaestio XV: Whether an Oath extorted by injury, as of paying usuries, binds

Quaestio XVI: Whether an Oath extorted by fear binds

Quaestio XVII: Whether someone's Oath, by fraud, or error, or ignorance, is void

Quaestio XVIII: Whether an incautious promissory Oath binds

Quaestio XIX: Whether an Oath confirms contracts that could otherwise be voided

Quaestio XX: On the means of removing the obligation of an Oath

Quaestio XXI: On the Penalties imposed upon Perjuries

Disputatio VII: On Adjuration

Quaestio I: What ADJURATION is, and by what means it is made

Quaestio II: Whom it is lawful to adjure

Disputatio VIII: On Divine Praises

Quaestio I: NICA. On the Nature, and quality, of Divine praises

Disputatio IX: On the Observance of Feast Days

Quaestio I: On the origin of FEAST days

Quaestio II: Whose it is to institute FEASTS to be observed under mortal sin

Quaestio III: Whether mortal sins on a Feast are forbidden by this precept

Quaestio IV: Whether licit liberal work becomes servile because it is done for gain

Quaestio V: Which are servile works, forbidden on the Feast day

Dubitatio I: Which works are forbidden by Canon law on a feast

Quaestio VI: That a time of servile labor induces a grave transgression of the FEAST

Quaestio VII: On the causes excusing from violation of the Feast

Quaestio VIII: Whether, having merely heard a SACRED (sermon), it is forbidden to idle the whole Feast day

Disputatio X: On Superstition

Quaestio I: SUPERSTITION, what it is, and of how many kinds

Quaestio II: On Divination by the Stars

Quaestio III: On Divination by the Elements, and other mixed things

Quaestio IV: On Divination from Dreams

Quaestio V: On Sortileges

Quaestio VI: On superstitious observances for works

Quaestio VII: On the malefices of Witches

Quaestio VIII: Whether it is lawful to consult Witches, that at least the malefices be removed

Quaestio IX: On the penalties of Witches, etc.

Disputatio XI: ON THE TEMPTATION OF GOD

Quaestio I: What TEMPTATION is, and of how many kinds

Disputatio XII: ON SACRILEGE

Quaestio I: What Sacrilege is, and of how many kinds

Disputatio XIII: ON SIMONY

Quaestio I: What SIMONY is, and of how many kinds

Quaestio II: How Simony is recognized on the part of the object

Quaestio III: In what way Simony is committed on the part of the act of exchange itself

Quaestio IV: On the Penalties of Simoniacs

Disputatio XIV: ON THE OTHER VIRTUES ANNEXED TO JUSTICE

§ I: ON PIETY

Quaestio I: What PIETY is, and what kind of Virtue

Quaestio II: What reverence is to be shown to Parents

Quaestio III: What obedience is to be shown to Parents by Sons

Quaestio IV: How, and when, Sons are bound to relieve Parents

Quaestio V: On the obligation of Parents toward Sons

Quaestio VI: In which cases Parents can disinherit Sons

Quaestio VII: Whether Sons can ever refuse aliment to Parents, and disinherit them

Quaestio VIII: To what a Woman is bound, who has a Son from adultery, or has substituted one

Quaestio IX: On the mutual obligation of Servants, and Masters

Quaestio X: On the obligation of Brothers toward Brothers, and Sisters, and conversely

§ II: On Observance, Reverence, and Dulia

Quaestio I: On Observance, and Reverence

Quaestio II: On Dulia

§ III: ON OBEDIENCE, and DISOBEDIENCE

Quaestio I: On Observance, and Reverence

Quaestio II: On DISOBEDIENCE

§ IV: ON GRATITUDE, and VINDICATION, and the Vices opposed to them

Quaestio I: On GRATITUDE

Quaestio II: On INGRATITUDE

Quaestio III: On Vindication

§ V: On Truth, Friendship, Liberality, Epikeia, and the vices opposed to them: On the gift of Piety, and the Precepts of the Decalogue pertaining to Justice

Quaestio I: On TRUTH

Quaestio II: On the LIE

Dubitatio I: What a Lie is

Dubitatio II: Of how many kinds is a Lie

Dubitatio III: Whether every lie is intrinsically a sin

Dubitatio IV: Whether a Lie is mortal of its genus

Dubitatio V: Whether every Lie is mortal for perfect men

Dubitatio VI: Whether among the degrees of Lie there is a most grave, and a most light

Dubitatio VII: On the others that are reduced to Lying

Quaestio III: On Friendship

Quaestio IV: On Liberality

Dubitatio I: On Avarice

Dubitatio II: On PRODIGALITY

Quaestio V: On EPIKEIA

Quaestio VI: On the GIFT OF PIETY

Tractatus V: E VIRTUTE FORTITUDINIS

Proemium I: Prooemium

Disputatio I: FIRST. ON FORTITUDE

Quaestio I: Whether FORTITUDE is a Virtue, and which

Quaestio II: On the GIFT OF FORTITUDE

Quaestio III: On Martyrdom

Dubitatio I: Whether MARTYRDOM confers first grace

Dubitatio II: Whether the Baptism of infants can be supplied by martyrdom

Quaestio IV: On the precepts of Fortitude

Quaestio V: On the Vices opposed to Fortitude

Disputatio II: On the Virtues joined to Fortitude

Quaestio I: On Magnanimity

Quaestio II: On the Vices opposed to MAGNANIMITY

Quaestio III: On MAGNIFICENCE

Quaestio IV: On the Vices opposed to MAGNIFICENCE

Quaestio V: On PATIENCE

Quaestio VI: On the Vices opposed to PATIENCE

Quaestio VII: On PERSEVERANCE

Quaestio VIII: On the Vices opposed to PERSEVERANCE

Tractatus VI: E TEMPERANTIA

Proemium I: Prooemium

Disputatio I: FIRST. ON THE VIRTUE OF TEMPERANCE

Quaestio I: Which Virtue Temperance is, and of what kind

Quaestio II: Which Vices are contrary to TEMPERANCE

Quaestio III: On the parts of TEMPERANCE

Quaestio IV: On Shamefastness

Quaestio V: On Honesty

Quaestio VI: On Abstinence

Dubitatio I: What FASTING is, and of how many kinds

Dubitatio II: In what way natural Fasting is broken

Dubitatio III: Whether Fasting of itself is a good work, and a precept

Dubitatio IV: From what one must abstain in the Ecclesiastical Fast

Dubitatio V: On the evening collation

Dubitatio VI: On the hour of refreshment on the Fast day

Dubitatio VII: Who are bound to fast

Quaestio VII: On SOBRIETY

Quaestio VIII: On CHASTITY

Quaestio IX: On Virginity

Dubitatio I: Whether Virginity is a Virtue

Dubitatio II: Whether Virginity excels conjugal Continence

Dubitatio III: Whether the reward of Virginity is the Aureole

Quaestio X: On CONTINENCE

Dubitatio I: On MILDNESS

Quaestio XI: On CLEMENCY

Quaestio XII: On MODESTY

Quaestio XIII: On HUMILITY

Disputatio II: On the Vices opposed to the Virtue of TEMPERANCE

Quaestio I: On GLUTTONY

Quaestio II: On Drunkenness

Quaestio III: On LUST

Dubitatio I: What LUST is, and of how many kinds

Dubitatio II: Whether in the genus of Lust there is parvity of matter

Dubitatio III: On FORNICATION

Dubitatio IV: On STUPRATION

Dubitatio V: On INCEST

Dubitatio VI: On ADULTERY

Dubitatio VII: On SACRILEGE

Dubitatio VIII: On sins against nature

Dubitatio IX: On the lust of spouses

Dubitatio X: On ABDUCTION

Quaestio IV: On INCONTINENCE

Quaestio V: On ANGER

Quaestio VI: On CRUELTY

Question VII

Dubitatio I: On the adornment of Women

Dubitatio II: On Immodesty in words, gestures, jokes, and games

Quaestio VIII: On P R I D E

Quaestio IX: LAST. On the other Vices opposed to the potential parts of Temperance

Tractatus VII: E VARIIS HOMINUM STATIBUS, ET OFFICIIS

Proemium I: Prooemium

Disputatio I: FIRST. ON STATES, AND PERFECTION IN GENERAL

Quaestio I: What a STATE is, and of how many kinds

Quaestio II: On the state of perfection

Dubitatio I: In what the Perfection of man consists

Dubitatio II: What Perfection can be had in this life

Dubitatio III: Who are in the state of Perfection

Quaestio III: Whether some who are not in the state of perfection perform, by reason of their office, works more perfect than some who are in the state of Perfection

Disputatio II: On the State of the Bishop

Quaestio I: Whether a BISHOP is in the state of perfection

Quaestio II: Of what kind he must be who is assumed to the Episcopate

Quaestio III: Whether it is lawful to seek, or refuse, an Episcopate

Quaestio IV: Whether Residence is necessary for Bishops, and by what law

Quaestio V: Whether the Church, and Bishops, have dominion over certain temporal things

Quaestio VI: Whether Bishops, and other Ecclesiastics, have dominion over revenues that are superfluous to their state

Quaestio VII: Whether those Bishops who were formerly Religious are bound to Regular observance

Disputatio III: On the State of Regular Prelacy

Quaestio I: Whether the state of Regular Prelacy in a Religion is necessary

Quaestio II: How the Prelate of a Religion is to be chosen

Quaestio III: How many Prelates there are in one religion, and what order among them

Quaestio IV: Whether it befits a Regular Prelate to remain long in the same office

Quaestio V: Whether a religious Prelate has the power of coercing subjects with penalties, both spiritual and corporal

Quaestio VI: What solemnities a Regular Prelate, acting in judgment, is bound to observe

Quaestio VII: Whether appeal can be made from a Prelate, or Regular Judge

Quaestio VIII: Who is the Judge from Whom, and to Whom appeal is made

Quaestio IX: Whether a Regular Prelate can dispense with his subject, Who, and in what

Quaestio X: What power a Regular Prelate has to absolve, both from sins, and from penalties

Quaestio XI: Whether a Regular Prelate has the Power of administering temporal things, and what

Quaestio XII: Whether, and What, Regular Prelates can do concerning conferring Orders, and blessing things, or places

Disputatio IV: LAST. On the State of the Active, and Contemplative life

Quaestio I: Whether the Division of life into Active, and Contemplative is sufficient

Quaestio II: Which state is more excellent than the other: the state of the Active life, or conversely, the Contemplative

Quaestio III: Whether there is a Mixed Life resulting from the Active, and Contemplative, and which of these is more excellent

Quaestio IV: What are the chief exercises of the Active life

Quaestio V: On the chief Act of the Contemplative life, and how this act differs from Cogitation, Meditation, Speculation, and Intuitive vision

Quaestio VI: Whether Contemplation has certain degrees of its perfection, how many, and which

↑ Top of work