Palladium theologicum, Tomus quintus: De virtutibus
Gaudenzio da Brescia (1612–1672)
Reuerendi patris Gaudentij Bontempi, ... Palladium theologicum, seu Tota theologia scholastica in septem tomos distributa. Ad intimam mentem d. Bonauenturae seraphici doctoris ... Tomus quintus, De virtutibus
First published 1676
Bontempi's Palladium theologicum (Lyon 1676) is a complete scholastic theology composed ad mentem D. Bonaventurae, arranged in seven tractatus on the order of the Secunda secundae. This fifth volume, De virtutibus, treats the theological virtues (faith, hope, charity, with their gifts, beatitudes and fruits), the cardinal virtues and their opposite vices, and the states and offices of men (religious and prelates, bishops, princes), including the extensive disputations on contracts, religion, vows, fortitude, temperance and the judicial process. It is a significant example of the Bonaventurian scholastic school and a counterpart to the Thomist manuals of the period.
Tractatus I: PRIMUS DE VIRTUTIBUS THEOLOGICIS
Proemium I: Prooemium
Disputatio I: ON FAITH
Quaestio I: What FAITH signifies, and what it is
Quaestio II: What the object of FAITH is
Quaestio III: Whether the object of FAITH is something complex
Quaestio IV: Whether the object of FAITH can be false
Quaestio V: Whether the object of FAITH can be evident scientifically
Quaestio VI: Whether FAITH is concerned with those things which are seen by vision on the way
Quaestio VII: Whether the articles of FAITH are evidently credible
Quaestio VIII: Whether the things to be believed are rightly arranged according to the articles
Quaestio IX: Whether the articles of FAITH have grown over the course of time
Quaestio X: Whether FAITH has grown as regards light
Quaestio XI: Whether Faith has grown in certitude
Quaestio XII: Whether the articles of Faith are to be expounded by some authority which is an infallible teacher, and what it is
Quaestio XIII: What are the marks of the true Church, in which the authority of expounding FAITH resides
Quaestio XIV: What must be believed by the necessity of means
Quaestio XV: What things are to be believed by the necessity of precept
Quaestio XVI: Whether we are bound to confess FAITH, and when
Quaestio XVII: Whether it is lawful to dispute about FAITH, and when
Quaestio XVIII: Whether Faith resides in the Intellect
Quaestio XIX: Whether Faith is perfected by Charity, as by its form
Quaestio XX: Whether it is certain that FAITH remains without CHARITY
Quaestio XXI: Whether, and how, FAITH is a VIRTUE
Quaestio XXII: Whether FAITH is ONE VIRTUE
Quaestio XXIII: Whether FAITH is the first of the Virtues
Quaestio XXIV: Whether FAITH is more certain than any science, or than any intellectual habit
Quaestio XXV: Whether one can know with certainty that he has FAITH
Quaestio XXVI: In whom FAITH is found
Quaestio XXVII: Whether FAITH is a substantial Gift of GOD
Quaestio XXVIII: Whether the difference between FAITH and other acts, natural as opposed to supernatural moral acts, always arises from the object
Quaestio XXIX: On the effects of FAITH
Quaestio XXX: On the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING
Dubitatio I: Whether UNDERSTANDING is a gift of the Holy Ghost
Dubitatio II: Whether the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING can coexist with FAITH
Dubitatio III: Whether the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING consists in the contemplation of the Creator and of Creation
Dubitatio IV: Whether the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING is found in all who have grace, and whether in these alone
Dubitatio V: What is the necessity and utility of the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING
Dubitatio VI: Whether* **the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING** *corresponds to the sixth beatitude, namely, Blessed are the clean of heart, etc.
Dubitatio VII: Whether* **to the GIFT OF UNDERSTANDING** *there corresponds, among the fruits of the Holy Ghost, Faith
Quaestio XXXI: On the Gift of Knowledge
Dubitatio I: Whether* **KNOWLEDGE** *is a gift of the Holy Ghost
Dubitatio II: Whether knowledge is concerned with Divine things
Dubitatio III: Whether the gift of knowledge is speculative
Dubitatio IV: Whether the third Beatitude corresponds to the Gift of Knowledge: Blessed are they that mourn, etc.
Disputatio II: On Unbelief
Quaestio I: What UNBELIEF is, and what kind of sin it is
Quaestio II: Whether all the works of unbelievers are sins
Quaestio III: Whether unbelievers can be compelled to hear FAITH
Quaestio IV: Whether unbelievers can be compelled to embrace our FAITH, when it has been sufficiently set forth
Quaestio V: Whether unbaptized unbelievers can be compelled to abandon errors or rites contrary to natural reason
Quaestio VI: Whether the rites of unbelievers are to be permitted
Quaestio VII: Whether it is lawful to make agreements with unbelievers about the toleration of their rites
Quaestio VIII: Whether unbaptized unbelievers can retain power over the Faithful, and whether they can be deprived of it
Disputatio III: On Heresy
Quaestio I: What HERESY is
Quaestio II: Whether one who doubts about the articles of FAITH is a heretic
Quaestio III: Whether one who gives merely opinionative assent to an article of FAITH is a heretic
Quaestio IV: Whether, and what, Ignorance excuses from Heresy
Quaestio V: What pertinacity is required for HERESY
Quaestio VI: Whether, for one to be deemed a Heretic, it is necessary that he have been baptized and a believer
Quaestio VII: Whether the Church can compel heretics to receive the Catholic FAITH
Quaestio VIII: On the other means the Church uses against heretics, by forbidding their Books
Quaestio IX: Whether we are bound to avoid the conversation of heretics
Quaestio X: What excommunication is inflicted upon heretics
Quaestio XI: On the other spiritual punishments of heretics
Quaestio XII: On the temporal punishments of Heretics
Disputatio IV: On Hope
Quaestio I: What HOPE is
Quaestio II: What the material object of HOPE is
Question III
Quaestio IV: Whether a certain object is set forth for HOPE, and is hoped for
Quaestio V: Whether Hope is a Virtue
Quaestio VI: Whether HOPE is a Theological Virtue
Quaestio VII: Whether HOPE is at times formless
Quaestio VIII: Whether HOPE arises from merits
Quaestio IX: Whether Hope precedes Charity
Quaestio X: What the proximate subject of HOPE is
Quaestio XI: Whether HOPE remains in the Blessed
Quaestio XII: Whether there is a precept of hoping in GOD
Dubitatio I: UNICA. Would this precept bind one to whom certain damnation had been revealed
Disputatio V: On the Gift of Fear
Quaestio I: Whether FEAR is a Habit distinct from HOPE
Quaestio II: What the object of FEAR is
Quaestio III: Whether worldly Fear is always evil
Quaestio IV: Whether servile Fear is honorable, and a Gift of God
Quaestio V: Whether servile Fear is cast out when grace comes
Quaestio VI: Whether Initial and Filial Fear differ specifically
Quaestio VII: Whether, as Charity grows, Fear diminishes
Quaestio VIII: Whether gratuitous Fear remains in the fatherland
Quaestio IX: Whether Poverty of Spirit corresponds to the GIFT OF FEAR
Quaestio X: On the Effects, and the precept, of the FEAR OF GOD
Disputatio VI: On Despair
Quaestio I: UNICA. Of what power DESPAIR is an act, and what sin it is
Disputatio VII: On Presumption
Quaestio I: What PRESUMPTION is, and what kind of sin
Disputatio VIII: On Charity
Quaestio I: What CHARITY is
Quaestio II: What the object of Charity is
Quaestio III: Whether Charity is properly the friendship of God
Quaestio IV: Whether Charity is a created Habit
Quaestio V: Whether Charity is one special Virtue
Quaestio VI: Whether Charity is of a most special species
Quaestio VII: Whether Charity is the most excellent of the virtues
Quaestio VIII: Whether Charity is the Form of the Virtues
Quaestio IX: Whether besides infused Charity there is another charity, acquired by our own acts
Quaestio X: Whether Charity can be formless
Quaestio XI: Whether CHARITY increases, and how
Quaestio XII: Whether, and how, CHARITY in this life is perfect
Quaestio XIII: Whether Charity can be lost, and how
Quaestio XIV: What is the proximate subject of Charity
Quaestio XV: Whether God alone is to be loved out of Charity, or the neighbor also
Quaestio XVI: Whether Charity is to be loved out of Charity
Quaestio XVII: Whether all gratuitous gifts are to be loved out of CHARITY
Quaestio XVIII: Whether irrational creatures are to be loved out of CHARITY
Quaestio XIX: Whether a man ought to love himself out of CHARITY
Quaestio XX: Whether a man ought to love his own body out of Charity
Quaestio XXI: Whether sinners are to be loved out of Charity
Quaestio XXII: Whether it is necessary to love enemies out of CHARITY
Quaestio XXIII: Whether we are bound to show the effects of CHARITY toward enemies, and which
Quaestio XXIV: Whether Angels are to be loved out of CHARITY
Quaestio XXV: Whether Demons, and the Damned, are to be loved out of CHARITY
Quaestio XXVI: Whether it is fitting that four things to be loved out of CHARITY are enumerated
Quaestio XXVII: Whether God, and the neighbor, are loved with the same habit of CHARITY
Quaestio XXVIII: Whether there is order in CHARITY
Quaestio XXIX: Whether GOD is to be loved more than the neighbor
Quaestio XXX: Whether a man ought out of CHARITY to love God more than himself
Quaestio XXXI: Whether Nature inclines more to loving GOD than to loving ourselves
Quaestio XXXII: Whether a man ought to love himself more than his neighbor
Quaestio XXXIII: Whether the eternal salvation of the neighbor is to be loved more than our own life
Quaestio XXXIV: Whether one neighbor is to be loved more than another
Quaestio XXXV: Whether a Son is to be loved more than a Father
Quaestio XXXVI: Whether a man ought out of CHARITY to love his Mother more than his Father
Quaestio XXXVII: Whether a man ought to love his spouse more than his parents, and Children
Quaestio XXXVIII: Whether the order of CHARITY is considered in the affection, and in the effect
Quaestio XXXIX: Whether the order of CHARITY remains in heaven
Quaestio XL: Whether it is more proper to Charity to love than to be loved
Quaestio XLI: Whether Love is the same as Benevolence
Quaestio XLII: Whether, and whether he can, GOD must be loved in the way with the whole heart, the whole soul, the whole mind, and all one's strength
Quaestio XLIII: Whether some measure is to be kept in Divine love
Quaestio XLIV: Whether Charity ought to be enlarged in heaven
Quaestio XLV: Whether it is more meritorious to love an enemy than a friend
Quaestio XLVI: Whether a man, constituted in however small CHARITY, is bound to undergo death for CHRIST
Quaestio XLVII: Whether those having perfect CHARITY are bound to fulfill the things that are of perfection
Quaestio XLVIII: How, and when, the precept of the love of GOD binds
Quaestio XLIX: Whether a man is bound at the first instant of the use of reason to be converted to GOD
Quaestio L: How, and when, the precept of the love of the neighbor binds
Disputatio IX: On the internal effects of Charity, JOY, PEACE, and MERCY
§ I: On Joy
Quaestio I: Whether JOY is an Effect of Charity, and of what kind
Quaestio II: Whether JOY is a virtue
§ II: On Peace
Quaestio I: UNICA. What PEACE is
§ III: On Mercy
Quaestio I: What MERCY is
Quaestio II: Which, and what kind of Virtue, MERCY is
Disputatio X: On the external effects of Charity
§ I: De Beneficentia
Quaestio I: UNICA. What BENEFICENCE is
§ II: On Almsgiving
Quaestio I: Whether to give ALMS is an act of Charity
Quaestio II: Whether the kinds of ALMS are fittingly distinguished
Quaestio III: Whether ALMS is a matter of precept
Quaestio IV: Whether it is a precept, in common necessities, to give superfluities to the poor
Quaestio V: Whether anyone is bound at some time to give alms from things necessary to his state, apart from the extreme necessity of the neighbor
Quaestio VI: Whether alms is owed out of justice to one in extreme need
Quaestio VII: Whether Alms ought to be given from justly possessed goods
§ III: On Fraternal Correction
Quaestio I: Whether FRATERNAL CORRECTION is a matter of precept
Quaestio II: Whether the order of fraternal correction, even in Religious Orders, is a matter of precept, so that the correction first be made in secret
Disputatio XI: On Hatred
Quaestio I: What the object of HATRED is, and what it is
Quaestio II: What, and what kind of sin, hatred is
Disputatio XII: On Sloth
Quaestio I: What ACEDIA is, and what its object is
ACEDIA is a Greek word, ἀκηδία, which signifies carelessness, or negligence. Then also a certain sadness that aggravates and oppresses the soul, so that it brings forth that carelessness. Now that sadness can be either of sense, or of the will. Here it is taken for the sadness of the will, bringing forth carelessness in the good work.
Now this can be described, from D. Thom. art. 1. and D. Bonavent. p. 1. Centil. sect. 21. and in Diaeta, tit. 2. cap. 7. and in the Declaratione terminorum Theologiae, where Latius also describes its daughters in the speculo animae, cap. 3.: Acedia is the sadness of the will concerning a good, in some measure divine and ours, esteemed as an evil of one's own, on account of the difficulty joined to obtaining it, bringing forth in consequence carelessness and torpor in salutary works.
From these you have, first, that Acedia is a sin, since it is sadness about good. Hence you will find this tepidity rebuked in Scripture, Proverb 8. How long, sluggard, wilt thou sleep? Then: The sluggard wills, and wills not. Ecclesiast. 6. Subject thy shoulder, and bear it, that is, spiritual discipline, and be not grieved with its bands. Matth. 3. Every tree that doth not bring forth good fruit shall be cut down, etc. Therefore at Matth. 25. and Lucae 19. the servant is gravely punished, because he hid the talent dug in the earth, as the S. Doct. shows in the speculo animae, cap. 3., where he also observes that that lukewarm one is to be vomited forth, Apoc. 3.; and on 8. Lucae, him who puts the lamp under a bushel. See many Fathers in D. Bonavent. lib. 2. Pharetrae, cap. 10.
You HAVE secondly, that this sin is opposed to the virtue of Charity: for it is contrary to its joy, as S. Bonav. teaches, p. 1 Centiloq. loc. cit.
You HAVE thirdly, that it is mortal of its genus, if it be about a good divinely commanded, etc., as D. Thom. notes, art. 3. ad secundum. And D. Bonav. in the Speculo animae, cap. 3. and lib. 3. Compendy Theol. cap. 25. But if it be about a good not commanded, it is venial.
You HAVE fourthly, that this is a capital vice; for, as the Philosopher says, 8. Eth. cap. 6.: No one can long remain in sadness without delight: So much so that those who are vexed with sadness do something else, that they may seek pleasure. Thus it is named by D. Gregory, 21. Moral. cap. 17. in D. Bonav. in the speculo animae, cap. 3.
The REMEDY of acedia Cassianus assigns, lib. 10. de Institut. Coenobiorum, cap. ultimo. And Climacus grad. 21. in D. Bonav. de pugna spirituali, cap. 7. Bernardus serm. 3. de Ascensione: resist gravely, and undertake and pursue the work strenuously. D. Bonav. loc. cit. Diaetae assigns a variety of occupations, never idling, but working variously, now praying, now reading, now singing. See D. Bonav. de pugna spirituali, loco citato.
From these you will understand many definitions of acedia, related by D. Bonav. p. 1. Centil. sect. 1. The first from D. August.: Acedia is weariness of the internal good. The second from Richard: It is tepor of the soul, neglecting to begin the good. The third from Damascene, lib. 1. de fide, cap. 14.: It is an aggravating sadness. The fourth from many Masters: Acedia is diffidence about one's own powers and the help of God for fulfilling arduous things, or commandments.
From these S. Bonaventure elicits that Acedia is essentially indeed opposed to the joy of charity; but not insofar as diffidence is opposed to Hope, inasmuch as it is weariness of the internal good, from which pusillanimity is generated: It is opposed to Fortitude: Inasmuch as it esteems all things difficult, even the easier; It is opposed to Charity, which makes all things easy.
Now, since Acedia is a capital vice, it has many sons and daughters. The first is malice, which is the will, impatient of burden, scheming evil against him whom it esteems to be inflicting that burden on it. The second is rancor, which is the will, embittered by the impotence of repelling the burden, manifesting by an external sign the bitterness shut up within. The third is pusillanimity, which is the will immoderately fearing the burden in undertaking things to be done, or immoderately diffiding in its own powers. The fourth is despair, which is the will, oppressed by burden, diffiding in the help for acting, or in the divine remuneration on account of the sustaining of the burden, which is diffiding in the fulfilling of the commandments. The fifth is Torpor, which is the will succumbing to the burden, tepid or sluggish toward the completion of things undertaken: The sixth is the wandering of the mind about illicit things, which is the will, destitute of internal joy, seeking rest or consolation in illicit exterior things.
ACCORDING to Isidorus, lib. in Deuter. cap. 16., some are daughters of sadness; others of acedia; for he himself calls sadness the will, inasmuch as it turns itself away from a grave duty.
But he calls acedia the will, inasmuch as it converts itself to undue rest. He says first: From sadness go out rancor, pusillanimity, bitterness, despair; From acedia arise otiosity, somnolency, importunity, disquietude of mind, instability of body, curiosity. S. Bonav. has all these loc. cit. p. 1. Centiloquii.
In the Diaeta tit. primo, cap. 7. he names fifteen daughters of acedia, and they are: Tepiditas, mollicies, somnolentia, otiositas, dilatio, tarditas, negligentia, imperfectio, remissio, dissolutio, ignavia, indolentia, tristitia, taedium vitae, desperatio. He says these vices were expressed by the fifteen cubits by which the water ascended above the mountains in the deluge, Genes. 7.; thus they submerge and suffocate the acedious within these vices.
¶ There the S. Doctor has most illustrious things against Acedia for sermons, which it would be too prolix to transcribe here.
He heaps up very many Scriptures for it in the Bibliis pauperum, cap. 117.
But the S. Doctor teaches in the confessional, cap. 2. particula 5., how the penitent is to be interrogated about Acedia: Whether through weariness he omitted that good, even though commanded: Whether in doing evil he began to take joy: Whether he deterred others from the good by mocking, etc. See the S. Doctor himself, discussing all the daughters of Acedia, distinguished by thoughts, words, and deeds.